SaveElmer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 04:34 PM
Original message |
Rasmussen: Updated favorability ratings |
|
In order by net favorability...
Top three Democrats are the most popular...
Candidate favorable/unfavorable (NET)
John Edwards: 51%/41% (NET 10%) Barack Obama: 51%/43% (NET 8%) Hillary Clinton: 52%/46% (NET 6%) Fred Thompson: 43%/37% (NET 6%) Rudy Giuliani: 49%/45% (NET 4%) Mike Huckabee: 30%/28% (NET 2%) Bill Richardson: 32%/32% (NET 0%) John McCain: 40%/43% (NET -3%) Mitt Romney: 40%/44% (NET -4%) Duncan Hunter: 18%/24% (NET -6%) Joe Biden: 31%/40% (NET -9%) Chris Dodd: 26%/35% (NET -9%) Dennis Kucinich: 27%/37% (NET -10%) Ron Paul: 23%/34% (NET -11%) Sam Brownback: 21%/36% (NET -15%) Tom Tancredo: 16%/33% (NET -17%) Mike Gravel: 13%/30% (NET -17%)
|
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 04:37 PM
Response to Original message |
1. ummm...Edwards gains 10pts and Dennis K. LOSES 10 pts. |
rinsd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. I think you misunderstood. Those are net approvals (approval - disapproval). |
jcrew2001
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
15. Proves once again Edwards is the only Guaranteed winner |
|
in the general election. But polls are meaningless eh? Edwards can't win that easily can he?
I mean we have to make this election as close as possible, for the sake of MSM ratings.
|
rinsd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 04:38 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Rudy used to be in the 60's! The more people see him, the less they like him! |
youthere
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
10. I think the pukes are finally getting that St. Rudy only has 911 to offer. |
WI_DEM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 04:38 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Gouliani's favorable ratings have fallen |
|
The top Gop candidates--Rudy, McCain, and Mittens now have unfavorable ratings about the same as Hillary and Hillary has a higher favorable rating than any of them.
|
William769
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 04:42 PM
Response to Original message |
5. EHS right around th e corner. |
|
Thanks for the update SaveElmer.
|
movonne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 04:48 PM
Response to Original message |
6. where is the link to this... |
rinsd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
movonne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
knight_of_the_star
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 04:56 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Good to know our top three are THE top three |
|
Bodes well for the election, although I don't really like HRC's high unfavorable though. That won't lend to an easy win and if nothing else lead to a squeaker.
|
Alamom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 05:17 PM
Response to Original message |
jcrew2001
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 06:47 PM
Response to Original message |
12. 46% unfavorable for Hillary - thats not something she should be proud of |
|
Edited on Fri Sep-28-07 06:47 PM by jcrew2001
this poll only proves that the real Sure Thing in the general election will be John Edwards.
But thats just me, I don't want to lose an election.
|
wyldwolf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. Within the MOE of Obama... |
jcrew2001
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
14. on the plus side, can she actually get MORE people to hate her than |
|
they do already? I think she needs to go for at least 50% - Kerry at least managed that.
And we wonder why we lose every 4 years, because we nominate unlikable northeast liberals. The MSM eastern establishment like them, but the rest of country hates their guts.
|
wyldwolf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-29-07 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
19. her positives are rising, Obama's are falling. |
|
Edited on Sat Sep-29-07 07:32 AM by wyldwolf
:)
And we wonder why we lose every 4 years, because we nominate unlikable northeast liberals.
Always funny seeing a netrooter show his/her ignorance. Not surprising, just funny.
|
creeksneakers2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
18. Its something to be proud of |
|
if her improvement is considered. Hillary was at 54% negative not long ago.
|
Jim Lane
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-29-07 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
21. You can't read too much into an early poll with small differences |
|
The "unfavorables" are: Edward 41%, Clinton 46%. That's not a huge difference. Nor is the difference in net responses (Edwards +10%, Clinton +6%).
I personally prefer Edwards to Clinton, but let's be realistic -- this poll doesn't establish Edwards as a Sure Thing or Clinton as a sure loser. (Unfortunately, this far in advance of the election, it doesn't event establish any of the leading Republicans as sure losers. The best we can say is that it's moderately encouraging.)
|
calteacherguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 07:56 PM
Response to Original message |
16. Senator Clinton is our most popular candidate! She's a winner! nt |
|
Edited on Fri Sep-28-07 07:56 PM by calteacherguy
|
jcrew2001
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-30-07 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
22. But do you think that John Edwards leads all GOP by a wider margin? |
illinoisprogressive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-28-07 08:06 PM
Response to Original message |
17. Rassmussen is being written by Doug Schoen, Penn's partner and know clintonista. |
|
check with glenn greenwald's column yesterday writing about this and rass. is not totally neutral.
|
Maribelle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-29-07 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #17 |
20. And do you think hitting anyone up as a known clintonista today is supposed to be an insult? |
|
The state of affairs created by the corrupt Bush/Cheney thugs makes the Clinton administration look like archangels of the highest rank.
Brand them anything you want.
The worm has turned.
|
rinsd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-30-07 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
24. Greenwald did not dispute Rasmussen's numbers only Shoen's analysis. |
|
What a shock that you would misrepresent something.
|
jcrew2001
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-30-07 01:37 PM
Response to Original message |
23. This poll makes John Edwards look great |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:32 PM
Response to Original message |