Florida primary found non-compliant
The DNC has taken a swipe at the nation's fourth biggest state, and the one that determined the 2000 election.
Under a vote taken moments ago by a powerful committee of the Democratic National Committee, if things don’t change, Florida’s primary on Jan. 29 will be a beauty context – the delegates won’t count toward the party’s presidential nomination.
Florida officials complained they were being "disenfranchised," but the DNC strongly pushes back against that contention, since it has rules that Florida decided not to follow.
This is the party’s way of trying to stop the crazy domino effect of states moving their nominating contests earlier and earlier, which causes OTHER states to go earlier and earlier.
The DNC’s Rules and Bylaws Committee voted nearly unanimously that Florida’s plan is non-compliant with party rules, and gave the state 30 days to fix it. Otherwise, the state will lose 100 percent of its delegates. “The ayes clearly have it,” RBC co-chair James Roosevelt Jr. said, when only one clear voice on the 30-member committee said “no.”
As the meeting broke up and all the cameras and reporters (and there are a bunch of both) lunged for the Florida folks, I walked up to the dais and asked Mr. Roosevelt and his co-chair, Alexis M. Herman, the practical consequences for Florida if the sanctions remain in place.
Roosevelt:
“The event on Jan. 29 would be purely a beauty contest -- equivalent, as somebody said, to the Iowa straw poll.” Herman: “But voters WOULD get to register their preference. I think that’s important to point out.”
Roosevelt: “There would be a state-run poll or beauty contest, as has happened before. But there would NOT be a selection of delegates for the national convention in that process.”
What will happen at the national convention? Will Florida have a section with a "Sunshine State" sign and the funny hats?
Herman: “This would then come under the purview of the credentials committee of the convention. And the convention credentials committee would then have to make a determination as to how they would interpret whatever activities would have occurred in Florida – be it the 29th process, or any subsequent activities, if it were not party approved.”
What are the consequences for the campaigns--Clinton, Obama and the others? Would there be penalties for campaigning in Florida?
Roosevelt:
“This resolution that was voted here, because it takes away 100 percent of the delegates if the rules are violated, means that there are no particular sanctions on the campaigns if they were to campaign in Florida.” Herman: “Because there’s no apportionment of delegates in that process.”
Roosevelt: “If we were only taking away 50 percent, those campaigns that participated would be penalized.”
Do you think the candidates will campaign in Florida?
Roosevelt: “My impression is that, just as a political judgment, some intend to and some don’t.”
I’m typing this in the lounge of the Capital Hilton, which is closed but people are using the comfy chairs anyway. There’s a big Scottish Rite event here – a two day joint session of several of the group’s “Supreme Councils.” Everyone has their bureaucracies.
I’ll pop up some quotes from the lively debate.
The Politico's Roger Simon will have the full skinny in a bit.
By Mike Allen 01:09 PM
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0807/Florida_primary_found_noncompliant.html