Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Pantheon is almost complete

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Scriptor Ignotus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 11:24 PM
Original message
The Pantheon is almost complete
Stevenson
Humphrey
McGovern
Mondale
Dukakis
Gore
Kerry
???

Better make up your mind soon folks. We didn't think there was anyway we would have lost in 2004, and wouldn't you know it, we did. Al Gore isn't going to ride in at dawn from the East, on top of a white mustang to save the day. It's up to the candidates that are out there now to win it all. I'm pretty sure if any of the Republicans win we'll be in WWIII before 2010. We're probably heading into a recession soon. Iraq is fucked if we stay or if we leave.

It's going to take someone really special to bring this country together.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. What a shining ray of optimism
you are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
draft_mario_cuomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. The only Democrats to win since 1960 were from the South
That should tell us something...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Huh. Interesting.
Edited on Sun Aug-26-07 11:33 PM by Gregorian
And it makes sense. I'll have to keep that in mind.

Thanks.


Edit- But in ref to the original post, Gore and Kerry did win. I know it's moot. But...

And point taken. I brought up 2004 loss in 2003 amidst choruses of boos. I absolutely cannot believe we could lose 08, but this country never ceases to amaze me in it's ever increasing lows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
draft_mario_cuomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. No problem
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Gore, certainly.
It's less clear to me that Kerry would have won without the cheating. Gore certainly did win. And he's from the South.

Which means Clinton, Edwards, or Obama, I guess. (Hawaii is pretty far south). :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. What should it tell us?
That the Democrats should only ever nominate southerners, or all eternity?

It's a meaningless statistic, like the kind sportscasters like to use. "He's 0 or 3 against left-handed pitchers in the 9th inning in post-season play in domed stadiums".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. It's not meaningless, but we shouldn't be constrained by it.
The reason only southern Democrats have won in the last 4 decades is because they can win a couple of southern states from the Republicans, which breaks their electoral edge (as I'm sure we're all aware). It's not an insignificant coincidence, like a lot of sports stats.

But I agree, we can find other strategies to win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-27-07 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. The question is
is that factoid predictive? I don't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-27-07 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. I don't agree that that's the question.
It can be predictive if it's ignored, but it doesn't have to be. No historical fact is predictive, but they are all useful in avoiding repetitive mistakes whose outcomes are predictable.

Not sure what we're doing here, other than playing word games. :) I doubt we really disagree on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
draft_mario_cuomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-27-07 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. We should bear in mind the GOP nominee will likely be from the northeast
Edited on Mon Aug-27-07 12:25 AM by draft_mario_cuomo
I have whoever made post #12 on ignore so I can't address that. We should also take into account that of the three people most likely to become the GOP nominee two are from the northeast. Think about it. Imagine if we run a southern Democrat against a former New York City mayor or a former Massachusetts governor...

I agree with you. We should not vote for someone solely because of their region but it is also a big mistake to not factor in regional appeal when assessing electability. Who will sell more in Louisiana, North Carolina, Virginia, and Tennessee? A Chicagoan, New Yorker, or North Carolinian?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. Off-the-cuff, non-serious idea: change the constitution to create a "ruling council"
Edited on Sun Aug-26-07 11:27 PM by Heaven and Earth
which, ideally, everyone you named who is still alive would get elected to. How amazing would that be? Such a body would have wisdom and leadership coming out of every pore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. With Obama, America wins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. Someone with experience, good judgement, and no skeletons in the closet, eh?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Or
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Certainly
He'd be a logical consideration to get the Riff Raff out of the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. no skeletons? What's with the mask, then?
hmmmm? Silver Bullets? Isn't that what the DLC uses?
White horse? Isn't that a huge carbon footprint?
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Oh, C'mon!
His transportation uses biofuels and is 100% recyclable. He would have a Native American running mate. And when someone asks about the mask, we answer "The mask is part of an ongoing investigation."

He's a cinch!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
14. No one thought Lincoln would amount to much, but in the toughest of
circumstances, he pulled through pretty good.

The issues have turned against the Republicans since the second World War. They've had to buoy their recent election victories with cheating and right-wing kooks.

You can't sustain that across discourse on issues that drive voting patterns. And there's no evidence to suggest that one of our candidates will not in fact rise to greatness -- swiftly and persuasively.

We're part of that ascent, and each of us volunteers and votes as we can, and we have faith in the process to right itself and move on down the road.

"... with my maps and my faith in the distance, moving father on" -- sings Jackson Browne.

I say he's on a good journey and I say we go with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC