Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Elizabeth Edwards supports AFSCME workers strike @ U of M

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Sapphire Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 01:34 PM
Original message
Elizabeth Edwards supports AFSCME workers strike @ U of M
Elizabeth Edwards adds star power to U of M strike


A noon rally by striking members of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Union on Wednesday had been scheduled to take place directly in front of the University of Minnesota Administration building.

But minutes before it was to begin the rally was moved down onto the grassy Northrup Mall, the usual hangout for studying and sleeping undergraduates.

The big surprise was not where it was held, but who showed up to speak.

Braving the heat and humidity in a grey suit, Elizabeth Edwards, wife of presidential candidate John Edwards, showed up to lend support. She told the sign-waving strikers and their supporters, "If they respect you and believe in your dignity, they're going to provide you with this raise!"

(snip)

Edwards delighted the strikers and their supporters with the kind of remarks that have won organized labor endorsements for her Democratic candidate husband, John.

"Every person who works in this country, the conditions under which they work are better because the unions are strong, because you all stand together."

(snip)

She continued to speak with reporters as she left the mall insisting, "The very idea that they're not meeting the cost of inflation in terms of their cost of living increases, that they're excusing those cost of living increases by saying 'oh, we have that money someplace else', I mean, everybody knows that's a fraud! It's a matter of respecting these workers. If this university respects these workers, they would absolutely give them the cost of living increase. This is just to keep up with inflation for Pete's sakes! This is not asking for the moon."


http://www.kare11.com/news/news_article.aspx?storyid=264007



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Fantastic! Elizabeth and John
are my heroes. Thanks!

K&R!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. REC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. that Union is asking for an awful lot
13% over two years? That is far over inflation. And originally they asked for 12% plus the step increases?

Even 8.5% over 2 years sounds generous next to the 6.1% I am getting. The inflation rate over the last two years is only 6.7% and it is running at 2.5% this year.
http://data.bls.gov/PDQ/servlet/SurveyOutputServlet?data_tool=latest_numbers&series_id=CUUR0000SA0&output_view=pct_12mths

What is their starting wage now, I wonder. I think the step increases should be included in the total - they are part of what the worker will actually take home. The Union seems a little greedy here. 8.5% is worth striking over?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapphire Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Negotiations - Issues & Facts | Steps are not Cost-of-Living Increases
Negotiations - Issues & Facts : http://www.afscme3937.org/negot_faq.shtml

Steps are not Cost-of-Living Increases: http://www.afscme3800.org/node/59

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. best estimate I can find
says they make (on average) $31,000 a year or $15.
This article says that a 1% increase means $1.1 million and that 3,500 are on strike. So 100% is $110 million divided by 3,500 is $31,000 (rounded down)
http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2007/09/05/uofmstrike/

$15 an hour is pretty good money from where I sit. A step increase IS an increase in pay, even if it is not a COLA. There's one exception to that - people who are at the top. If there are only ten steps then people at step 10 do not get the step increase. People at the top have been there a long time. Why? Because it's a good paying job. Their experience is valuable but too many times I have seen their work ethic stink. Especially if it is almost impossible to fire them.

They still get bigger raises than people at the bottom. Take a person making $50,000 a year and one making $20,000 a year (for the average of $35,000). The top person gets a COLA of $1125. The bottom person only gets $950 - $450 for a COLA and $500 for a step. I cannot cry for the person making $50,000. My Minnesota degree never got me half of that. So I vote against a strike.

Just my 2 cents (which is now $1.37 due to inflation).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. I use to belong to Afscme and I wouldn't have minded her walking with us.
of course we never went on strike but, you get the spirit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. Have this union endorsed a candidate yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. When she was in Michigan in 2004
she came to the "edge of civilization" here in the north. She did a health care forum and we had a nurse in attendance who was part of the longest nurses strike (ever in the history of the world or something like that). EE had her stand and be reconginzed & supported. It was a really great moment. She also spoke strongly in support of the striking nurses.

Of course with Bonior from MI playing such a large role in the Edwards campaign, MI labor is already leaning Edwards' way.

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
8. Why is Elizabeth campaigning for John?
Double standard much?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inspired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Good Lord.
Of course she is campaigning for John. I know where you are going with this and there is simply no comparison. Nice try.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. How is there no comparison?
If Bill did exactly what Elizabeth did, there would be outrage on DU over Bill "campaigning for Hillary"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapphire Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I'd LOVE to see Bill Clinton out supporting striking workers!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. So would I, unfortunatley, many DUers would not
It would hurt them politically, which is why you constantly seeing them shout "BILL SHOULD STOP CAMPAIGNING FOR HILLARY!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapphire Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Has he ever supported striking workers? Has Hillary?
Who would it hurt politically? And what would his supporting striking workers have to do w/campaigning for Hillary?

Did he campaign for Gore? For Kerry? I do remember his saying that he liked both these guys (Kerry & bush), and wondered if he was the only person who did.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC