WASHINGTON, Sept. 28 — A day after John Edwards said he had decided to participate in public campaign financing as a matter of principle, his campaign manager appeared to scale back the candidate’s initial commitment.
The campaign manager said Mr. Edwards was leaving open the possibility of rejecting public financing for the general election campaign.
Mr. Edwards’s campaign advisers said he had not meant to commit himself for the general election, but the discrepancy added fuel to a debate over why he had abruptly embraced public financing after long signaling that he would not.
-snip
In an interview Friday, Joe Trippi, a senior Edwards campaign adviser, said Mr. Edwards had meant to say that he was committed only to a proposal that his rival, Senator Barack Obama, had extended to the Republicans. If the Republican nominee agrees to accept public campaign financing and its limits, Mr. Obama and now Mr. Edwards have said they would do the same.
“He was thinking of the Obama challenge to the Republican nominee,” Mr. Trippi said, adding that Mr. Edwards would “entertain” relying on public financing even if the Republican does not. It was unclear why Mr. Edwards had not merely extended the same challenge to his better-financed Democratic primary rivals, Mr. Obama and Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton. Both have trounced Mr. Edwards in fund-raising, each ending the second quarter with more than twice his $13 million in the bank.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/29/us/politics/29edwards.html?_r=1&ref=us&oref=slogin