Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Edwards: "...No more secret prisons, no more illegal spying on the American people..."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 03:08 AM
Original message
Edwards: "...No more secret prisons, no more illegal spying on the American people..."
"No more torture, or condoning torture..."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qgq-Itw8Des
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hieronymus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 03:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. Edwards is our best hope in '08.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
broadcaster Donating Member (105 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 03:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I'd like either Edwards or Kucinich based on ...
their willingness to confront corporate and
entrenched political power. I know that both men recognize
how corrupt---morally, economically, politically--our
alleged democratic government is.

In my view it is going to take far more than HRC in office
to change America's direction. We already see what an HRC
presidency would be like in the way Pelosi and Reid are
operating.

I personally believe that things domestically will have to
get a l.o.t. worse before mainstream, uninvolved Americans
will wake up.

Those who come to this site know already that we live in
a country that is anti-working man, anti family, anti anything
other than corporate profit, privatization of our national
infrastructure, and corporate power. Unfortunately, we have
few vocal advocates beyond Edwards and Kucinich, and watch:
MSM will continue to attack these individuals, as will the HRC
machine.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 04:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Thank you...
and Welcome to DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
broadcaster Donating Member (105 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 03:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I'd like either Edwards or Kucinich based on ...
their willingness to confront corporate and
entrenched political power. I know that both men recognize
how corrupt---morally, economically, politically--our
alleged democratic government is.

In my view it is going to take far more than HRC in office
to change America's direction. We already see what an HRC
presidency would be like in the way Pelosi and Reid are
operating.

I personally believe that things domestically will have to
get a l.o.t. worse before mainstream, uninvolved Americans
will wake up.

Those who come to this site know already that we live in
a country that is anti-working man, anti family, anti anything
other than corporate profit, privatization of our national
infrastructure, and corporate power. Unfortunately, we have
few vocal advocates beyond Edwards and Kucinich, and watch:
MSM will continue to attack these individuals, as will the HRC
machine.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katmondoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 03:13 AM
Response to Original message
2.  Good for Edwards
We need to keep up this kind of talk. Remind people constantly of how this Nation and it's people are being abused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CGowen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 05:05 AM
Response to Original message
6. Didn't Congress do something about the "illegal" thing recently? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 05:09 AM
Response to Original message
7. I'm Sure The Victims Will Be Glad To Know That They're Pencilled In For Jan. '09
Failure to impeach is complicity -- approval -- exoneration for the regime.

Edwards could open a mouth. He chooses not to do so.

----
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 05:12 AM
Response to Original message
8. Edwards and Kucinich are the ONLY hope for REAL CHANGE.
Our time is running out to change the self destructive direction of this country and the stop the the cataclysmic extinction of this world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 06:15 AM
Response to Original message
9. Considering Edwards is saying all the right things a Loyal American would want to hear
I am surprised (but not as surprised as I would have been before reading "I Will Bear Witness" by Victor Klemperer) he is not gaining more traction.

Hopefully, soon it will begin to show effect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. He's not saying Impeachment
No action, no traction.

---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Point taken. Can't argue with that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-03-07 03:08 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. He's neither in nor running for a House seat, and impeachment would be moot when he gained office
So why should he discuss it? It's irrelevant to the Presidential race
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
11. Edwards has shown how to get a message out first.
I heard him talking about a "green-collar" working class. Jobs for Americans in sustainable energy and development. He is often the first of the dems to hit back at the bushies, and I think Elizabeth is as good on the trail as John.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
12. Why didn't he think of this when he worked on the Patriot Act?
Given enough time he comes around to the right conclusion. I don't trust him to make the correct choice when first confronted with a problem. He lacks leadership and judgment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-02-07 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
13. good stuff
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC