Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sorry to say winning in 2008 will not be enough. It needs to be a healthy, decisive win otherwise

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Ninga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 10:01 AM
Original message
Sorry to say winning in 2008 will not be enough. It needs to be a healthy, decisive win otherwise
the new President will not have a mandate, unless the win is a landslide. Because a landslide will give a mandate, and a mandate will give the new President leverage with the Congress.

The new President will need leverage in order to sell progressive programs.

Without a landslide the GOP will co-op the process by saying "although so and so won, it was not a mandate so the people spoke and the country is still divided"...

A close election will give the GOP the will to fight the new President, and make it very difficult to pass new programs. If the new Presidents give this country "more of the same" and is not able to show the American people that progress has been made, it will give the GOP the talking points for the off year elections.

So you see, winning in 2008 will not be enough without a landslide victory. (Something like Reagan did in 1990).


In full disclosure, I am a John Edwards supporter.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. Winning the Presidency with a half percent will be plenty -
no mandate needed. What is needed is commanding control of the Senate and the House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. A half percent
will be a mandate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
3. Take back the senate that's the problem along with the president.
If we had enough votes in the senate and if some of the republicans had the guts to do what the American public want instead of what the monster in the white house wants, we might get something done.

The republicans think if they can make the public think the democrats are a do nothing congress they will get the seats back. And if the democrats don't start preaching this far and wide the republicans are gonna be right. We won't get the seats in the congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CitizenLeft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I totally agree
Edited on Sun Sep-23-07 11:15 AM by CitizenLeft
And since you posted it twice, I agree twice. :hi: If we win more seats in the senate, a wide margin of victory won't be necessary. I think both will happen: a comfortable victory, and more seats in both houses.

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. Take back the senate that's the problem along with the president.
If we had enough votes in the senate and if some of the republicans had the guts to do what the American public want instead of what the monster in the white house wants, we might get something done.

The republicans think if they can make the public think the democrats are a do nothing congress they will get the seats back. And if the democrats don't start preaching this far and wide the republicans are gonna be right. We won't get the seats in the congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
6. Coattails----->
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-23-07 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
7. Definitely...
Definitely, we have to put aside any current issues with dems and focus on giving them enough control to fix everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC