Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary only got two union endorsements this Labor Day week - still quite a race! :-)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 08:41 AM
Original message
Hillary only got two union endorsements this Labor Day week - still quite a race! :-)
http://thehill.com/campaign-2008/clinton-racks-up-2nd-labor-endorsement-.html

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) won her second labor union endorsement of the week, announcing Thursday that the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAM) is backing her bid for the Democratic nomination for president.

The IAM, an AFL-CIO union, has more than 700,000 members, and the campaign pointed out in a release Thursday that 450,000 of those members will be in 25 states voting on or before Feb. 5.

(N.B.,the union pres previously said "Hillary is focused on jobs...healthcare...education..trade" (union issues).)

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8RA5HL00&show_article=1


Clinton Picks Up Union Endorsement
Aug 28 01:16 PM US/Eastern
By JESSE J. HOLLAND
AP Labor Writer

Hillary Woos Union Workers

WASHINGTON (AP) - The United Transportation Union on Tuesday endorsed Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton for the Democratic nomination for president, the first national union endorsement of the 2008 campaign.

"The UTU has a long history of picking winners early. Hillary will be a president that America's working families can count on. Time and again, as a United States senator, she has stood with us," UTU President Paul Thompson said in a statement.

Clinton is leading in national polls for the Democratic nomination. She said that she was honored to get the endorsement.

"America's workers have been invisible to this administration, and it's time they had an advocate in the White House," said the New York senator.

The UTU, which calls itself the largest railroad operating union in North America, represents 125,000 active and retired members in the railroad, bus and public transit industries.

"Hillary Clinton's record has been friendly to working men and women of this country. She consistently has endorsed the necessity of a strong middle class," said the UTU's incoming president, Mike Futhey Jr. "The UTU will encourage its 125,000 active and retired members to support Hillary and other labor friendly candidates in 2008."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. What sell-outs to corporate insanity. The IAM used to be a very progressive union.
now they give their endorsement to a WTO/NAFTA corporate poodle?
Very sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Of the current candidates she is as for "fair trade" as any other - the union position. n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frazzled Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. If union endorsements meant much ...
Dick Gephardt would have been our nominee in 2004. He got the Steelworkers and all that.

Don't get me wrong: union endorsements are good. But they are no longer king-makers or deal-breakers.

The firefighters are apparently an exception, due to the reliable boots on the ground they provide in localities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. Gephardt got smacked because he couldn't win in Iowa...
That killed any chance he may have had...

The Union vote really doesn't kick in until Michigan, Ohio, New York, Indiana, Illinois, Missouri, Pennsylvania, Washington and Oregon are in play....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
3. This ain't like the old IAM.... they did not take corporatism from anyone.
Anyone remember "Wimpy" Winpisinger? (anything but wimpy).

1977: "Wimpy" is elected the IAM's 11th International President.
1979: The Citizen/Labor Energy Coalition ("Wimpy" as founder and president) launches first "Stop Big Oil" day to protest "obscene" profits by oil conglomerates while American workers' paychecks continue to shrink.
1980: Winpisinger leads "walkout of some 300 delegates and alternates from the Democratic Convention to protest the ... nomination of Jimmy Carter for President. ” (Jimmy is way to the Left of Hillary, god, what would he say now? Probably spinning in his grave)
1980: IAM media project begins: thousands of IAM members and their families monitor prime-time TV to determine media's portrayal of working people and unions.
1980: Winpisinger writes Trade Union View of U. S. Manpower Policy.
1981: "Wimpy" directs IAM lawsuit filing "against the OPEC oil cartel, charging them with artificially fixing the price of petroleum.
1983: WWW co-authors (with Jane Slaughter) Concessions & How to Beat Them.
1983: IAM introduces "Rebuilding America" act to Congress as alternative to Reaganomics and to rebuild nation’s industrial base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EndElectoral Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. With her record on trade I am surprised she got any.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. She is on board "fair trade - not free trade" and voted against CAFTA n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EndElectoral Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Can you name a single bill she sponsored for "fair" trade? Rhetoric without action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yes - On Oman the new labor laws and their enforcement was reason to vote yes - "ontheissues" has
the details reprinted below

http://www.ontheissues.org/International/Hillary_Clinton_Free_Trade.htm

Voted against CAFTA despite Bill Clinton's pushing NAFTA
In June 2005, Hillary voted with the bulk of her party against the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA). While the vote smacked of hypocrisy for many Democratic senators, it was particularly so for Ms. Clinton, whose husband had staked his administration's prestige on pushing NAFTA through Congress. Hillary also voted against giving the president the authority to submit trade agreements for fast-track approval--Bill Clinton pleaded with Congress annually, & in vain, for just such authority
Source: Condi vs. Hillary, by Dick Morris, p. 85 Oct 11, 2005

Voted YES on free trade agreement with Oman.
Vote on final passage of a bill to implement the United States-Oman Free Trade Agreement.

* Opponents of the bill say to vote NAY because: International trade can confer tremendous benefits on all of its participants. Unfortunately, the Oman Free Trade Agreement fails to live up to that potential.
* In 2001, the US entered into a similar trade agreement with the country of Jordan. The agreement was heralded for its progressive labor standards. However, we have recently seen in Jordan instances of foreign workers forced into slave labor, stripped of their passports, denied their wages, and compelled to work for days without rest.
* These incidents have been occurring in Jordan because Jordanian labor laws preclude protections for foreign workers. My fear in Oman is that they have far weaker labor standards, and that would lend itself to even worse conditions than in Jordan.
* When our trade partners are held to different, less stringent standards, no one is better off. When Omani firms can employ workers in substandard conditions, the Omani workers and American workers both lose. The playing field is not level.

* Proponents of the bill say to vote YEA because: The Oman Free Trade Agreement sends a very important message that the US strongly supports the economic development of moderate Middle Eastern nations. This is a vital message in the global war on terrorism.
* Since the end of WWII, the US has accepted nonreciprocal trade concessions in order to further important Cold War and post-Cold War foreign policy objectives. Examples include offering Japan and Europe nonreciprocal access to American markets during the 1950s in order to strengthen the economies of our allies and prevent the spread of communism.
* Oman is quickly running out of oil and, as a result, has launched a series of measures to reform its economy. This free-trade agreement immediately removes Oman's uniform 5% tariff on US goods.

Reference: United States-Oman Free Trade Agreement; Bill S. 3569 ; vote number 2006-190 on Jun 29, 2006

Voted NO on implementing CAFTA for Central America free-trade.
Approves the Dominican Republic-Central America-United States-Free Trade Agreement entered into on August 5, 2005, with the governments of Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua (CAFTA-DR), and the statement of administrative action proposed to implement the Agreement. Voting YES would:

* Progressively eliminate customs duties on all originating goods traded among the participating nations
* Preserve US duties on imports of sugar goods over a certain quota
* Remove duties on textile and apparel goods traded among participating nations
* Prohibit export subsidies for agricultural goods traded among participating nations
* Provide for cooperation among participating nations on customs laws and import licensing procedures
* Recommend that each participating nation uphold the Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work
* Urge each participating nation to obey various international agreements regarding intellectual property rights

Reference: Central America Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act; Bill HR 3045 ; vote number 2005-209 on Jul 28, 2005

Voted YES on establishing free trade between US & Singapore.
Vote to pass a bill that would put into effect a trade agreement between the US and Singapore. The trade agreement would reduce tariffs and trade barriers between the US and Singapore. The agreement would remove tariffs on goods and duties on textiles, and open markets for services The agreement would also establish intellectual property, environmental and labor standards.
Reference: US-Singapore Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act; Bill S.1417/HR 2739 ; vote number 2003-318 on Jul 31, 2003

Voted YES on establishing free trade between the US and Chile.
Vote to pass a bill that would put into effect a trade agreement between the US and Chile. The agreement would reduce tariffs and trade barriers between the US and Chile. The trade pact would decrease duties and tariffs on agricultural and textile products. It would also open markets for services. The trade pact would establish intellectual property safeguards and would call for enforcement of environmental and labor standards.
Reference: US-Chile Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act; Bill S.1416/HR 2738 ; vote number 2003-319 on Jul 31, 2003

Voted NO on extending free trade to Andean nations.
HR3009 Fast Track Trade Authority bill: To extend the Andean Trade Preference Act, to grant additional trade benefits under that Act, and for other purposes. Vote to pass a bill that would enlarge duty-free status to particular products from Colombia, Bolivia, Peru, and Ecuador, renew the president's fast-track authority and reauthorize and increase a program to make accessible retraining and relocation assistance to U.S. workers hurt by trade agreements. It would also approve a five-year extension of Generalized System of Preferences and produce a refundable 70 percent tax credit for health insurance costs for displaced workers.
Reference: Bill HR.3009 ; vote number 2002-130 on May 23, 2002

Voted YES on granting normal trade relations status to Vietnam.
Vote to grant annual normal trade relations status to Vietnam. The resolution would allow Vietnamese imports to receive the same tariffs as those of other U.S. trading partners.
Reference: Bill HJRES51 ; vote number 2001-291 on Oct 3, 2001

Voted YES on removing common goods from national security export rules.
Vote to provide the president the authority to control the export of sensitive dual-use items for national security purposes. The bill would eliminate restrictions on the export of technology that is readily available in foreign markets.
Reference: Bill S149 ; vote number 2001-275 on Sep 6, 2001

Rated 17% by CATO, indicating a pro-fair trade voting record.
Clinton scores 17% by CATO on senior issues

The mission of the Cato Institute Center for Trade Policy Studies is to increase public understanding of the benefits of free trade and the costs of protectionism.

The Cato Trade Center focuses not only on U.S. protectionism, but also on trade barriers around the world. Cato scholars examine how the negotiation of multilateral, regional, and bilateral trade agreements can reduce trade barriers and provide institutional support for open markets. Not all trade agreements, however, lead to genuine liberalization. In this regard, Trade Center studies scrutinize whether purportedly market-opening accords actually seek to dictate marketplace results, or increase bureaucratic interference in the economy as a condition of market access.

Studies by Cato Trade Center scholars show that the United States is most effective in encouraging open markets abroad when it leads by example. The relative openness and consequent strength of the U.S. economy already lend powerful support to the worldwide trend toward embracing open markets. Consistent adherence by the United States to free trade principles would give this trend even greater momentum. Thus, Cato scholars have found that unilateral liberalization supports rather than undermines productive trade negotiations.

Scholars at the Cato Trade Center aim at nothing less than changing the terms of the trade policy debate: away from the current mercantilist preoccupation with trade balances, and toward a recognition that open markets are their own reward.

The following ratings are based on the votes the organization considered most important; the numbers reflect the percentage of time the representative voted the organization's preferred position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. Did she promise more bombers or something?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC