Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Criminal background checks on fundraising bundlers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 10:13 AM
Original message
Criminal background checks on fundraising bundlers
NEW YORK, Sept. 11 (UPI) -- Presidential hopeful Sen. Hillary Clinton's campaign said it will begin "vigorous" criminal background checks on its major fundraisers, it was reported Tuesday.

Clinton's campaign disclosed Monday night it is hiring additional staff members to check the backgrounds of the dozens of people, known as "bundlers," who raise thousands of dollars for a campaign, The New York Times reported.

-snip

Former Sen. John Edwards’ Democratic presidential campaign said it began doing background checks on bundlers after Hsu’s troubles surfaced. Democratic Sen. Barack Obama's campaign said it, too, vets donors, but didn't say if that included criminal checks, the Times said.


http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/Top_News/2007/09/11/clinton_campaign_to_return_money/2153/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Caution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. And why can't people with a crime in their past donate money to a political campaign?
Just another way of disenfranchising the rights of those with a "criminal" past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Do you know what a "bundler" is?
It is a donor that donates massive amounts of cash to a campaign by "bundling together" contributions he or she is able to collect from others.

My guess is that a campaign would take a legal contribution from any individual, but that "bundlers" will be checked out, so that ALL the money they are responsible for will not have to be returned in the event that there is a question about the legality of the genesis of the "bundle".

TC

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Broke Dad Donating Member (345 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Hsu used straw people to make the $850,000 donations to little Hill
Apparently little Hill is feeling the heat from Obama and she has to use fugitive felons to bundle and raise money for her.

It is a good thing her disciplined flawless campaign is finally going to do background checks on its bag men!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Except Hsu gave money and had others give money to Obama as well.
The Obama campaign donated the direct donations by Hsu to charity and was investigating other Hsu related money. I assume they have or in short order will return the other Hsu tainted cash. Neither campaign needs it.

Also in yet another example of John Edwards 2008 pretending John Edwards 2004 doesn't exist, Jefferey Flieger was arrested for illegally funneling nearly $200K for his 2004 run. Edawrds campaign claims he had no knowledge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Heh... best sentence fragment of the day:
Also in yet another example of John Edwards 2008 pretending John Edwards 2004 doesn't exist...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Exactly... and that's why I agree with the policy of background checks on bundlers.
I agree with you.

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. This should have been part of standard vetting of bundlers.
Lesson learned I guess. For some campaigns, a much harder one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. They can
but the campaign has the right to know up front about this past. If they feel that the person's life overall is such that it will not hurt them, they can still willingly accept the bundler. No one is speaking of checking out everyone who sends in a check.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC