Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Biden Takes Gay Stance On Marriage. Not About Nups, Supports Civil Unions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 09:14 AM
Original message
Biden Takes Gay Stance On Marriage. Not About Nups, Supports Civil Unions
Democratic presidential contender Joe Biden toed party line this weekend when he said he supports civil unions, rather than full-fledged gay marriage.

Campaigning in Iowa, the senator from Delaware insisted the government must not define the allegedly sacred institution. “It is the responsibility of the government to be able to define for a religious-based organization what constitutes a marriage.” He prefers to leave such decision making to the states.

Biden’s comments were especially painful for many of Iowa’s gays, who had a brief shot at marriage two weeks ago when a state judge ruled the ban unconstitutional. That same judge later held his ruling, thus truncating the queers’ freedom.

Though not down with same-sex nuptials, Biden’s proposed health care reforms will apply to all citizens regardless of sexuality. He also described the discriminatory Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell as “bizarre”. His website elaborates:

Twenty-four of the nations serving alongside U.S. forces in Iraq permit open service, and it has no negative impact on their forces or the morale of the soldiers. Joe Biden believes turning away patriotic Americans who volunteer to serve solely because of their sexual orientation is wrong.



More:
http://www.queerty.com/politics/biden-takes-gay-stance-on-marriage-20070917/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. Did you omit the word "not" at the crucial juncture?
“It is the responsibility of the government to be able to define for a religious-based organization what constitutes a marriage.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC