Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton Haters Outpace Obama Backers on Facebook

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 06:24 AM
Original message
Clinton Haters Outpace Obama Backers on Facebook
Clinton Haters Outpace Obama Backers on Facebook
By Sarah Lai Stirland 09.28.07 | 12:00 AM

Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Rodham Clinton dominates the airwaves, the Sunday political talk shows and the polls. And it turns out she's also dominating one of the hottest new media platforms in politics -- but not in a way she would like.

The largest pro- or anti-candidate group on the popular social-networking site Facebook is an anti-Clinton cluster named Stop Hillary Clinton (One Million Strong AGAINST Hillary), according to Facebook statistics.

At midweek, the group boasted nearly 425,000 members. It's growing 10 percent a month, says Micah Sifry, co-founder of TechPresident, a blog that covers the interaction of presidential candidates and the web.

TechPresident has been tracking the statistics on Facebook, and it took note when the Clinton-haters outstripped another campaign group named Barack Obama (One Million Strong for Barack). That grassroots campaign had 359,000 members at midweek.

"I don't think it's surprising that there's a lot of anti-Hillary sentiment out there," Sifry says. "To some people, Hillary's a known quantity, and a hated quantity. The difference is that they're using the new tools, and what is interesting is that it has outpaced the Obama group."

Facebook had an audience of just over 26 million unique visitors in August, according to Compete.com. The dominant user demographic is between the ages of 18 and 24, according to ComScore MediaMetrix.

That demographic is certainly reflected in the members of the anti-Clinton Facebook group -- the majority of whom appear to be either in college or high school.

<SNIP>

http://www.wired.com/politics/law/news/2007/09/facebook_hillary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
T_i_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. There's always the DU Facebook group!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nam78_two Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
43. I did not know there was a DU group on facebook-I just joined
Facebook is lame, but I still have an account ;).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. So the Hillary haters were between 6 and 12 years old
Edited on Fri Sep-28-07 06:57 AM by Gman
when Bill Clinton took office. They weren't born yet or were just born when Reagan won in 1980. So they never had to live through 12 years of Reagan/Bush. They never saw how everyone was working and making money and things were so much better during the Clinton years. They were then from 12 to 18 years old when this Bush took office but they "hate Hillary".

Go figure. Youth can be a very debilitating thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Or, they see her for who SHE is; not as Bill was.
Unfortunately, too many Hillary supporters believe we can't do better than what Bill Clinton accomplished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #8
32. They will be a package, two for one
just like it was in 1992.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #32
46. Free Trade and War hawk
hey, this isn't 1992.
Lets look ahead, not behind.
Let's try something new that hasn't been done in the 20th century.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knight_of_the_star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #32
47. I don't want a new Dynasty
Especially not one that passed DOMA and NAFTA. If pulling off stuff like that are considered achievements then quite frankly I could care less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 06:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. yes, Republicans and Obama supporters. One threatened to kill her recently...
Wonder if that was a GOPer or an Obamanite?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 07:01 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Perhaps another "dirty trick" engineered by Wolfson and his band of henchmen?
Edited on Fri Sep-28-07 07:02 AM by jefferson_dem
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. ...or by a desperate Republican or Obamanite... or both?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #6
31. That comment is out of order
Please don't slam our Democratic candidates. Each one of them is a fine candidate in his/her own right and would make a fine president that we would all be proud of. The Democratic party does not have the nuts that the Republic party has.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #31
41. "Please don't slam our Democratic candidates. " Oh, boo hoo
The days of Clinton supporters on DU constantly playing defense are over. If all manner of over the top posts can be made about her by supporters of other candidates, the reverse is also now true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. Whatever. You find it acceptable to accuse Obama supporters of issuing death threats.
Top that with any other charge you've seen made here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #41
49. Even though I support Hillary, I'm taking the high road
and I don't like or want to see any comments that slam any of our candidates. Any of our candidates would make a fine president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cassandra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Since I know someone who threatened to kill Kerry...
and might not have been joking, I'd say it was the same sort of slavering wing-nut, namely a GOPer.
Try not to slander other Democrats with accusations of attempted assasination; it's in really bad taste.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. LOL! Slander? You must be joking
It sounds just like what a wingnut would do... either from the left or the right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. LOL! Leave it to a Clinton supporter to triangulate...even a death threat.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Leave it a "progressive" Obamanite to not know the definition of "triangulate."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Parsing words as a defense? Depends on what the definition of "triangluate" is..., eh.
Typical Clintonian deflection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. No parsing. Words have definitions. And a defense of what?
The Facebook group is made up of those who hate Hillary Clinton. That would include GOPers and Obamanites of the DU strain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #14
23. My post was in reference to your suggestion that the death threat was either from
Edited on Fri Sep-28-07 07:50 AM by jefferson_dem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. which is a misuse of the word "triangulation."
And yes, I stand by the charge the death threat was either from a Republican or an Obama supporter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ethelk2044 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #23
39. It is sad when they have to stoop that low. It makes you realize her supporters
know she does not have a chance in hell of winning the GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cassandra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #7
17. Your words
"One threatened to kill her recently...

Wonder if that was a GOPer or an Obamanite?"

Who asked you to bring Obama or any of his supporters into this? Your willingness to say anything in support of Hillary tars her a bit with your creepiness. I don't know whether she knows anything about what you post online but your style has a true believer type of devotion in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. "Who asked you to bring Obama or any of his supporters into this?"
This is a discussion forum. The story was reported by an Obamanite. I can bring anything into it I want. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. I posted a link to Wired. You introduced the death threat and suggested it was an Obama supporter.
Personally, I'm fascinated by social networking and politics. What's your excuse?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. So? Do you set the agenda for a discussion? That facebook group is famous for that threat.
And you just LOVE that is has grown so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. I posted the discussion topic. The group has grown.
That's the reality but it doesn't make me feel happy. Concern, yes...for this election and the future of our party and nation.

I wish Obama's Facebook page was still #1.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bread_and_roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. You think it likely that an "Obamanite" would threaten to kill Hillary?
On what grounds is an "Obamanite" more likely than a person fitting some other categorization? And is any candidate free from or responsible for some disturbed person who happens to latch on to their campaign as part of a distorted, mentally ill world-view? So if it were an "Obamanite" what possible relationship would that have to Obama or his campaign? I don't happen to be an "Obamanite" but I cannot see any hate-mongering or incitement to violence in his campaign - can you?

And what possible motive could you have in posing such a question?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
13. The good news is the demographic of this group
Is the least likely to vote. AT least this group doesn't lie about hating Clinton, like some people I could mention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. The bad news is this group is the *NEW* generation of voters...
who will be around for the next half century.

Wouldn't it be nice to socialize them into the Democratic camp for as long as they are...around? But, hey, you're all about "win"-at-all-costs-now, I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. "But, hey, you're all about "win"-at-all-costs-now"
And your not? :rofl:

And you say that with what you just posted in the original OP. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #16
34. But the good news is also that this *NEW* generation will also grow up
and become more conservative (yes, conservative) just as those before them have. Hopefully, this generation won't get as bad as Allen Dershowitz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
15. a Facebook group created by a Young Republican who heads the NH office reported by an Obamanite
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cassandra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. Obamanite sounds like...
some mineral discovered on Star Trek.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Obamanites... part of the Obama nation... or abomination?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cassandra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. You're so clever....
not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #22
28. thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #22
50. He thinks he's very clever.
There's a better word than clever to describe it, but rules are rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #21
33. Why do you hate us, wyld?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #33
37. Better question is why do you hate us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #15
26. The story is in Wired mag. Are all 450,000 members "Young Republicans"?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #26
30. I would hope so.
I would not like to think of a Democrat belonging to a hate group.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ethelk2044 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #30
38. It is not a hate group if they do not want Hillary Elected
Edited on Fri Sep-28-07 10:31 AM by Ethelk2044
Is is just like Hillaryis44 group
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #38
45. Thats not a group, thats a web site.
Maybe you should look up the definition of a hate group, it may be broad, but this group fits the criteria.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #45
53. I thought Hillary was appealing to "invisible people"...
Those look fairly three-dimensional to me. Holograms perhaps?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #53
54. How many people belong to that website?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #26
35. I think a lot of them are uninformed as well
For example, I have a somewhat apolitical friend who said that she wouldn't stop and talk to her tour group when they were visiting the capitol but that John McCain was very nice and spoke with them for 10 minutes.

Combine that with the already negative image of Hillary and you have the same effect as people who don't like John Edwards because of his $400 haircut except multiply that by about 50 to 100.

I'm not voting for Hillary but I'll be the first to admit that the reasons that many people have for disliking her are complete bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T_i_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #15
42. Rather then just smearing everyone else...
How about promoting PRO-Hilary Facebook groups instead?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
36. There's a difference between the two?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #36
40. not too much of a difference
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
48. I don't hate Hillary. Far from it. But here's why she can't win
I've said this over and over. I , and millions of my fellow Obamaramas on this campaign, do not hate Hillary. Never have, Never will. I respect her service, I loved the terms her husband served in office.

BUT her organization and advisory staff is composed of every insulated beltway pundit who ran and lost the past two presidential campaigns.This is the bunch who advised Gore to drop his court case, and Kerry not to press fraud charges in Ohio. Those same Dems fought Howard Dean tooth and nail. First, they squashed hsi campaign, and that's fine. It's politics. Then they battled and lobbied and did everything they could to fight the 50 state strategy. They have a skewed view which says we have to water down our beliefes, that the Democratic party "base" is too leftwing", the blogosphere is ill-informed and reactionary, and that we can't win by standing up for what we are and differentiating ourselves to the electorate. Despite the obvious success of exactly that in 2006.

IF Hillary gets the nomination, this bunch will assure that what should be a walkaway ends up being a "razor thin loss" where "America just isn't ready for a woman president".


It will all be bullshit, and it's entirely preventable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #48
52. uh... what?
her organization and advisory staff is composed of every insulated beltway pundit who ran and lost the past two presidential campaigns.

Like who?

Those same Dems fought Howard Dean tooth and nail. First, they squashed hsi campaign, and that's fine. It's politics. Then they battled and lobbied and did everything they could to fight the 50 state strategy.

Who and in what way?

Your entire post amounts to little more than progressive folklore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
51. Don't worry...they hate all Dems and will go after any of them.
They don't really hate Hillary more than any other.None of these people will even vote in '08.

Yeah...that's the ticket!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC