Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

2013? Get Our Troops Out Now: Gov Richardson Huff Post OPED

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
seasat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 02:44 PM
Original message
2013? Get Our Troops Out Now: Gov Richardson Huff Post OPED
Edited on Sun Sep-30-07 02:51 PM by seasat
Bill Richardson posted this article on the 28th. The comments are already in the 100s:

They all change the mission and leave troops in Iraq. I end the war and get all the troops out.

Edwards and Obama have said that they will get the combat troops out of Iraq. But they would leave behind tens of thousands of other troops unprotected, in the middle of a civil war, indefinitely. It doesn't make any sense.

Clinton told her own military advisors that she expects to have troops in Iraq at the end of her second term in office, in 2017.
...
It really isn't complicated: we need to end this war. For the stability of the region, the safety of our troops, and the security of our nation, we need to end this war. I am the only major candidate who will get all of our troops out of Iraq, with no troops left behind.


For those that claim Bill Richardson isn't being honest because he would leave a detachment to guard the embassy. Here's what he said on the subject.

But if it said 1,000 to protect the American embassy, that's fine with me. It's a Marine detachment. It's part of our diplomatic corps. I wouldn't even consider that a residual force. Of course I would permit that. But residual forces -- 5,000 to guard an embassy -- that means that the embassy is not safe. I would pull the embassy if it is not safe.


The embassy guard is a specialized marine unit that is in our embassies all around the world and no one reasonable would equate them to combat forces in Iraq. In addition, embassy property is considered the territory of the country that owns the embassy, if you want to argue semantics over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Richardson is my governor, and he does what he says
he will do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. We definately need his diplomatic skills
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. If people were a bit more impartial and didn't watch so
much dog-and-pony-show TV, they'd realize that this guy's qualifications are absolutely stellar, in terms of both foreign and domestic policy.

He's no movie star, and he's new to campaigning on a national scale, but his qualifications are excellent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. You speak so highly of his skills. So I was wondering if you
heard about his efforts to stop the recount of Kerry's New Mexico votes. Do you know anything about that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seasat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Here's what I found on the subject
I wrote a journal article on the recount issue and linked to various sources covering it. It also should be added that NM had school board elections in early February and the machines had to be reprogrammed for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Ad nauseum
on these boards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ediacara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. I was a big Richardson fan, but he totally bombed at the LGBT debate
And quite frankly, he seemed drunk. It's too bad, he's head shoulders more qualified than anyone else running for president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I think he was jet lagged, if I remember correctly.
No, he's not the epitome of poised politics, granted. But his view of LGBT matters is quite liberal, I assure you.

And I agree he is the best qualified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. kickeroo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC