John Kerry: The Escalation Didn't Work - blogging at HuffPo

[Adelante]

The escalation failed to do the one and only thing it was supposed to do. The entire Iraq policy of George W. Bush has failed since the fall of Saddam Hussein's statue in Baghdad. No amount of parsing or spinning can change those simple facts: the escalation is and was the wrong answer.

I chaired a hearing on the GAO Report yesterday, the report that stated that Iraqi civilians overall aren't any safer, that the political benchmarks aren't being met in Iraq, that, in short, none of the rationales for the escalation in Iraq have come to pass. It unfolds with maddening, enraging regularity: the Administration claims goals for their policy, they gradually back off of those goals and substitute smaller, less easily measured goals, and then muddy the waters hopelessly on whether even those modest new goals have been met. Time and again we've been through this.

That's why the Congress set up some clear benchmarks to measure what's happening in Iraq. Mitch McConnell praised the "clarity" those benchmarks brought to the debate. "Just wait until September," they all said. "We put in these meaningful benchmarks, we can judge in September."

Well, how do they judge those benchmarks now? Only three of 18 have been met. Another four were "partially met," which sounds like a "Gentleman's C" if I've ever heard of one (and, for anyone who saw my college transcript, I have).

Judgment time is here, and the only verdict is the same one we had in January, the same one we've had for a long time in Iraq: the Bush policy is a tragic failure. It's a policy that not only isn't working; it can't work. A political solution in Iraq cannot come about without a clear deadline on where our troops will be pulling out. Only Iraqis can end this civil war, and they aren't - and won't be - making any progress with an open-ended, massive presence by our military in their country.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-kerry/the-escalation-didnt-wor_b_63167.html

[2rth2pwr]

1. "I'll be working continuously this month trying to set a deadline to force a new policy in Iraq. "

What policy is he talking about? Immediate withdrawal is not hard to type.

[Mass]

5. Getting 67 votes for it is hard to do.

[PDJane]

2. I have a problem with "benchmarks" and "winning"

This is, I suppose, because I'm not an American and don't get the same bombardment from the media every day.

How in the name of all that's sacred or profane do you "win" an illegal occupation? Yes, it is illegal. Both the UN and a German court have said so. How do you get to be so privileged that you, the occupier of a sovereign country get to install on illegitimate government, start working on installing a second because you don't like the first, and then tell the government that you have installed that they have to meet "benchmarks" in order to convince you to leave.....when you haven't done one thing towards restoring or keeping order, protecting the people or the culture, and have polluted the land beyond use?

The US has become a nuclear-armed rogue state.

[Mass]

6. Which is why Kerry is advocating a firm deadline to get out of Iraq.

[PDJane]

7. OK, he wants a deadline.

The reason he gives is still things like benchmarks and the surge not working......of course the surge didn't work. Naturally, the Iraqis didn't meet benchmarks. Why the heck did anyone think it would work?

YOU CAN'T 'WIN' AN OCCUPATION.

This is an illegitimate, ill-advised sally into a sovereign nation in the name of raping the resources and killing civilians.

Never mind the deadlines. Get out NOW. Leave, pay the butcher's bill, and get on with repairing your own country's credit rating and infrastructure.

[jillan]

3. Thanks - going to go there now!

Kerry!!!

[hibiscus]

4. K & R n/t

[LittleClarkie]

8. I just went over there and registered

This was my motivation. Thanks.