Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tucker Carlson: John Edwards isn't getting the nomination because he has Pacific's

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 05:06 PM
Original message
Tucker Carlson: John Edwards isn't getting the nomination because he has Pacific's
My goodness what a dumb little FUCK!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Adsos Letter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Pacific's???
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. "Pacific's"? Are you sure it's not Atlantic?
Edited on Fri Sep-07-07 05:16 PM by durrrty libby
:rofl:



"dumb little FUCK" They say it takes one to know one.

Pretty soon the freepers will be capturing screen shots from here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. Was he playing Monopoly?
If Edwards picks up the Reading Railroad he can still build that hotel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windy252 Donating Member (742 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. I don't know even know what Tucker is
talking about from this post. I'm confused more than anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. Tucker hates Dems
Kuch up now....and Tuck is grilling him with stupid stuff.

He's hit on Edwards, Michelle and 'Girly Man' Big Dog tonight....hmmmmm....msnbc is forced to put up the anti-Olbermann :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. Do you mean "pacifist"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Sorry............next
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. He has pacifists in a hug?
...by the neck?

...up a tree?

...by the bushel?

...in a tizzy?

Where's the OP, I demand an answer!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. truthfully, I have seen him take up for Edwards more than most in the msm
Edited on Fri Sep-07-07 05:47 PM by illinoisprogressive
I am not big into Tucker, heaven knows, but, sometimes he does come up with some real truths.
Late great Molly Ivens wrote about him being the only journalist to dig into a bit about Bush and wrote about bush's cavilier attitude about Carla Faye Tucker when everyone else gave bush a free pass and did not look too closely.
I have seen him be frustrated about the way Edwards has been treated and has said he likes him.
He is frustrated by our party gathering around cobwebs rather than open their eyes to some very good candidates and take Edwards seriously.
While the rest of the press is acting the same way about Hillary that they did with bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
11. Is Tucker now clairvoyant? (sp) He is a waste of precious space.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. He consistently holds the bottom in ratings for all the news shows
on the cable news networks....

Hardly ever attracting more than 80k eyeballs at a given time...

Kind of like Glenn Beck, who is in a race to the bottom with Tucker...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Isn't he somebody's nephew or something? I seem to remember hearing
that he is related to some big wheel, thus explaining why we are subjected to his idiocy.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 02:41 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. That would probably be a good explaination...
That he is the idiot child of some large owner of NBC and he wants so to be a pundit...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. Yes--Tucker's daddy is a GOP VIP
He set up Scooter Libby's defense fund, which Tucker didn't disclose until he was called on it on the grounds that he didn't think it was "relevant."

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Clairvoyant about what, though? Edwards having "Pacific's"???
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 01:36 AM
Response to Original message
14. "Specifics"?
:shrug: Tucker is an ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. That was my take.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 02:23 AM
Response to Original message
16. I am going to study this post, already has 14 responses and
no one seems to know what the hell it's about.

I wonder if it's the curiosity of trying to figure out what the hell "Pacific's" is
or the jarring "dumb little Fuck!!!!" that is causing the attention.

Could be that because the OP has disappeared it has made it even more intriguing.

??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TransitJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
18. I one time thought
that pacific's would be a good place to be in a snowstorm. Then I realized that dumb little FUCKS would probably make my snowstorm too bellicose. Goddammit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
20. oh the irony of you calling anyone a "dumb little fuck".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelly Rupert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
22. What the hell?
What on Earth do you mean by that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Netbeavis Donating Member (291 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
23. sounds like good strategery to me. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC