Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senator Edwards' funding limitation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 02:18 PM
Original message
Senator Edwards' funding limitation
Since he accepted public financing, I believe there is a cap on the amount of money he can raise. Dean and Kerry were the only candidates who declined public financing. With Dean dropping out, does that mean that if we want a candidate who can legally raise a huge campaign warchest to fight Bush it has to be John Kerry? Has the candidate been decided for us already?

What is the public financing situation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SangamonTaylor Donating Member (537 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. yes, I would like to know more about this as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cheezus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. issue ads and 527s
I think the money is still there to back Edwards, but it won't go through him.

I really wish we had sane finance laws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democratreformed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Some new info
I haven't read it all yet. Just thought I'd pass it along.

Link: http://www.start.earthlink.net/newsarticle?cat=9&aid=D80PQBSG1_story

Headline is: FEC Mulls New Limits on Big Donations

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. just for the primary, right?
Edited on Wed Feb-18-04 02:26 PM by SeattleDem
I think the primary and general election are separate. If he accepted public funding now, it's just for the primary.

If he wins the nomination, he can choose again whether or not to take public money and thus have to abide by the spending caps.

It wouldn't make sense to have to declare during the primary your intention regarding public financing of a general election when you have not yet been made the candidate!

on edit: someone please tell me if I'm wrong!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. no, I don't think it is just for the primaries
This is a situation I heard described on broadcast tv or radio a few months ago. With Dean out, it is a serious consideration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. best link I could find
Edited on Wed Feb-18-04 02:39 PM by SeattleDem
is to this AP article about Clark, but it says repeatedly that the acceptance of public funds is for primaries (which, to me, implies it's not for the general election)

http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/politics/7260294.htm
Wesley Clark, the latest entrant into the Democratic presidential race, has decided to give his campaign a cash infusion by accepting public financing for the primaries.The decision announced Thursday means Clark will be limited to $45 million in overall primary spending and face state-by-state spending caps.

on edit: okay, this is really the best link! :-)
http://www.fec.gov/press/20031204matching.html
EDWARDS SIXTH PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE DECLARED ELIGIBLE
FOR PRIMARY MATCHING FUNDS IN 2004 RACE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Good work--there is an overall spending limit
From that FEC site: "Other requirements to be declared eligible include agreeing to an overall spending limit" -- I have a bad feeling it is a cap of around $50 to $100 Million.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. Senator Edwards's message preservation: having the most money isn't
a good thing.

Imagine Kerry and Bush slugging it out. A 500 milionaire (Kerry) vs a 10 millionaire (Bush).

If you want to turn off the working class, that's the formula.

Now imagine Edwards vs Bush. He will make the inevitable funding shortfall vs Bush into an ASSET.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
9. If Nominee Edwards picks Dean for VP, can use Dean's nonpublic status
to go for unlimited funding? Ok, this is a wild wacky idea, I doubt if it is legal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elsiesummers Donating Member (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
10. Matching just for the primary but,
the problem is that late in the primary, when the nominee had been selected but the general election, technically, had not begun, Gore's primary fund was bone dry, so he couldn't fight back against attacks by Bush.

Apparently the 527's will help fill the gap - but yes there are questions about the size of the donations allowable.

I believe that Bush took matching for the General Election last time. Since the time frame is so short, would expect that again, but who knows? Maybe this is where the Democrats could surprise and outdo Bush late in the game, by not accepting funds at a point when Bush is.

Here is a question: If Dean chose to support Edwards some time prior to the nomination, could Dean continue to run primary adds against Bush, or possibly even promoting Edwards? Could Howard Dean "approve" a positive message about John Edwards late in the primary race?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. then donors would dump money into the Dean campaign to fund Edwards
That would get the GOPs crying "foul" (which is all that they know how to do--cry).

I think your paragraph 3 is more intriguing. I am sure that donor will hedge their bets with both parties' candidates. What I don't know is if a huge amount of money is going to pour into the Democratic candidate's campaign budget. I certainly hope so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democratreformed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. GOP trying to stop 527s
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
13. If it's a long fight they will both be broke in the end
we need to decide by Super Tuesday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodHelpUsAll2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Edwards has a cap
He took matching funds so he has a cap of I believe it's 45mil. Once that is spent he is done until June. If he gets the nomination then it all starts over again. Any donors who have maxed out at the 2000.00 now can start donating again once the primaries are over and he can build money back up that way. Bush is NOT taking matching funds so he can spend spend spend from now until after the election is over. No, Dean can not continue to raise money through his campaign to support Edwards. However, a 527 can buy ads and airtime supporting who ever they want. Why do you think there was such pressure to get it down to one man? It is my belief that it would have been a much better deal to have EVERYONE stay in the race until after convention. Now that we have only 2 in the race, it will be much easier for the Bush team to start setting their sights on the nominee and commence with the beating. And since they are quite privy on who has and did what as far as money they are armed with everything they need to start the hacking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
15. Edwards would need whole schedule to win. Cap less important.
If Edwards manages to win, he will need the whole primary schedule to clinch victory. That would leave less than two months to the convention. That could be dealt with by playing up the VP choice in the media for most of that time pretty easily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC