Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton: $5,000 for Every U.S. Baby

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 01:16 PM
Original message
Clinton: $5,000 for Every U.S. Baby
WASHINGTON (AP) - Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton said Friday that every child born in the United States should get a $5,000 "baby bond" from the government to help pay for future costs of college or buying a home.
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8RUJEL00&show_article=1

"I like the idea of giving every baby born in America a $5,000 account that will grow over time, so that when that young person turns 18 if they have finished high school they will be able to access it to go to college or maybe they will be able to make that downpayment on their first home," she said.


Clinton said such an account program would help Americans get back to the tradition of savings that she remembers as a child, and has become harder to accomplish in the face of rising college and housing costs. She argued that wealthy people "get to have all kinds of tax incentives to save, but most people can't afford to do that."


"I think it's a wonderful idea," said Rep. Stephanie Stubbs Jones, an Ohio Democrat who attended the event(Congressional Black Caucus) and has already endorsed Clinton. "Every child born in the United States today owes $27,000 on the national debt, why not let them come get $5,000 to grow until their 18?"

Go Hillary!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fedupfisherman Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. What about the children of illegals born here?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. They are US citizens. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Good Point...
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. You mean "citizens?"
Edited on Fri Sep-28-07 01:18 PM by bunkerbuster1
Guess they'd get it too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Under current law, aren't they citizens?
Unless and until that changes, they would be included.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Wouldn't You Have To Amend The Constitution To Accomplish That?
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Interesting question. Found this...
http://www.postchronicle.com/commentary/printer_212104118.shtml

A common misconception is that the Constitution through the Fourteenth Amendment confers citizenship upon everyone born in the United States, whether or not they were born to an illegal alien.

Actually, the Constitution itself does not provide citizenship to those born of illegal parents; the Supreme Court only said it did in an 1898 decision known as 'U.S. v. Wong Ark Can', and it is politically correct to accept this Supreme Court decision while ignoring others.

The problem is that the court majority in the Wong Ark Can case, as is so often today, 'made law' according to their personal beliefs and not what those that wrote the Constitution (or in this case, the 14th Amendment) actually intended at the time it was written. Justice Horace Gray, who wrote the majority decision in the Wong Ark Can case, reveals exactly what the majority was up to by avoiding discussion about the intention of the clause by the two Senators whom are most responsible for the language of the Fourteenth Amendment, Senators Jacob M. Howard and Lyman Trumbull.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. Oh there she goes again pandering to the baby lobby!
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. I don't know, Bill promised me 15 years ago he'd help my kids
Edited on Fri Sep-28-07 01:35 PM by hedgehog
pay their way through college helping the county. I hate to tell you how much I've had to take out in student loans. Thank heavens and the voters of New York State we have a good public university system here!



BTW - that child tax credit was a bit less than promised, too. Some years, taking the child tax credit flipped me into the alternative minimum tax bracket, so it was a wash!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Think how the 50% feel
who make less than median income. Grants barely pay tuition and books, so low income parents end up with the same amount of student loans you've got. No, that college tax credit didn't do anybody much good. We need HUGE change in this country and I don't really know that any candidate, other than Kucinich, is really taking on the challenges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. OMG - yes - I think of that every time I pay my bills.
I can't figure out how anybody is getting by these days!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. And, she's going to pay for this how?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. By Restoring Progressivity To The Tax Code
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
10. I think all parents who don't have any children should get 5000.oo to put towards
solar energy and environmental protection, since they will be doing a good thing for the planet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
11. Great when Edwards had it too
I prefer real universal health coverage and education for all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
againes654 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Me too
this seems to be another spin case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
12. or even better, those who choode to adopt instead of getting pregnant should get
free college tuition for those children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. I Suspect The Child Would Come With The Dowery...
Think about it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. My point is that having more children is not a good thing for the planet. Adopting one, however,
is. I was being sarcastic saying I oppose this idea of "paying people to have babies".I can't think of a worse idea, really. Sort of like paying people with tax deductions to drive hummers. just a bad idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. If The Child Was Born After The Law Was Signed He Has That $5,000.00 Bond Whether He's Adopted Or
Not, Presumably...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
16. I can't get the link to work
She said "I will do this as President" or "I like the idea"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fedupfisherman Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
20. What about inflation?
Edited on Fri Sep-28-07 01:42 PM by fedupfisherman
What will 5 thousand really buy down the road??

Why not 15 thousand per child?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. It's A Bond So It Will Collect Interest.
And , respectfully, your argument about making it $15,000.00 is what some right wingers do when you say you want to raise the minimum wage... They will say why don't you raise it to $50.00 an hour...

It will help...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fedupfisherman Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Does this also apply to rich kids?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. I Guess It Would Apply To Everrybody,My Friend..
But then again, the same problem , arises as in the minimum wage debate... If you advocate "free" medicine some wingnut will come along and say "you really want to give Bill Gates free medicine"....

Who cares if a few rich folks get a break ($,5000.00 to Bill Gates is probably like a dollar to you or I) as long as poor, working class, and middle income folks get a break?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fedupfisherman Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. No breaks for rich kids
Sorry.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. Define Rich...
Edited on Fri Sep-28-07 05:58 PM by DemocratSinceBirth
A family that makes $50,00.00 with one kid doesn't have as much disaposable income as the same family with five kids...

I'm curious what your formula will be...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democratsin08 Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
25. she isnt always right
idiot idea. why cant i get 5k from someone else? i need it more that some infant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
26. She totally stole that from Biden - escept he said $500
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
27. 18 Years into the future....
TOYOTA'S new 15K sports model becomes the biggest selling car in history as 2 million children all receive the results of their 5K investment from Clinton and spend it buying a car instead of on college.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
28. How do you police the money?
Who enforces that it will be used for education or buying a home (something many people can't afford to do until their 30's now)? And who manages the account? Parents (like they'll keep their hands off it) or the government (a new bureaucracy or a private firm?).

You hand Americans money and they want to spend it. This strikes me as an administrative nightmare and nothing more than a gimmicky variation on the privatization theme. Stop complaining about the soaring cost of education...what do you think those baby bonds were for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
31. those parents with 17 kids are sitting on a windfall
17 x $5,000 = $85,000

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democratsin08 Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
32. lets give everyone 1 million bucks!!
ill be first in line!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
33. Hilary Rosen, Hillary supporter, just said on MSNBC that was "not an official proposal."
Edited on Fri Sep-28-07 05:34 PM by flpoljunkie
(It is, however, a major pander to the Congressional Black Caucus Conference.)

Then, after Tucker showed the clip of Hillary today saying this, Hilary Rosen said "that's going to be hard to back away from."

(And people say that Bill and Hil will say anything to get elected...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC