Media Matters: OHIO OP-ED PAGES DOMINATED BY RIGHT (Unprecedented Study)

[mod mom]

Mods-this is a press release so I am assuming the rule of 4 paragraphs does not apply. I will gladly edit this if it does.


PRESS RELEASE

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
Monday, September 24, 2007
CONTACT: Karl Frisch
202-756-4103 phone
[e-mail]

Report: Black and White and Re(a)d All Over
Ohio Op-Ed Pages
Dominated by Right
Unprecedented Study of U.S. Daily Newspapers Shows Conservatives with Distinct Advantage in Syndicated Op-Eds Nationally and in Ohio

State-Based Data Are Attached as a PDF, While the Entire Report
With National Figures and Detailed Analysis is Available Online at
www.mediamatters.org/reports/oped/

Washington, D.C. – Media Matters for America today released Ohio data for its new report “Black and White and Re(a)d All Over: The Conservative Advantage in Syndicated Op-Ed Columns,” a comprehensive and unprecedented analysis of nationally syndicated columnists from nearly 1,400 newspapers, or 96 percent of English-language U.S. daily newspapers.

Because of the time, labor, and difficulty involved in gathering such a wide scope of detailed information about America’s newspapers, no one has ever before determined exactly where syndicated columnists are published. The report shows that conservative syndicated columnists are carried in far more newspapers, with much greater audience reach than their progressive counterparts, giving them a distinct advantage in the marketplace of ideas.

Ohio: Key Findings

Conservative Syndicated Columnists Dominate Ohio Daily Newspapers Each Week -- Conservative syndicated columnists appear a total of 200 times per week in Ohio newspapers. Centrist columnists appear a total of 40 times, while progressive columnists appear a total of 95 times.

Conservative Syndicated Columnists Reach Ohio Readers Nearly 1 Million More Times Each Week Than Progressives -- Nationally syndicated conservative columnists account for 45 percent of the column impressions in Ohio each week, while nationally syndicated progressive columnists account for only 39 percent. Those conservative columnists reach Ohio readers 833,207 more times each week than their progressive counterparts.


Top Syndicated Columnists in Ohio Are Mostly Conservative Each Week -- The top nationally syndicated columnists published regularly in Ohio consist of seven conservatives, one centrist, and three progressives.

Nationwide: Key Findings

Conservative Syndicated Columnists Dominate Daily Newspapers -- Sixty percent of the nation’s newspapers print more conservative syndicated columnists every week than progressive syndicated columnists. Only 20 percent run more progressives than conservatives, while the remaining 20 percent are evenly balanced.

Conservative Syndicated Columnists Reach Millions More Than Progressives -- In a given week, nationally syndicated conservative columnists are published in more than 153 million newspapers. Progressive columnists, on the other hand, are published in 125 million newspapers.

Top Syndicated Columnists Are Mostly Conservative -- The list of the top 10 columnists, sorted by the number of papers in which they are carried or by the total circulation of the papers in which they are published, includes five conservatives, two centrists, and only three progressives.

In Region After Region, Conservative Syndicated Columnists Enjoy Advantage -- In eight of the nine regions into which the U.S. Census divides the country, conservative syndicated columnists reach more readers than progressive syndicated columnists in any given week. Only in the Middle Atlantic region (which includes New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania) do progressive columnists reach more readers each week.

“Together, these results prove what many have suspected for years -- that our opinion pages both nationally and in the Buckeye State are consistently skewed to the right, allowing conservatives a disproportionate advantage in shaping public opinion,” said David Brock, President and CEO of Media Matters. “The integrity of our nation’s newspapers is at stake when the debate of today’s pressing issues is dominated by one side of the argument,” Brock said.

What’s Being Said About This Report

“A Washington Post Writers Group executive agrees with Media Matters that conservatives do better than liberals on Op-Ed pages ...” -- Editor & Publisher, 9/17/07

“Like our count, the Media Matters study found that Will is the king of the hill with his column running at least once a month in 368 newspapers.” -- Houston Chronicle, 9/15/07

“The Media Matters report on the play of syndicated columnists in American daily newspapers confirmed what everybody in the business already knows -- that, statistically, newspapers publish more syndicated conservatives than liberals.” -- The Washington Post Writers Group, 9/14/07

“The results of the Media Matters survey on the use of political pundits is welcome news, especially as a response to those who have long claimed that there is a liberal media bias.” -- Keith Runyon in The Louisville Courier-Journal, 9/14/07

“Have you heard the one about the liberal media? It's a big fallacy, according to Media Matters for America. Or at least it is on op-ed pages. The group produced a report last week suggesting America's op-ed pages are dominated by conservative columnists. It's an interesting finding, if true.” -- The Denver Post, 9/16/07

“On Wednesday, the liberal group Media Matters for America issued a study that claims the op-ed pages of the nearly 1,430 daily English-language newspapers in the United States are dominated by conservative syndicated columnists.” -- Chicago Tribune, 9/14/07

“If you're a George Will fan, and it seems that most of us are, then this won't be a surprise. Media Matters, the progressive media watchdog, finds that he's the king of newspaper columnists.” -- U.S. News & World Report, 9/12/07

“Media Matters for America, the progressive journalistic watchdog group, is patting itself on the back today for discovering that most of the syndicated columns in the nation's newspapers skew conservative. So much for the myth of the liberal media.” -- Chicago Tribune, 9/12/07

“ found that 60 percent of the daily newspapers print more conservative syndicated columnists each week than liberals. Twenty percent of the papers are dominated by liberals and 20 percent are balanced.” -- Associated Press, 9/11/07

About the Report & Media Matters for America

Media Matters amassed information on 201 nationally syndicated columnists published by nearly every daily newspaper in the country. Contacting each paper individually to ask which syndicated columnists are published, we obtained information from 1,377 newspapers, or 96 percent of all English-language daily newspapers in the United States.

This study is unparalleled in its scope and level of detail. Despite the enormous influence of America’s op-ed pages, no one has ever before determined where syndicated columnists are specifically published. Previous examinations of syndicated columnists relied on data provided by the syndicates themselves, while Media Matters contacted each and every English-language daily newspapers to ensure the highest level of accuracy.

Media Matters is a not-for-profit, progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media.

State-Based Data Are Attached as a PDF, While the Entire Report
With National Figures and Detailed Analysis is Available Online at
www.mediamatters.org/reports/oped/

###

Media Matters for America is a not-for-profit, progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media. Media Matters for America is the first organization to systematically monitor the media for conservative misinformation every day, in real time. For more information, visit www.mediamatters.org.

[Joanne98]

1. They need a study to figure that out? I don't even buy a newpaper anymore!

It sooooo bias it's ridiculous! I really hate that besty Hart bitch! Everytime I see her picture, I want to beat her face in!

[mod mom]

2. I too gave up subscriptions after '04 endorsements were so biased despite

the evidence about bu$h. Why pay for corporate propaganda?-plus what a waste for the environment.

[JDPriestly]

3. Wake up Ohio! Ohio doesn't get Air America either.

My family lives in Ohio. They complain about the right-wing slant of their news all the time. We need to keep talking about this. The Republicans control the media there and are trying to fix the next elections through unfair manipulation of information. Ohio is a key state. The Republicans made a mess of it and are now using unfair, dishonest control of the news and opinion to take back the state. The Democratic governor, senator and leadership in that state had better wake up and confront this problem or they will be out on their heads. Wake up Ohio.

[HughBeaumont]

4. Just take a look at the Cleveland Blame Dealer!!

Former publisher - Arch-Conservative.

Current publisher - Conservative.

Reader Representative - Conservative.

Deputy Editor - Ultra-right-wing, off-the-damned-charts whackadoo.

They also have at least two to three reporters of a conservative bent (Sabrina Eaton and Stephen Koff, I'm looking at YOU TWO!).

Every story of protest against the government either doesn't get mentioned or it's on page 8.

Any story disparaging the Fuhrer - same thing.

Oh, but God FORBID a Democrat does one thing wrong in their eyes (and really, the "something wrong" is a parking ticket compared to . . . I don't know . . . killing our soldiers in a useless oil grab???) . . . front page news!

If you recall, the Blame Dealer endorsed NO one for the 2004 election. Why? The editorial board voted to endorse Kerry. Alex Machaskee, corrupt enabler to Big Business interests and friend to crooked Cleveland pols, laid down the gauntlet - "You endorse George W Bush or you endorse NO ONE!" The PD was the only major paper in the US that made the absolute gutless decision to not have a presidential endorsement. We were a laughingstock.

The PD endorsed Mike DeWine, one of the worst Bewsh sycophants in the Senate at the time, over Sherrod Brown in 2006. Why? This is patently unbelieveable: They endorsed that milquetoast rubber-stamp nerdster based on their weird logic of Sherrod Brown's pro-worker stance being "out of the playbook of the AFL-CIO and Dennis Kucinich rather than based on good economics". Right, because God forbid you should have good things happening to rank-and-file workers.

The PD HATES Kucinich. In fact, there's an anti-Kucinich article in today's paper.

http://blog.cleveland.com/openers/2007/09/washington_in_hawaii_cleveland.html

Sunday's paper is usually loaded with liberal readers' fact-armed beatdowns of said Deputy Editor's weekly columns, which are riddled with BillO-esque talking points at their worst.

And don't get me started on fucking Stephen Koff. The guy actually had the NERVE to write a pro-offshoring article for a paper that resides in a county accounted for 11% of Ohio's total job loss, many of them in manufacturing. Not surprisingly, they didn't print my LTTE, which pretty much destroyed his pro-corporate, pro-laissez-faire crapcake of a story.

Small wonder we won't be renewing after this year.