Clintonista2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-05-07 10:04 PM
Original message |
What do you think about diverting public school money towards private religious schools? |
|
...that's what the Conservative party vows to do if it wins the Ontario election (which looks rather likely). I never thought I would say this but, Canadian politicians are officially more fucked up than American ones.
|
CaliforniaPeggy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-05-07 10:07 PM
Response to Original message |
|
But (perhaps appropriately) HELL NO!:puke:
|
MADem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-05-07 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Or better still "Jesus H. Christ!! HELL, no!!!" NT |
polichick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-05-07 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
Az
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-05-07 10:12 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Um... There are people here trying to do away with the public education system and replace it with religious education. They just don't have the clout to do it yet.
|
Clintonista2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-05-07 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
9. Well, the way I see it... |
|
Your religious nuts are very very loud, and that's how they function. Ours are much smarter, they work behind the scenes, they don't promote the fundamentalism up front.
|
Az
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-05-07 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
A lot of schools got caught by stealth creationists that got on school boards and other positions. They brought creationism into the schools but were met with vociferous opposition. They have gained ground but they have not yet won the day.
|
More Than A Feeling
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-05-07 10:13 PM
Response to Original message |
4. *to the tune of 'Big Ben'* No No No No...No No No Noooooooooo! |
|
Edited on Wed Sep-05-07 10:13 PM by Heaven and Earth
NO NO!
|
madfloridian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-05-07 10:14 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Florida does it already. |
datadiva
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-05-07 10:15 PM
Response to Original message |
6. That 10% tithe at church should pay for it |
AX10
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-05-07 10:15 PM
Response to Original message |
7. WTF? The cons are going to win in Ontario? |
|
:wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf::wtf:v
No way in HELL should this be allowed!
|
Clintonista2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-05-07 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. The liberals are becoming more and more unpopular |
|
After Mcguintys broken "no taxes" promise.
|
napi21
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-05-07 10:18 PM
Response to Original message |
11. It's a bad idea and even most of the religious schools here in the US |
|
don't want it either. Yes, some of the Shrub loving ones take it if they can, but I've talked to quite a few pople involved with religious schools AND religious charities too, and they all said they weren't interested. When I asked why, they all said because there would be strings attached, no matter what the politicians said, and they didn't want that!
|
defendandprotect
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-05-07 10:19 PM
Response to Original message |
12. I think it's an impeachable offense to the Constitution --- |
Thothmes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-06-07 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
Why do you think that an action in Ontario Canada is an impeachable offense under our Constitution?
|
defendandprotect
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-07-07 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
22. OF COURSE . . .. I was responding to the original question . .. . |
|
Which was:
What do you think about diverting public school money towards private religious schools?
And to the other poster who mentioned US schools --
Unfortunately, we do now have US taxpayer money subsidizing religions -- in many ways, including religious schools.
Therefore, my comment ---
|
mzteris
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-05-07 10:25 PM
Response to Original message |
|
absol-fing-lutely HELL NO!
|
Captain Hilts
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-05-07 10:26 PM
Response to Original message |
14. I thought Eleanor Roosevelt and Cardinal Spellman duked it out on this over 50 yrs ago. nt |
historian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-05-07 10:41 PM
Response to Original message |
|
If you want your child in a religious school pay for it!!!!
|
madmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-06-07 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #16 |
The2ndWheel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-06-07 11:11 AM
Response to Original message |
19. If the public wants that, and votes for those saying they will do it |
|
isn't that how it's supposed to work?
|
amandabeech
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-06-07 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #19 |
20. In the U.S., you'd have to overcome the First Amendment establishment |
|
clause that essentially says that the government shall not establish any religion.
Here in the U.S. the Constitution trumps the voters on that issue. Courts would rule that using public money to fund a school that teaches or is heavily linked to a particular religion violates the First Amendment.
I believe that this may be an issue with the Arabic school in New York and a school oriented toward Israel and teaching Hebrew in Florida, I believe.
What the situation is in Canada, I don't know.
|
Clintonista2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-06-07 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #19 |
21. At one point the public wanted slavery |
|
is that the way it's supposed to work?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:31 PM
Response to Original message |