This is hillarious, Tucker is in way over his head with Wes Clark. Watch

[EV_Ares]

if you can. Tucker is dumb as a doorknob.

[Adelante]

1. I don't get the channel

Tucker knows he's dumb as a doorknob, too, every time he interviews Wes :D

[EV_Ares]

2. Probably why he didn't have him on long. eom.

[DFW]

3. A battle of wits between Wes Clark and Tucker Carlson?

I didn't see it, but it's sort of like a footrace
between a cheetah and a garden slug: you don't have
to watch it to know the outcome.

[TheDebbieDee]

6. In a battle of wits between Tucker and anybody............

Tucker is unarmed!

[Joe Chi Minh]

4. It would be difficult to get a more bizarre mismatch than William Buckley

in that interview with Noam Chomsky on a video clip appearing here a while back. Buckley was sinking further and further into his seat, with a more and more drippy smirk on his face, and giving lamer and lamer questions and responses.

[Joe Chi Minh]

5. Too unilateral not to be an oxymoron.

[driver8]

7. Tucker is in way over his head with a wet sponge.

Who did he blow to get a television show?

[Sparkly]

8. I'm sorry I missed it. nt

[EV_Ares]

12. Do you actually enjoy seeing a one sided slaughter of someone

with intelligence against someone of no intelligence?

[Sparkly]

15. In Tucker's case, it sounds delightful. nt

[FrenchieCat]

9. Well, at the end he simply couldn't do anything but agreed with the General,

Tucker told Clark that what Clark had said was "interesting" and called it a day...which was the smartest thing he could have said based on his lack of being able to debate complex issues!

It was hillarious when Wes Clark said, "well, just read my book".....to which Tucker responded, "I'll have to now". Guess Tucker will have to read the book to find out what Clark was actually saying, cause I don't think he quite understood.......although it really wasn't that difficult.

[Sparkly]

13. What was the topic? nt

[FrenchieCat]

17. Iraq and Iran......and how we need to talk with Iran......

and we need diplomacy.......like yesterday.

Talked about Patreus being a good general. Stated that Patreus believes what he sais, but that he represents his boss, this administraiton, and so he has to say things in a way that is the least damaging to the admin....that's part of his job.

Clark said it's not about Patreus being right or wrong simply because Patreus doesn't hold the right cards, because it's not about troups and tactics, it's about the policy .

Said that any Ambar progress isn't due to any surge.....and went on to explain why Ambar might be interpreted as having made progress.....none of it based on Bush's policy in Iraq.

[Adelante]

10. He's on the Daily Show tomorrow night nt

[EV_Ares]

11. Thanks, will watch. eom.

[Sparkly]

14. Did I hear Jon Stewart say it'd be both The General and President Clinton?

Or are those two separate shows? Or did I hear it all wrong?

[Adelante]

16. Wouldn't that be something?

I dunno.