Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Today's Bush Radio Address: "The troop surge is working"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-15-07 09:53 AM
Original message
Today's Bush Radio Address: "The troop surge is working"
President's Radio Address

For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
September 15, 2007



http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/09/20070915.html

THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. This week, General David Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan Crocker testified before Congress on the progress of America's strategy in Iraq, including the surge in forces. They agreed that our Coalition faces formidable challenges. Yet they also said that security conditions are improving, that our forces are seizing the initiative from the enemy, and that the troop surge is working.

Because of this progress, General Petraeus now believes we can maintain our security gains with fewer U.S. troops. He's recommended a force reduction of 5,700 troops in Iraq by Christmas, and he expects that by July we will be able to reduce our troop levels in Iraq further, from 20 combat brigades to 15. He's also recommended that in December we begin a transition to the next phase of our strategy in Iraq, in which our troops will shift over time from leading operations to partnering with Iraqi forces, and eventually to overwatching those forces.

I have accepted General Petraeus's recommendations. And I have directed that he and Ambassador Crocker deliver another report to Congress in March. At that time, they will provide a fresh assessment of the situation in Iraq and of the troop levels we need to meet our national security objectives. The principle that guides my decisions on troop levels is "return on success." The more successful we are, the more troops can return home. And in all we do, I will ensure that our commanders on the ground have the troops and flexibility they need to defeat the enemy.

Anbar Province is a good example of the progress we are seeing in Iraq. Last year, an intelligence report concluded that Anbar had been lost to al Qaeda. But local sheiks asked for our help to push back the terrorists -- and so we sent an additional 4,000 Marines to Anbar as part of the surge. Together, local sheiks, Iraqi forces, and Coalition troops drove the terrorists from the capital of Ramadi and other population centers. Today, citizens who once feared beheading for talking to our troops now come forward to tell us where the terrorists are hiding. And young Sunnis who once joined the insurgency are now joining the army and police.

The success in Anbar is beginning to be replicated in other parts of Iraq. In Diyala, a province that was once a sanctuary for extremists is now the site of a growing popular uprising against the extremists. In Baghdad, sectarian killings are down, and life is beginning to return to normal in many parts of the city. Groups of Shia extremists and Iranian-backed militants are being broken up, and many of their leaders are being captured or killed. These gains are a tribute to our military, to Iraqi forces, and to an Iraqi government that has decided to take on the extremists.

The success of a free Iraq is critical to the security of the United States. If we were to be driven out of Iraq, extremists of all strains would be emboldened. Al Qaeda could find new recruits and new sanctuaries. And a failed Iraq could increase the likelihood that our forces would someday have to return -- and confront extremists even more entrenched and even more deadly. By contrast, a free Iraq will deny al Qaeda a safe haven. It will counter the destructive ambitions of Iran. And it will serve as a partner in the fight against terrorism.

In this struggle, we have brave allies who are making great sacrifices to defeat the terrorists. One of these Iraqis was a man named Sheikh Abdul Sattar. He was one of the tribal leaders I met on my recent visit to Iraq, who was helping us to drive al Qaeda out of Anbar Province. His father was killed by al Qaeda in 2004. And when we met Sheikh Sattar, he told me, quote: "We have suffered a great deal from terrorism. We strongly support the democracy you have called for." Earlier this week, this brave tribal sheikh was murdered. A fellow Sunni leader declared: "We are determined to strike back and continue our work." We mourn the loss of brave Iraqis like Sheikh Sattar, and we stand with those who are continuing the fight.

If Iraq's young democracy can turn back its enemies, it will mean a more hopeful Middle East -- and a more secure America. So we will help the Iraqi people defeat those who threaten their future -- and also threaten ours.

Thank you for listening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Homer12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-15-07 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. When all their is left is lies......
Edited on Sat Sep-15-07 09:56 AM by Homer12
.....the house of cards has fallen.

Not even a half truth!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-15-07 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. So now he's bragging that the sheik with whom he met was killed?
Edited on Sat Sep-15-07 10:02 AM by BleedingHeartPatriot
He's loving the death and destruction, he is. MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Homer12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-15-07 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. You see the main allies death means that
...the insurgents are losing. Otherwise they wouldn't have targeted him.

I'm just using Bush logic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-15-07 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Success strikes again.
MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-15-07 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
5. Iraq is not young democracy - - Bush lied.
Iraq is an occupied nation, whose government is dictated to by Bush in the deep, while on the surface whitewashed with cunning and corruption.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-15-07 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
6. A trillion dollars and 6,000 troops (in the end) for less than nothing.
The Republican idea of success is wasting tons of money and lives to end up with less than nothing. Bush and his Republicans should hang their heads in shame for the rest of their lives. Every time they lift up their faces to the sunshine, there should be a voice in their heads shouting "Eyes down, failure!"

Bush and his Republicans think they will fool the American people into believing this disaster was worth it. Quack Dr. Bush's incompetence and lying cost us an eye and leg for no reason. So he gives us a glass eye, a prosthetic leg, and a big bill. Then he calls it all a success because we didn't die.

Later, under a new doctor, we lose the other eye a and the other leg. And Dr. Bush and his Republicans blame it on the new doctor.

Or so Bush and his Republicans think. They think they can just move on from this failure. But Americans aren't that stupid. The health of the country demands the truth. The little voice shouting "Eyes down, failure!" is getting louder and louder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC