|
Edited on Sat Sep-15-07 04:03 PM by Old Crusoe
must be huddled over the KoolAid pitcher exchanged despairing mumbles about how they're going to get their fannies whupped in 2008.
Given that fanny-whuppin', they might just as well run some halfway promising future ticket and give it some national exposure.
Or, call in a veteran and a rookie and let them do the best they can. John Danforth would be the least offensive living Republican, I think. He's not treasure, at least from a left-voting perspective, but as Republicans go, he at least can SPEAK on his own two feet and feed himself. Compared to Ted Stevens, Tom Coburn and Orrin Hatch, that's pretty remarkable.
And he's a certified minister from middle-of-the-country Missouri with an authoritative voice, etc. blah blah blah.
They'd have to PLACE him at the top of the ticket because the far-right fundie base would never ever nominate John Danforth. He's too "moderate" for them.
Danforth at the top of the ticket and Rob Portman as veep nom. That, or something like that, would be the Republicans' best hope, which gives us some reason to be optimistic, since it would never happen. The saliva-spewing fundies who slough and grunt their way to their polling places want numbskull candidates like Dubya and Reagan, or psychotic creeps like Poppy, Brownback and Willard, or philistine yahoos like Fred Thompson and Mike Huckabee.
Those three above categories often attract interchangeable candidates to them, so that their noms could be in one, two, or even all three of those categories simultaneously. DU readers should feel free to mix and match.
Gingrich as a late entry into the GOP field would confirm the desperation of the red team. They're done for in 2008 and privately, quietly, over a lukewarm cup of red Koolaid, they know it.
|