Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The stand-off between the DNC and Florida will come down to one thing.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cobalt1999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 07:48 AM
Original message
The stand-off between the DNC and Florida will come down to one thing.
Edited on Sun Aug-26-07 07:49 AM by cobalt1999
Does the DNC committee punishments violate the federal Voting Rights Act by ignoring a states votes?

If so, Florida has the ace in the hole and can threaten to take it to court, then the DNC will have to accept the delegates.

If not and it's legal to ignore the Florida voters, then the Florida democrats will have to do some caucus solution (which isn't practical in this state) or not be counted.

I don't know the answer either. Maybe some of you legal experts know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. Does That Matter For Primaries?
I thought that political parties could pick their candidate any way they want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cobalt1999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I don't know.
Florida democratic senator Nelson has threatened to take the DNC to court over this, so there may be some grounds for doing so. Even if the Voting Rights Act doesn't apply, there are numerous other federal laws protecting voting rights.

I am curious if the DNC punishment is even legal. If not, game over. If so, then we've got an ugly situation brewing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. Instead of all this in-fighting
and moving up and moving up of the primaries, they should set a date and vote it in to law, saying this date is the earliest there can be any primary in any state. That will stop all this on up man ship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cobalt1999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Then all states would go on that date.
In effect a national primary day. It's still better than the current system though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Actually that's what the DNC did
Not a law, of course, but Party Rules.

And contrary to what others here think, the parties do control their own primaries.

FL has 30 days to work on a compromise solution. I feel it will happen. I do object though, coming from a state that complied with the Rules, if there are no penalties for breaking the rules.

On a related thought, and not directed at you, if people are unhappy with the DNC rules they can always run for a seat on the DNC from their state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cobalt1999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Which brings me back to my original question
Are the penalties legal and would they stand up in court? Does either side have an "ace in the hole" in this dispute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I don't think a court would touch it
But I'm not a lawyer.

I think it's an internal Party decision. The ultimate decider, if you will, is the convention as a whole. The Credentials Committee will present to the convention the Florida delegation to be seated (or not seated) and the convention delegates will vote to seat or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
8. We didn't have primaries until the 60s
Political parties can choose their nominee however they want.

Also two other things about the voting process may surprise you:

1. There is NO federal right to vote in ANY election. (there are rules about discrimination, etc. of course)

2. The constitution says that each state legislature can choose its presidential electors any way it wants. It so happens that all 50 states call for a popular vote election. So the legislature could decide to take away your "right" to vote for president with a simple law changing the means of selecting electors.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC