Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

No Home Field Advantage for Romney in Massachusetts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 05:46 PM
Original message
No Home Field Advantage for Romney in Massachusetts
Mitt Romney (R)34%
Hillary Clinton (D)60%

Rudy Giuliani (R) 33%
Hillary Clinton (D)58%

Fred Thompson (R)27%
Hillary Clinton (D)61%



"If former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney wins the Republican Presidential nomination, he isn’t likely to deliver his home state’s Electoral Votes to the GOP.

A Rasmussen Reports telephone survey finds Romney trailing Democratic frontrunner Hillary Clinton by 26 percentage points, 60% to 34%. He also trails John Edwards by 21-points (54% to 33%) and Barack Obama by 18-points (54% to 36%).

Rudy Giuliani doesn’t fare any worse than Romney in the Bay State. The former Mayor of New York City trails Clinton 58% to 33%. The newest entrant into the Presidential race, former Tennessee Senator Fred Thompson, trails Clinton by and even larger margin—61% to 27%. "



http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/massachusetts_2008_presidential_election


Apparently there is no love lost for their former governor.The republican field is very weak

I wonder what kind of excuse he will come up with?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. He was a total disloyal asshat and we're glad he's gone!
He bashed Massachusetts every chance he got when he was traveling
all over the USA instead of being here and being the Gov! :grr:

The drive by Gov! :puke: Mitt the Shit! He stinks!!

I can just imagine how he'd be bashing the USA as president! :grr:

I don't think he has a snowballs chance in hell getting nominated.

Good! He sucks!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Those "Votes For Republicans" Are Really "Votes Against Clinton"
Romney couldn't get elected dog catcher here in Mass. Clinton might be elected to that post, depending on who else was running.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Honestly, that makes so little sense, it is almost sad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Please, Do Enlighten Us
As to why that makes so little sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC