Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Attention Democratic candidates: Iran is NOT developing an atomic bomb!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-30-07 11:12 PM
Original message
Attention Democratic candidates: Iran is NOT developing an atomic bomb!
Edited on Thu Aug-30-07 11:30 PM by IndianaGreen
Here we go again! The Bush/Cheney regime is using the mushroom cloud fearmongering to arouse passions in support of a US attack on Iran, just as they did in the run up to the Iraq war in 2002 and early 2003. They have been joined in this endeavour by the same cast of characters that helped sell the Iraq war on a frightened American public: Republican neocons and their Democratic neoliberal allies, the Christian Right, the Israel Lobby.

It is disturbing to see and hear Democratic candidates on the stump using bellicose language against Iran, such as "all options are on the table," and hinting by at least one leading candidate that the use of tactical nukes are an acceptable option to be considered. It is alarming to see the same Democratic candidates accept the Administration's claims of an Iranian military nuclear program with the same unquestioned faith by which they accepted similar claims about Iraq.

Let us remember that it was Bush who ordered the UN to pull the IAEA inspectors from Iraq so that Bush could have his war of choice. Let's not repeat the mistakes of the past. Let us support the work being done by IAEA, and let's oppose the Bush Administration's war rhetoric which would drive any reasonable person to acquire nuclear weapons as a deterrent to having their country become the next Iraq.

Attention Democratic candidates: Iran is NOT developing an atomic bomb! Don't fall for the war propaganda, whether it comes from the White House, the pulpits, or Jerusalem. Demand solid and verifiable intelligence. Remember that Bush has politicized our intelligence services, driving underground the critical analysis of dedicated intelligence professionals. Remember that in Iraq, Bush made the intelligence "fit the policy," at the cost of nearly 4,000 American lives.

Let's stand for peace and against war, before Bush plunges our nation into a biblical Armageddon.

IAEA: Iran Cooperating In Nuclear Investigation

By John Ward Anderson and Joby Warrick
Washington Post Foreign Service
Friday, August 31, 2007; Page A10


PARIS, Aug. 30 -- The United Nations nuclear watchdog agency gave an upbeat assessment of Iranian cooperation with international inspectors in a new report Thursday that could make it more difficult for the United States to win tougher U.N. sanctions against Iran.

The report by the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna also concluded that while Iran continues to enrich uranium in violation of U.N. Security Council resolutions, its fuel enrichment plant has produced "well below the expected quantity for a facility of this design." The quality of the uranium also was lower than expected, the IAEA said.

<snip>

Iran claims that its nuclear program is entirely peaceful and intended to generate electricity, while the United States and numerous other Western countries contend it is secretly aimed at developing nuclear weapons. The report suggests that if Iran adheres to the program and timelines, the agency could resolve its remaining questions about the nature of the country's nuclear program by the end of the year and close the file.

"For the first time in a couple of years, we have been able to agree with the Iranians on a working arrangement, on how to resolve the outstanding issues," the U.N. agency's deputy director, Olli Heinonen, told reporters in Vienna. "What Iran is now facing is actually a litmus test" on whether it will deliver what it has promised, because its failure to do so in the past triggered Security Council action, Heinonen said.

If the IAEA concludes that Iran has not engaged in a covert program to develop nuclear weapons, it could raise new questions about the quality of U.S. intelligence in the Middle East. The United States made the case for going to war against Iraq based on claims that Saddam Hussein had programs to develop nuclear technologies and other weapons of mass destruction, but U.S. forces found no evidence of such programs after invading the country.

Longtime observers of Iran's program were struck by the report's revelations of slow progress of uranium enrichment. Iran appears to be running well behind its own self-imposed schedule for building new centrifuge machines, and its existing machines are operating well below capacity.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/30/AR2007083000460.html?hpid=sec-world
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PDJane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-30-07 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Iran will stop being an enemy....
When the US decides it's not an enemy.

The biggest problem with Iran is that it insists on independence. The empire can't have that, y'see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-30-07 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. You are so right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaptBunnyPants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-31-07 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. True.
Iran is as much a threat to us as Iraq was. Neither country had ever attacked us, nor had they ever demonstrated a desire to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-30-07 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. deja vu
enough
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-30-07 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. Beyond the murder that will ensue...
A second problem will foment. When we invaded Iraq we created in Iraq a mass of people willing to kill themselves for the sake of defeating America. When we invade Iran, this will occur again. Now we will have two nations who's goal is to bomb our buildings and kill our soldiers. Worse yet, at least as I've seen, we will not be invading on the ground, but only commence an air attack. Umm... so we've stopped "fighting them there so we don't have to fight them here?" What we're doing is creating chaos as a means to foment a population of people that are highly motivated to kill Americans. As a result, we will be more likely, not less, to be attacked in the future.

Please tell me that I'm wrong. I really want to be wrong.

Maybe we should all start dusting off those Cold War bomb shelters. This is going to be a bumpy ride.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-30-07 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. did you read Obama's oped with his call for diplomacy today?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-31-07 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Yes, Obama wants to poke them in the eye instead of hit them with a bat.
Edited on Fri Aug-31-07 12:31 AM by John Q. Citizen
Some call that diplomacy. Brownback is also cosponsor of the "Poke Them In The Eye, Instead of Hit Them With A Bat Act of 2007."

Who said diplomacy and bipartisanship can't work?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-31-07 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Hit Iran Where it Hurts...just imagine being an Iranian and
reading that one of the presidential candidates penned an article with this name?

And here is what another presidential candidate has said...

"At the top of these threats is Iran. Iran threatens the security of Israel and the entire world."


They must be looking forward to our new president :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaptBunnyPants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-31-07 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. His policy is still antagonistic.
We don't need tough guy rhetoric and trying to economically strangle Iran isn't a good strategy, either. They haven't done anything to deserve retribution from us and I for one am sick of the idea that if we don't like your government we have a free hand to destabilize you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-31-07 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
6. K&R Only one candidate has asked for proof, the other
candidates should follow.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-31-07 01:57 AM
Response to Original message
9. I beg to differ - watch Biden discuss Iran at the CNN debate
In a little over 1 minute he told us basically the same thing
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-LISgWet3eU

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-31-07 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. A rational response from Biden, which took me by surprise
and quite different from the warmongering speech that Hillary gave to AIPAC in January.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-31-07 02:32 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. She needs the Mid-East war bucks too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-31-07 02:38 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Biden will tell you the truth as he knows it, and he won't pander to get your vote.
Here are his comments to an American-Israeli group

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/US-Israel/Biden.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MLFerrell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-31-07 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
13. Even if Iran WERE building nuclear weaponry, so what?
We have thousands, and Israel (the only conceivable reason that the U.S. might even REMOTELY care) likely has several hundred.

Who gives a shit if Iran does eventually develop a half-dozen fission devices?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat2thecore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-31-07 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
16. Well said, IndianaGreen -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-31-07 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
17. Amen, IG! n/t
PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-01-07 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
18. Iran Says IAEA Atom Report Shows US Charges Wrong
Published on Thursday, August 30, 2007 by Reuters

Iran Says IAEA Atom Report Shows US Charges Wrong

by Mark Heinrich


VIENNA - Iran’s uranium enrichment program is operating well below capacity and is far from producing nuclear fuel in significant amounts, according to a confidential U.N. nuclear watchdog report obtained by Reuters.

A senior Iranian nuclear official said the International Atomic Energy Agency’s (IAEA) report showed U.S. suspicions about Tehran’s nuclear intentions were baseless.

<snip>

Western leaders suspect Iran wants to build atom bombs, not generate electricity, and were alarmed when Tehran said in April it had reached “industrial capacity” to enrich uranium.

But the IAEA report said Tehran remained far short of that threshold. Iran had just under 2,000 centrifuges divided into 12 cascades, or interlinked units, of 164 machines each refining uranium at its underground Natanz plant as of August 19, it said.

A 13th cascade was being run test-run empty, another was stationary undergoing tests under vacuum and two more cascades were being assembled, said the report, sent to the IAEA’s 35-nation board of governors and U.N. Security Council members.

http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/08/30/3499/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-01-07 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
19. I can't recommend...
but I can :kick: this.


:kick::kick::kick::kick::kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC