Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Post-Oprah, Post-Hsu Clinton numbers: 47% (+2) Obama 25% (+1) in latest Gallup Poll

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 03:24 PM
Original message
Post-Oprah, Post-Hsu Clinton numbers: 47% (+2) Obama 25% (+1) in latest Gallup Poll
Gallup's latest Democratic numbers:

• Clinton, 47%, vs. 45% the first week of September.
• Obama, 25%, vs. 24%.
• John Edwards, 11%, down from 16%.

http://blogs.usatoday.com/onpolitics/2007/09/gallup-giuliani.html#more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. An interesting side note in that poll....
Giuliani is down to 30%. Looks like "None of the above" is still going strong on the (R) side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Has the obit for McCain been written a bit early? He's shown modest gains in various polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. Excellent. I love the fact that she is approaching 50%
:applause: :applause: :applause:


The fact that the republicans have such a crappy field is icing on the cake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. So when Edwards drops out and the undecideds go to Obama...
Edited on Tue Sep-18-07 03:58 PM by jenmito
it will be Hillary 47% vs. Obama 53%. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Unlikely given current polling


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. LOL
so you're pinning your hopes on EVERY undecided and Edwards voters to go for Obama? Good luck with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Nah...
I'll give 2% of them to Hillary. Obama 51% to Hillary 49%. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. Let's see what happens in Iowa and South Carolina.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. Edwards at 11%; Clinton at 11% more than Edwards and Obama combined.
Edited on Tue Sep-18-07 08:57 PM by calteacherguy
Impressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Polls at this stage are extremely reliable. Just ask Howard Dean or Mike Dukkakis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Apples and Oranges. This isn't 2004.
Edited on Tue Sep-18-07 09:06 PM by calteacherguy
Completely different candidates and dynamic. In my opinion, the extremely probable outcome of this race has been determined for some time.

Not that Obama isn't a fine individual; he is. I'll diplomatically withhold further comment on Edwards at this juncture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I always chuckle whe I see that meme "this isn't 2004"...
Let's look at 1992. Clinton was in the tank in polls at this time. Let's look at 1996. Phil Gramm was a shoe-in as GOP nominee in the polls at this time. Let's look at 1968. Muskie was obviously going to be the Democratic candidate. Let's look at 1976 when Henry Jackson was kickin' lil' ol' Jimmy Carter's butt in the polls. All of these "predictions" were four months out or less.

I could go on. As I look at the photo of President Gephardt on my desk, I....ah never mind.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Except the election cycle begins much, much earlier now.
And all of the top three are well-known.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. I won't let number dazzle me or make me change my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. You shouldn't. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-18-07 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Or John Kerry, he was behind until Iowa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC