bermudat
(985 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-06-07 07:43 AM
Original message |
| 'Democrats try to woo the GOP on Iraq Policy'-What's wrong with this title? |
|
This is front page of the NY Times and it seems to make the Dems seem conciliatory and waffly already. This war is an affront and is bankrupting our nation. The majority of Americans side with the Dems on this issue. Why use 'woo', why not demand a change in Iraq policy?
|
| Atman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-06-07 07:50 AM
Response to Original message |
| 1. We are sooooooooooo fucked. |
| ccpup
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-06-07 07:52 AM
Response to Original message |
|
you're reading the NY Times and their decision to use the word "woo" should not be construed as the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. It really is amazing how one simple word can completely misinform people! With a media like this, we may never have a clear idea of how hard (or not) the Dems tried to muscle the WH on Iraq.
|
| Donkeykick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-06-07 07:53 AM
Response to Original message |
| 3. I believe it is because... |
|
at any moment public opinion can change about the war. The whole thing needs to be handled with care.
|
| msongs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-06-07 09:08 AM
Response to Original message |
| 4. paper tiger, paper tiger...here kitty kitty nt |
| Romulox
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-06-07 09:09 AM
Response to Original message |
| 5. It's payback for the GOP lending the Dems their trade policy...nt |
| niceypoo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-06-07 09:17 AM
Response to Original message |
| 6. Translation: Bush Lite |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:58 AM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
