Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bill Clinton would be wise to stay out of this presidential race

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BluegrassDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 12:41 AM
Original message
Bill Clinton would be wise to stay out of this presidential race
His recent remarks about Obama show that the Hillary camp is getting nervous, so they're trying to sneak Bill Clinton in there with a few jabs. The problem is that if Bill starts interjecting in this campaign (which he's free to do), then the Hillary camp shouldn't get mad if the Dems start bringing up all the negative shit that happened in the 90's, like NAFTA, outsourcing, China, Monica, impeachment, Monica, billing scandals, Monica, fundraising scandals, etc., etc.

If Bill wants to play hardball with the other candidates, then everything is fair game in my opinion. Although most Dems think fondly of the good economy under him, there's a lot of bad shit that happened under him as well. We'll see if he continues with more little jabs at Obama et al.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. Isn't it time to MoveOn from personal attacks?
That stuff is old news, can't we campaign based on hope?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TSIAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Where are the personal attacks?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. campaign based on hope? we're 9 stages into fascism. And there are only 10.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 02:20 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. You're serious, aren't you?
What is the last step to complete the takeover?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. yes. Here is a link to a du thread describing naomi wolf's book, on the ten steps to fascism:
There are many other books and essays before this one which say the exact same thing. Basiciaslly all the people who study fascism come to this same conclusion about what the ten steps are.



onehttp://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=3540772
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
24. IMO, Clintons deserve return only on the treatment they have given other Democrats
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. Big Dawg is frantically working the phones for endorsements...

And no one is better at persuasion than he is.

But it does make you wonder which one -- Bill or Hill-- really wants it more?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TSIAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Like with John Lewis of GA
He was ready to support Obama, save for a last minute save by the former Pres.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Just like Elizabeth and Michelle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 03:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. "Frantically"?
You're there? You see the flop sweat beading on his brow? You KNOW he's "frantic"?

How about "diligently"? "Eagerly"? "Helpfully"? "Encouragingly"? "Determinedly"?

The kind of slanted writing you posted with your "frantically" is pure tabloid slime. It could be a sentence in the New York Times. Absolutely shameful to see it at DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
5. Bill & Hil together can't beat Obama
He is leading among caucus goers in Iowa, and leading among the #2's. Even after Bill has stumped endlessly. As soon as people realize that Obama has already beaten the Clinton Machine, they'll know he's the "electable" one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Obama alone attracts 10 times the people that the Bill and Hill show have
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 03:45 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. Then Obama will win and you will be happy.
I favor waiting for the Democratic voters to give their opinion by ballot, myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 03:52 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. You suggest everybody just shut up
until the voters speak?

Why shouldn't I be happy if my preferred candidate wins?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
6. You should see the remarks by people on other blogs about Clinton going after Obama
not just left blogs but, the mainstream news blogs. 95% are dumping on clinton. saying things like since hillary has less experience than Obama, maybe Bill is saying she is not ready either.
or they just go after Bill about everything. and these are democrats. alot also are remarking on him overstaying his time on the stage. that it's time to leave and move on. it ain't the 90s anymore.
alot of backlash
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 03:47 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. I'm glad you can see their party registration.
How do you find it with all the assumed names online?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
10. I want to like Bill...
Edited on Sun Sep-30-07 02:19 AM by fujiyama
and I think he was a good president....

But...he signed some REALLY bad pieces of legislation as president.

I get the impression Obama has the seriousness Bill lacked.

And I think that really frustrates Clinton. Maybe he sees what could have been...were it now for the problems during his administration, some of his own doing.

Also, Clinton REALLY better not make an argument about inexperience, because many view the first two years of his first term to be a complete fucking mess. This was the time of Hillarycare and a complete inability to get anything through despite having both houses controlled by Democrats. Whatever "experience" Clinton had beforehand is irrelevant in retrospect because it took Clinton a while to accomplish anything of real value, and that too many of those "accomplishments" he touts now were bad compromises AFTER Gingrich took over the House...

Bill Clinton is NOT eligible to run again and he better not act like he is. Yes, he loves politics and campaigning but I agree that he better walk a fine line between campaigning for his wife - and campaigning for himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 03:48 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. Bill Clinton was not serious?
That's not just a lie. It's a stupid lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 05:53 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. I couldn't believe that one either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windbreeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 04:16 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. because he IS after all...NOT going to be president...
which really should be obvious....however....we must remember, that there are those out there who voted for Bill based on his looks only....so don't think for one minute that bill/hill don't intend to use those same people again to their advantage...there will be the ones who think that IF they put Hill in the WH...that it IS BILL they re-elected...some can't separate the two...some even fool themselves into believing that they do have them separated...but...are still hoping that IF they elect her, he WILL influence her in some way...I think he will NOT...

