Sunday Shows Reviews Are In: Hillary 'In Terrific Form,' 'Presidential,' 'Gutsy'

[William769]

http://www.hillaryclinton.com/news/release/view/?id=3422

[jenmito]

1. I heard them described as "filibustering," "no headlines,"...

just saying what she wanted to say without answering any questions. That was from Howard Fineman and two other guests on Hardball.

[William769]

2. Now theres a winner! Howard Fineman.

:sarcasm:

[jenmito]

3. Jill Zuchman and Chris Salizza all agreed pretty much with him...

Jill said "She ate them for lunch" because she said what she wanted and kept going. She's the one who answered Matthews' question about what the headline would be-there WASN'T any.

[Carrieyazel]

4. You forgot deflecting, passionless, dismissive, dissembling

She absolutely sucked on MTP. Thankfully. I was fairly pleased that Tim Ratsert actually called her out on her deplorable crap on Iraq, her incompetence on health care reform, the 850,000, and the fact that she's polarizing as hell.

[PurityOfEssence]

5. The Dame Margot Fonteyn of politics

She's always on point, dancing around the point.

[Carrieyazel]

7. Yes, and I thought her lame display fell flat, the only thing she would admit to was:

that she made lots of mistakes on health care reform. To bad she wasn't there for the full hour. Then, she definitely would have been called out on her specific mistakes 13 years ago.

[closeupready]

6. I'm going to be the contrarian here and say I thought she did very well.

I saw her on Stephanopoulos and she addressed his questions well, and was able to navigate her way around skillfully, and I thought she did a good job.

[Carrieyazel]

8. She did worse on MTP though. Her past history on Iraq, was laid out there

and it was not a pretty sight for her. Her responses on Iraq were absolutely lame on Meet the Press.

[closeupready]

9. I didn't see her on MTP - I should search for it in the video forum, because

I'd like to see how she did.