Why the effort to keep private insurers in the mix? It's like subsidizing buggy makers.

[Phoebe Loosinhouse]

Their day is over. Their time has passed. They are slow, cumbersome and inefficient. They care about profits and CEO salaries over the health of their subscribers.

They could have done a better job IF THEY HAD CHOSEN TO. They chose not to. I am happy to fire them. We deserve better. Only Kucinich is strong enough to suggest the sweeping, not incremental, changes that are necessary to change the system - Single payer universal health.

One the 2 issues that matter the most to me - war and health - Kucinich is the best candidate.

[Le Taz Hot]

1. Check out Hillary's largest donars

and you'll have your answer.

[groovedaddy]

2. Exactly. You can't take their money and then tell them to fuck off!

SHE (and anyone else who takes their money) OWES THEM!

[bread_and_roses]

3. exactly. And they OWN her. (n/t)

[baldguy]

4. Its like subsidizing vampires to suck your blood.

[Phoebe Loosinhouse]

5. Nice one!

:hi:

[groovedaddy]

7. Your only choice: whose fangs go in the easiest?

As soon as I hear any candidate say "We want to make health care more affordable" I know they are in the Insurance companies' pockets and there will still be millions without insurance under such "plans."

[papau]

6. Obama/Edwards/Clinton/etc - except for DK - all use for profit insurance co's n/t

n/t

[killbotfactory]

8. Because they are a billion dollar industry with large amounts of lobbyists and cash

they can buy and sell politicians at their leisure.