I remember, that when the Clintons chose to move to NY...AFTER he was no longer pres...that there were people who said...their move to NY was with the plan to go after the WH again...with her as president instead of him...I thought it was nuts...that nothing could be further from the truth..well, we see now, that "they" were not nuts after all..that her running for pres., HAS been plotted and planned all along...and that their move to NY and her election to the Senate WAS exactly the start of HER run...kinda cold/calculating in my book...didn't the people of NY deserve honesty on that score??

Do we NOT think she influenced Bill at all while he was in the WH? IMO...she is the pants in that family...I don't care how intelligent he might be...she's the one who runs things, and any choices she's made in the past, regarding Bill or anything else, have been made while considering from all angles, how it would benefit HER future run for the WH...even in Kosovo, she was there making sure she was seen, right alongside him...every move she's made, has been done with a run for the WH in mind...

I think a man strays, to prove that there are things that can't be controlled by anyone but them....I remember all the speculation about what she would do after his indiscretion, and why she stayed with him...being a divorced woman, I should think, would seriously inhibit your chances of a run for the WH, no matter who you are...I think people really do NOT know Hillary...I think "people" (including myself, up to now)have a tendency to seriously underestimate her...

Just recently she made the comment that she has been dreaming about being president all her life, which kind of proves the point I've been trying to make.....so IS that single minded determination a good thing, or a bad thing...guess that remains to be seen...and from what position you are seeing it...I don't hate her...I can almost admire her determination...but...I want a name other than Bush/Clinton to grace our home at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue...it's time to get out of the rut we're in...disclaimer: jmo
wb
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
25. I don't know if "seriousness" is the proper term, but you're right about Clinton.
I know that the Republicans are the ones who shot him down, but by heavens, did he have to go out and buy the gun and load it for them? Roosevelt and Kennedy both had affairs while in the White House. So what? Washington and Jefferson owned slaves. That was then, this is now and that behavior is not approved of by the American people. Someone who is as astute a politician as Bill Clinton is claimed to be should have realized this. He ducked a bullet during the primaries over his behavior. He should have learned his lesson. Instead he kept on tempting fate, and we're all still suffering the consequences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 05:50 AM
Response to Original message
18. Attacking Bill would be a big mistake
don't take my word for it though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cobalt1999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
20. Nothing and no one will keep Bill Clinton away from a campaign
The man is a campaigning machine and loves it. He'll become more and more visible as the campaign goes on.

He also provides a great contrast to how things were before Bush and after 8 years of Bush, people are a little nostalgic for the Clinton years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
22. Let me tell you something...don't even try threatening people
with your advise on how they should or want to run their campaigns because they'll face some kind of wrath from the Left and the Right.

Here's our motto:

"Bring IT!" if you've got it, but don't "cry" when YOU get it back... 10 fold!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
23. Nah, don't believe a word of that.
Love him or hate him, he's still a crowd pleaser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
26. If Hillary takes the nomination, these topics will come up.
Maybe we should bring them up now. Either she'll knock them down and we can get on to the real issues during the general campaign, or, she won't be able to dodge them and better we find out now then later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Naturyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 03:32 AM
Response to Original message
27. I like Bill in general - it's hard not to.
But I haven't forgotten that he threw welfare under the bus in a fit of opportunistic pandering. It was a very unfortunate move and one a lot of progressives can't forgive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 03:47 AM
Response to Original message
28. I disagree. He's an asset and HRC is entitled to use him.
She paid her dues for whatever benefit it gives her. I don't begrudge her that. I like Bill Clinton. I just don't support his wife in the primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Me too. It would be WRONG not to include him now.
And, for ANY of the Dem candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sampsonblk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
30. Ummm your nuclear option has one flaw
Yeah the other candidates could go talk about Monica, but they will never win the Dem primary by doing that. The first Dem who brings up Monica up will be out of the race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
31. I can understand why Obamatons would want to keep Bill off the campaign trail...
Edited on Mon Oct-01-07 12:32 PM by SaveElmer
For Hillary it's like having Joe Montana as the backup quarterback...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jcrew2001 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
32. what's Sexual harassment?
is swapping sexual favors for jobs considered sexual harassment?

it never occurred to me that what bill did was illegal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
33. I'll take the Big Dawg any day of the week.
"the Hillary camp shouldn't get mad if the Dems start bringing up all the negative shit that happened in the 90's, like NAFTA, outsourcing, China, Monica, impeachment, Monica, billing scandals, Monica, fundraising scandals, etc., etc."

Let me get this straight you're claiming the Clinton campaign was first to go negative?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC