Ninga
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 03:23 PM
Original message |
Hillary should be where she is in the polls because she is at the top of the |
|
list in name recognition.
She has had 15 years of media exposure.
15 years of free media 15 years of being known every where in the world, by her first name 15 years of being the topic of discussion at every GOP ward meeting 15 years of crafting her message, and being in the right place at the right time
Yet, Edwards and Obama have been able to keep it close, and in some polls, within striking distance.
It is my opinion that she has peeked and she may yet get toppled.
|
antigop
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 03:25 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Marketing 101: "we often know brands simply because advertisers want us to." |
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
antigop
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
20. There's a reason Time Magazine referred to the Clinton "brand" n/t |
|
Edited on Fri Sep-28-07 03:57 PM by antigop
|
rinsd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
12. With Obama as New Coke! |
SaveElmer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 03:26 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Fri Sep-28-07 03:27 PM by SaveElmer
How she has gone up in the polls as her opponents have increased their name recognition...
If what you say is true her lead should be shrinking
|
Ninga
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
14. That is your conclusion not mine. My point is that 15 years is a mighty long time |
|
for the world to be on a first name basis with the woman.
Just because people know her, who she is, and what her name is DOES NOT MEAN THEY WILL VOTE FOR HER.
Her name recognition is the biggest and best thing she has going for her.
The next debate will be important, because viewers will be watching to see if she is able to counter punch.
But Edwards is smart, is pacing himself, and displayed strength without being condescending. Second place or even third place in this horse race positions him to win by a nose.
|
rfranklin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
16. She also has very high negatives...people hate her viscerally... |
|
not because they have any good reason to do so. Yet, they still hate her. My business partner is a perfect example of that. Doesn't know why, but she hates Hillary.
|
Ninga
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
19. I cringe at the word "hate". I dearly wanted to support her, but dislike her |
|
approach and thinking so much, that I shy away from supporting her.
It is NOT enough that she is a woman, and smart.....it goes deeper than that, and I can not 'splain myself.
Additionally, she is way too hawkish in my view, and I would say that although she is experienced, she does not illuminate in the way a natural leader does.
|
juajen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
31. I have it on good authority that she is hated by some because |
|
she forgave Bill. It would have been better if he had had regular sex with Monica; because, as you know, pugs don't do oral sex. Do you really want to side with people who have never had great sex? I was told this by my very upright and uptight repuglican sister, who I still love very much. She had not one legitimate reason for hating Hillary. Fortunately, she would have never voted for a democrat anyway; so, her vote is not a loss to the us.
|
daninthemoon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 03:28 PM
Response to Original message |
3. No matter the polls, no matter how sure the pundits, we are still |
|
MONTHS away from a single vote being cast. The twists and turns haven't even started yet. Remeber Howard Dean?
|
Old and In the Way
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 03:29 PM
Response to Original message |
4. You make a good case to vote for Hillary. |
|
In spite of 15 years of Republican hatred and attacks, she's still #1 in the polls. A mere mortal would have crumbled under that focus.
|
MessiahRp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
8. Yes because she's immortal |
ShortnFiery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
9. Yeah someone who's capable of owning a conscious - HRC and * have that in common. |
ShortnFiery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 03:30 PM
Response to Original message |
5. If the whores in the corporate media drool over HRC any more, we may not get to vote. |
|
Both the M$M as well as the lion's share of the political ruling class have already anointed HRC. :thumbsdown:
|
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
10. We'll bring them to their knees. We can do it. nt |
ShortnFiery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
15. Yes, I hear you! God willing and Diebold not pre-programmed. |
|
The more they laud HRC, the more willing I am to shag my butt to the polls and VOTE. :hi:
I would love to see some of those disgustingly self-satiated democratic strategists' faces when *their candidate* doesn't win as THEY ORDERED US LITTLE PEOPLE TO DO.
That would be sweet! :-)
|
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
27. If you're so inclined, don't forget to shag your butt to the Primary, too. nt |
rinsd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 03:30 PM
Response to Original message |
6. That would make sense except Obama & Edwards name recognition have gone up |
|
And yet the polls have not changed.
|
movonne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
13. Wow that's a lot of logic.... |
rinsd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
22. If Clinton's lead is pure name recognition, then when her opponents NR rises, the lead should shrink |
|
It has not. Instead she has a larger lead now then when she was dominating Edwards and Obama in name recognition.
|
Ethelk2044
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 03:32 PM
Response to Original message |
11. You are not the first person who has said this and will not be the last. I agree with you |
William769
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 03:38 PM
Response to Original message |
17. How many polls are they keeping it close in? |
|
Who has run On a Presidential ticket so far?
Who has been the media darling for the past couple of years before he decised to run for President?
|
Kelly Rupert
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 03:39 PM
Response to Original message |
18. Closest poll I've seen in the last month was 14 points. What are you looking at? |
rinsd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
23. I think that reference is to state polls vs national heats (nt) |
MethuenProgressive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 04:07 PM
Response to Original message |
21. "15 years of free media" 15 years of anti-Clinton propaganda - for free! |
|
another HateHill flamebait thread, nothing more...
|
Ninga
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
26. I do not hate Hillery, I do not favor her. And any media, negative or otherwise, |
|
advances name recognition far and beyond any other method in existence.
Ask any person in the world who Hillary Clinton is, and I would guess in those countries that have mass media, she is known.
By that measure, she should be ahead in the polls.
|
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
28. Ahhh. I get it. Good point. If I'm asked which laundry detergent I prefer, Tide or |
|
DewDrop, I'm going to say Tide because I've heard of it. So my response goes into the "prefers Tide" column. Excellent point!
If I'm not following the candidates but have heard the hoopla surrounding Clinton, Edwards and Obama, I may say "Clinton" because I've heard/read that she's a lock.
Thank you for clarifying it for me.
|
Ninga
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
34. I am glad you got my point. Now take your mic out onto the street and play like you |
|
are Jay Leno.........and ask lots of smart questions. Do this several million times, and then report back your findings.
|
FlaxieB
(359 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 04:10 PM
Response to Original message |
24. That's the only reason she there. Also married to Bill. |
|
She married into this position of privilege. No marriage to the ex-Prez, 3d tier candidate. period.
|
juajen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
32. By that reasoning, can we expect pickles to run for pres and win, BIG? |
feminazi
(911 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-29-07 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #24 |
36. Oh for Christ's Sake, FlaxieB |
|
You make it sound like Hillary pounced on Bill and forced him to marry her once he became President. They've been married for 30 years and thru the political wars together since Arkansas in the late 70's. Just like Elizabeth Edwards is an asset for John, Hillary was an asset for Bill. She didn't MARRY into a postion of privilege.....they built it together.
And just to set the record straight, Senator Clinton is not my first choice. That would be Edwards since Clark is out and Gore doesn't appear to be running.
|
durrrty libby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 04:14 PM
Response to Original message |
25. A whole lot of wishful thinking going on but absolutely no logic |
Dr Fate
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
29. You will see a lot more wishful thinking if she gets nominated. |
|
All this "America really does love Hillary" crap will be seen for the myth it is.
We will see a lot of "centrists" blaming the left instead of themselves once the Republican wins in 2008 if she does get the nom.
|
durrrty libby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-29-07 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #29 |
juajen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 06:13 PM
Response to Original message |
30. Get real! John Edwards has just as much name recognition as |
|
Hillary. He has been a senator and a vice presidential candidate. Additionally, an appearance on Oprah Winfrey and a gala fundraiser has vaulted Obama's name recognition as high as Hillary's. She just happens to be more popular than either. Not her fault
|
spooky3
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #30 |
33. not true, according to Gallup -- she has 17 %-age points on him |
Carrieyazel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-29-07 01:34 AM
Response to Original message |
35. With all this in her favor, the fact that she isn't anywhere near 50% is telling. |
|
Hillaryland thought they'd be at 55% right now and it isn't happening. She's down around 38%, which shows her weaknessess. She could get toppled of course.
|
fightindonkey
(674 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-29-07 03:30 AM
Response to Original message |
37. Keep Dreaming She'll Get Toopled, Even When She Is The Next President |
|
She is leading by double digits.
She wins because people want experience. They want someone they know.
|
Silence Dogood
(215 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-29-07 04:52 AM
Response to Original message |
38. I called the Obama campaign for a refund |
|
The guy has a messiah complex. Cramming religion down everyone throat. Government in bed with religion. All I want is my money back and Obama stopping the lying BS he peddles to the mesmerized masses.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:41 AM
Response to Original message |