Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Edwards' message may resonate: The Rise of the Have-Nots

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 02:46 AM
Original message
Why Edwards' message may resonate: The Rise of the Have-Nots
From the American Prospect:

http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=the_rise_of_the_havenots

SNIP

It's no great achievement for a people to recognize that their nation's economy has tanked, but recognizing that their nation's class structure has slowly but fundamentally altered is a more challenging task. It's harder still for a people who are conditioned, as Americans are, not to see their nation in terms of class.

Which is why a poll released this month by the Pew Research Center reveals a transformation of Americans' sense of their country and themselves that is startling. Pew asked Americans if their country was divided between haves and have-nots. In 1988, when Gallup asked that question, 26 percent of respondents said yes, while 71 percent said no. In 2001, when Pew asked it, 44 percent said yes and 53 percent said no. But when Pew asked it again this summer, the number of Americans who agreed that we live in a nation divided into haves and have-nots had risen to 48 percent -- exactly the same as the number of Americans who disagreed.

Americans' assessment of their own place in the economy has altered, too. In 1988, fully 59 percent identified themselves as haves and just 17 percent as have-nots. By 2001, the haves had dwindled to 52 percent and the have-nots had risen to 32 percent. This summer, just 45 percent of Americans called themselves haves, while 34 percent called themselves have-nots.

These are epochal shifts, of epochal significance. The American middle class has toppled into a world of temporary employment, jobs without benefits, retirement without security. Harder times have come to left and right alike: The percentage of Republicans who call themselves haves has declined by 13 points since 1988; the percentage of Democratic haves has declined by 12 points.

SNIP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 02:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. We can only hope they catch on before it is too late. n/t
:kick: & R


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ MEW Donating Member (432 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 03:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I don't think they will catch on.
Ask those same people if they still believe that they will some day be one of the haves and what political party they feel stands for their best interests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 04:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. those stats are stunning
Wow. The American Dream. Good bye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 04:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. It is a message that is resonating with me. Let's hope that it
resonates with the most entertained population in the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Apollo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 04:59 AM
Response to Original message
5. What about the missing 21%?
"This summer, just 45 percent of Americans called themselves haves, while 34 percent called themselves have-nots."

Who are the other 21%?

The ones who call themselves "don't got nuttin's"? :eyes:

Legal disclaimer: Sorry if not funny. No offense intended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowdogintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. they were the ones not asked. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 05:19 AM
Response to Original message
6. It resonates, but he's not the right conduit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Th1onein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
7. But, but, but, WAIT........
Isn't this the OWNERSHIP society?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ninga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
9. Edwards is like a running back, head down and pounding the line, working to gain
1st down yards.

This is the biggest test of his life.......and ours.....if you believe he can bring home the populist message.

The game is long, and we are barely into the 3rd quarter.

If Edwards is truly made of Presidential qualities, then he has a game plan for this run. For those who underestimate him, I say, just watch.

I believe the work that he did for more that 20 years, planning strategy, doing research, and auguring the law, serves him well....but more importantly, can serve this country, and finally give us a voice at the podium that speaks for all the classes....one that is long overdue.



We no nothing, the game is not over.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Apollo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. I read that Edwards was a quarterback, back in High School
Compare with George W. Bush - who was a cheerleader.

There must be some kind of a message in there :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
11. West Coast morning kick.
:kick:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Thanks, greyhound1966.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. You're welcome. n/t
:kick::hi:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
12. And sHIllary wants an increase in the h1-b visa cap. Thanks for nothing. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Naturyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
15. Yeah, this is the attraction of Edwards for me.
I'm not drawn to Edwards on any issue but class. The fact that he is willing to talk about class makes him the most appealing of the "top tier" candidates. I'm a Kucinich guy, but I could get behind Edwards if he gets the nod.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC