specimenfred1984
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 10:02 AM
Original message |
When the No. 1 thread is about impeaching the (D) House Speaker... |
|
this website clearly isn't supporting the democratic party anymore.
|
nancyr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 10:04 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Perhaps it's the other way around? |
NaturalHigh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
Anyone, Democrat or Republican, who supports the continuation of the war in Iraq, does not have my support.
|
Lost4words
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. we support democrats not DINOs, who turn their head at political crimes |
Kelly Rupert
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
11. So...who is a real Democrat, then? |
|
Edited on Fri Sep-28-07 10:36 AM by Kelly Rupert
I think by the time you're calling the majority of Democrats "DINOs," it's your definition of Democrat that's incorrect, not theirs.
|
jmp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
14. I don't see anyone ... |
|
Calling the "majority" of Democrats DINOs. Or did you mean the majority of congressional Democrats?
|
Kelly Rupert
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
15. I would mean the majority of elected Democrats, |
|
and perhaps the majority of the electorate, which keeps happily voting them in and saying they approve of their performance*.
*individual performance, not the performance of Congress as a whole.
|
Lost4words
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
17. you must be correct. Which is also very sad, dont you think? |
jmp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
Totally Committed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 10:05 AM
Response to Original message |
2. No offense, but what a crock of happy horse-hockey! |
|
When the No. 1 thread is about impeaching the (D) House Speaker... it's clear the Party isn't representing Democrats anymore.
TC
|
derby378
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. Damn right - we expected results, and we aren't getting any |
|
Rove and Gonzales were allowed to leave under their own power. We're getting closer to invading Iran. Domestic surveillance is still on the rise. Torture is still legal. And me, I'm getting rather frustrated.
|
ramapo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. True but not an impeachable offense |
|
The Democratic leadership has proven to be spineless, paper tigers. The party is a joke. They've made life easy for the Republican minority, engaging in ridiculous nonsense like the Move-On resolution and rolling over for filibuster threats.
Lack of backbone is not impeachable. Unfortunately the result is going to be a disgusted, uninspired electorate who just might not be too inclined to vote Democratic in '08.
|
Moochy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 10:33 AM
Response to Original message |
8. Granite Futures are looking up! |
ShortnFiery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 10:33 AM
Response to Original message |
9. Oh Pooh Pooh, it also has 75 nominations. |
Moochy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. It R the BEST WAY to run R govrnMint |
|
Edited on Fri Sep-28-07 10:38 AM by Moochy
more than 75 votes?? we got more than 60!! lets impeach!
|
SixString
(206 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 10:40 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Free thinkers usually question the motives and actions of leaders and authority figures. It's better than blindly following them down whatever path they choose to lead you.
|
jmp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
Just say Baaaahhhh!!!! ;)
|
HughBeaumont
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 10:56 AM
Response to Original message |
16. I don't know. Maybe I'd support her if she, say . . . |
|
. . . DIDN'T give the Failure Fuhrer blank checks on continual war funding, like a rubberstamp Republican congress did.
We're catering to fascists. There ain't no other way of spinning this. There is no mission. There is no "win". This is a completely useless waste of soldiers lives and our tax dollars.
|
CK_John
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 01:16 PM
Response to Original message |
18. Total ignorance of the constitution and our government structure. n/t |
Vidar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 02:23 PM
Response to Original message |
19. Au contraire. Nancy Pelosi isn't supporting the democratic party anymore. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:43 AM
Response to Original message |