Scriptor Ignotus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-26-07 11:24 PM
Original message |
The Pantheon is almost complete |
|
Stevenson Humphrey McGovern Mondale Dukakis Gore Kerry ???
Better make up your mind soon folks. We didn't think there was anyway we would have lost in 2004, and wouldn't you know it, we did. Al Gore isn't going to ride in at dawn from the East, on top of a white mustang to save the day. It's up to the candidates that are out there now to win it all. I'm pretty sure if any of the Republicans win we'll be in WWIII before 2010. We're probably heading into a recession soon. Iraq is fucked if we stay or if we leave.
It's going to take someone really special to bring this country together.
|
ruggerson
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-26-07 11:26 PM
Response to Original message |
1. What a shining ray of optimism |
draft_mario_cuomo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-26-07 11:26 PM
Response to Original message |
2. The only Democrats to win since 1960 were from the South |
|
That should tell us something...
|
Gregorian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-26-07 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
Edited on Sun Aug-26-07 11:33 PM by Gregorian
And it makes sense. I'll have to keep that in mind.
Thanks.
Edit- But in ref to the original post, Gore and Kerry did win. I know it's moot. But...
And point taken. I brought up 2004 loss in 2003 amidst choruses of boos. I absolutely cannot believe we could lose 08, but this country never ceases to amaze me in it's ever increasing lows.
|
draft_mario_cuomo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-26-07 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
jobycom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-26-07 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
It's less clear to me that Kerry would have won without the cheating. Gore certainly did win. And he's from the South.
Which means Clinton, Edwards, or Obama, I guess. (Hawaii is pretty far south). :)
|
MonkeyFunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-26-07 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
12. What should it tell us? |
|
That the Democrats should only ever nominate southerners, or all eternity?
It's a meaningless statistic, like the kind sportscasters like to use. "He's 0 or 3 against left-handed pitchers in the 9th inning in post-season play in domed stadiums".
|
jobycom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-26-07 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
15. It's not meaningless, but we shouldn't be constrained by it. |
|
The reason only southern Democrats have won in the last 4 decades is because they can win a couple of southern states from the Republicans, which breaks their electoral edge (as I'm sure we're all aware). It's not an insignificant coincidence, like a lot of sports stats.
But I agree, we can find other strategies to win.
|
MonkeyFunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-27-07 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
|
is that factoid predictive? I don't think so.
|
jobycom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-27-07 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #16 |
17. I don't agree that that's the question. |
|
It can be predictive if it's ignored, but it doesn't have to be. No historical fact is predictive, but they are all useful in avoiding repetitive mistakes whose outcomes are predictable.
Not sure what we're doing here, other than playing word games. :) I doubt we really disagree on this.
|
draft_mario_cuomo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-27-07 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
18. We should bear in mind the GOP nominee will likely be from the northeast |
|
Edited on Mon Aug-27-07 12:25 AM by draft_mario_cuomo
I have whoever made post #12 on ignore so I can't address that. We should also take into account that of the three people most likely to become the GOP nominee two are from the northeast. Think about it. Imagine if we run a southern Democrat against a former New York City mayor or a former Massachusetts governor...
I agree with you. We should not vote for someone solely because of their region but it is also a big mistake to not factor in regional appeal when assessing electability. Who will sell more in Louisiana, North Carolina, Virginia, and Tennessee? A Chicagoan, New Yorker, or North Carolinian?
|
More Than A Feeling
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-26-07 11:26 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Off-the-cuff, non-serious idea: change the constitution to create a "ruling council" |
|
Edited on Sun Aug-26-07 11:27 PM by Heaven and Earth
which, ideally, everyone you named who is still alive would get elected to. How amazing would that be? Such a body would have wisdom and leadership coming out of every pore.
|
Colobo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-26-07 11:27 PM
Response to Original message |
4. With Obama, America wins. |
jobycom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-26-07 11:39 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Someone with experience, good judgement, and no skeletons in the closet, eh? |
ruggerson
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-26-07 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
jobycom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-26-07 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
He'd be a logical consideration to get the Riff Raff out of the White House.
|
Capn Sunshine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-26-07 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. no skeletons? What's with the mask, then? |
|
hmmmm? Silver Bullets? Isn't that what the DLC uses? White horse? Isn't that a huge carbon footprint? :)
|
jobycom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-26-07 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
|
His transportation uses biofuels and is 100% recyclable. He would have a Native American running mate. And when someone asks about the mask, we answer "The mask is part of an ongoing investigation."
He's a cinch!
|
saltpoint
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-26-07 11:49 PM
Response to Original message |
14. No one thought Lincoln would amount to much, but in the toughest of |
|
circumstances, he pulled through pretty good.
The issues have turned against the Republicans since the second World War. They've had to buoy their recent election victories with cheating and right-wing kooks.
You can't sustain that across discourse on issues that drive voting patterns. And there's no evidence to suggest that one of our candidates will not in fact rise to greatness -- swiftly and persuasively.
We're part of that ascent, and each of us volunteers and votes as we can, and we have faith in the process to right itself and move on down the road.
"... with my maps and my faith in the distance, moving father on" -- sings Jackson Browne.
I say he's on a good journey and I say we go with him.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:39 AM
Response to Original message |