Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

***IMPORTANT UPDATE: Note from John Conyers re: White House in Contempt ****

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
SharonRB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 07:54 AM
Original message
***IMPORTANT UPDATE: Note from John Conyers re: White House in Contempt ****
White House in Contempt


Dear Sharon,


I wanted to take the opportunity to update you on the status of the contempt of Congress resolution in the House of Representatives.

As you may know, the Judiciary Committee passed a resolution before the August recess holding the White House and Harriet Miers in contempt of Congress for their failure to provide documents and appear before the committee as legally required by subpoena.

The information we have received to date from the Justice Department from our U.S. Attorneys investigation indicates the White House played a central role in the firing of the nine federal prosecutors. Yet, the White House has stonewalled and consistently refused to cooperate with inquiries into this matter.

At the heart of our investigation is the evidence uncovered suggesting that the nine U.S. Attorneys were fired for politically-motivated reasons, while others may have been retained because they were pursuing partisan investigations.


We have also discovered that job candidates' political contributions and affiliations were considered in hiring decisions for nonpartisan positions in the Department of Justice. Our job has been made more difficult by apparent misleading testimony from the Attorney General and other Department of Justice officials.


This politicization of our judicial system cannot be tolerated. Our citizens have a right to expect that federal prosecutions will be conducted in a fair and nonpartisan manner.


There are many steps we can take in this confrontation with the White House. Some are more extreme than others. What we must first do is get the facts that show who made these decisions in the White House. Only once we have this evidence can we adequately pursue justice.


What is now required is for the House to pass these contempt of Congress citations and pursue legal action against the White House and Harriet Miers for their failure to meet the requirements of the subpoenas. Hopefully this contempt of Congress resolution will soon have a vote on the floor of the House. I am not prepared to allow this administration to operate above the law.


Thank you for your continued support for a better democracy.


Your Friend,

John Conyers, Jr.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is the sentence that bothers me:
"Hopefully this contempt of Congress resolution will soon have a vote on the floor of the House."

1. Why has it not already had a vote on the floor of the house?

2. Why is Conyers "hoping" for a vote?

3. Why could Conyers not GUARANTEE a vote soon?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. going up against the WH is dangerous. He wants all his ducks lined up FIRST-that
is all I can think of that is holding him back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. He was ready to take it to the floor...
when Pelosi and Hoyer started stalling. That's why he said "hopefully."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MetalCanuck Donating Member (226 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I am afraid for him.
He might get some anthrax in the mail shortly. 
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. Here's the one that bothers me:
"I am not prepared to allow this administration to operate above the law."

Not prepared? That sounds a bit too much like "I intend to..."

I'd much rather hear:

"I WILL NOT allow..."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. "This politicization of our judicial system cannot be tolerated"
Yet he holds a calculator in one hand when it comes to impeachment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. You're so right! It is really disheartening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
6. K&R
Thanks for posting, Sharon! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonRB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Thom Hartmann just read the e-mail on his show
He got one, too. He's giving Conyers props!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WolverineDG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
7. Long distance kickedy & rec
:hi: Miss me?

dg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonRB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Yup!
Hurry back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonRB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. When are you coming home, anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
8. "Yet"? Try "therefore". nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
10. K&R.
Thanks, Sharon.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonRB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. You're welcome, Bleev!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
14. Thanks for posting -- K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
15. Oops -- double post.
Edited on Thu Sep-20-07 04:14 PM by DeepModem Mom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevCheesehead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
16. Thank God someone is still paying attention.
After Britney and OJ, I thought we re-entered the Twilight Zone. :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Janice325 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
17. Thanks!
Muchly appreciated.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonRB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. You're welcome!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greylyn58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
18. K&R for you Sharon




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC