Botany
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-19-07 09:41 PM
Original message |
Help please .... anybody have the vote from Jim Webb's bill? |
|
I was wondering about Warner and George Voinovich
thanx
|
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-19-07 09:41 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I can help you--both "No". Jerks. |
Botany
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-19-07 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. I never want to hear Voinovich ..... |
|
.... talking about "support the troops" again.
|
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-19-07 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. You notice he's been real quiet about it lately. Weak little teabag. |
MiaCulpa
(741 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-19-07 09:45 PM
Response to Original message |
|
warner switched and voted against, I dunno about voinovich
|
rusty quoin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-19-07 09:53 PM
Response to Original message |
pinto
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-19-07 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. Ah. Thanks. I see they highlighted Warner's bait 'n switch, as well. |
pinto
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-19-07 09:53 PM
Response to Original message |
6. It was SA 2013, but the tally's not up at Thomas yet. |
|
Senate Amendment 2013.
iirc, Voinovich voted against it. Warner, I am sure, did as well:
Warner, after hinting his support, pulled a 180 and ended up supporting a smoke screen resolution from McCain, that was non binding. Both made gratuitous speeches about supporting the intent of Sen. Webb, then offered the resolution, which was a non-binding 'sense of the Senate' cover for their blockage of Sen. Webb's amendment. It was pretty shameless.
|
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-19-07 10:06 PM
Response to Original message |
8. and they brought back Sen. Craig for these close votes. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:08 AM
Response to Original message |