Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama misses ANOTHER vote - This time Feingold/Reid to end the war.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 01:46 PM
Original message
Obama misses ANOTHER vote - This time Feingold/Reid to end the war.
Edited on Wed Oct-03-07 02:03 PM by jsamuel
It got 28 votes including Clinton, but Obama did not vote according to this post:
http://www.mydd.com/story/2007/10/3/143521/492

For reference, he also missed the MoveOn (Cornyn) vote and they Iran War (Kyl-Lieberman) vote.

Update:
Comments posted say he is campaigning today and that he is not the front runner like Clinton. The amendment would have gone down anyway.

However, this does not help when a narrative is forming around him not voting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 01:47 PM
Original message
Bookmarked so I can check to see if there's anyone who can prove he
voted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. There seems to be a disturbing pattern developing with him.
And I don't like it. These people should still show up to do their jobs, despite running for President.

Kudos to Hillary for being there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. Not good. Any reason given?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Some Obama supporters feel showing up to vote in the senate is a bad thing...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. I believe he's campaigning in Iowa today.
To be fair, he's so far behind in the polls, that he needs the campaign dates a lot more than Hillary does. Couple that with the fact that even the most optimistic of souls would have to admit Feingold/Reid stood a snowball's chance in hell, and you can understand why Obama stayed in Iowa. (Understand, maybe, even if you don't approve or excuse.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Agreed.
If the vote was on the line, he would have likely come back for it.

At the same he should also realize the people of IL elected him to office only 3 years ago. They deserve more than half representation. If he starts missing alot of votes now, how about the heat of primary elections and if he is the nominee the strain of the GE. All of the candidate are going to miss votes but being perceived early on as missing votes is not good for his campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Party line or not, he should be forced to take a stand every now and then
The Iran vote would have passed even if he had shown up and voted against it. It's the principle of the matter. Every other presidential candidate can show up to vote, why can't he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. If the people of Illinois are bothered by it they can vote him out of office
But last time I checked his approval ratings are in the 70's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
21. NO I do not understand this crap. Is the man still drawing a paycheck and
is he still claiming expenses as a friggin' senator???? He needs to get his ass back and do his job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #21
42. Whatever. If it were Hillary, you'd sing a different tune.
I'm sick and tired of all the partisan hackery around here these days. Clinton, Obama, Edwards, or any other Dem. candidate would make an excellent president, and these sort of needling, pissant posts do nothing except make otherwise agreeable Democrats try to rip each others heads off. Its stupid, childish, and counterproductive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. The hell I would, Don't tell me what I would do, you don't have a clue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #44
52. Sorry, you're right.
Remove "Hillary" from that previous post and fill in with the candidate of your choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElizabethDC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. Seriously?!
Unbelievable. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. He was doing a big campaign swing thru Iowa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. Biden, Clnton, Obama and Dodd refrained from voting on a couple of issues
over the past two days so I wondered if they were off doing some candidatey things.

I just went to the senate site to see the vote results but they haven't been posted yet -- they will be within the hour so I'll post at that time if nobody else has.

I wonder what's up? It doesn't make sense that Obama is "avoiding" -- he's got to know that would give fodder to opponents...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. He did not vote for the war, so he does not feel he needs to help ending it.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. One of the criticisms of John Kerry and John Edwards in 2004
Was that they were among the tops on list of Senators who missed votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
25. Because Senators miss votes when they are campaigning
Serious debate doesn't actually take place on the Senate floor. The Senate leadership let's them know if it's important for them to be there to vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #25
32. This was supposed to be their entire terms including the campaigns)
I do agree that they already know how many votes they going to get even before they officially record it.

I just find it ironic that this was the criticism from the right against Kerry/Edwards. During the VP debate Cheneny lied and claimed he had never met Edwards because Edwards was never around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. "criticism from the right"?
Edited on Wed Oct-03-07 02:34 PM by Lirwin2
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=3574936&mesg_id=3575072

Edit: Just noticed who that poster was. Yep, it confirms that the critisicm comes from the right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. So the right didn't criticize him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Yes, I just confirmed that the right criticized him
That particular poster gets all his information from the right. Check out his "Clinton let Osama go" post sometime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #40
48. You confirmed? ok
I don't care about the "Clinton let Osama go" post. Some of these things you've got to ignore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
11. He's going to miss the entire week
The leadership in the Senate usually knows how the votes will go down, and will let candidates know if they are needed in the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. It's not about whether the bill will pass, it's about him taking a stand for once
Nobody knows where he stands on issues like this, because he doesn't show up to vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Sounds like he's pulling a Clinton...
with all that fence-sitting...flip-flopping. I'm not voting for either one of those two. I'm not sure who I'm voting FOR yet, other than it won't be Hillary of Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Clinton shows up for more votes than any other candidate
She has missed less than 9% of all votes, while Obama has missed more than 25%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #17
61. So what? She voted for Liberman/Kyl....
nuff said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Oh, bullshit
he's been pretty damn clear about the war and ending it. It was the topic of a major speech he made just yesterday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Talk is easy
As Obama apparently has learned, action is not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Running back to washington to cast a vote on a bill that was sure to lose
That's action?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. OK, let's play by your logic:
Even had Hillary voted against the IWR, it still would have passed. I geuss it doesn't count then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #23
35. The problem is that Hillary voted for the IWR, supported the Iraq war
and continued to support it until it became political poison. Now, I'm assured, it was all Bush's fault because he went about it wrong. Great.

I would have much preferred she skip the vote altogether.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #18
58. Words are easy. Action please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #58
59. Words are very easy
Especially when there is no substance or thought put behind it, as i've learned from reading numerous anti-Obama posts on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
14. time to take a stand, pal
This is starting to look like a pattern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #14
60. Yeah, I think the same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rockholm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #14
73. I believe it is a pattern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
19. I read in one of these threads
That Obama voted present on some tough votes when he was in the Illinois Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. yes, abortion votes
He stood strongly for a woman's right to choice by voting "present" on every controversial abortion bill that passed through the illinois legislature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. That was the strategy he worked up with planned parenthood
"We at Planned Parenthood view those as leadership votes," Pam Sutherland, the president and CEO of the Illinois Planned Parenthood Council, told ABC News. "We worked with him specifically on his strategy. The Republicans were in control of the Illinois Senate at the time. They loved to hold votes on 'partial birth' and 'born alive'. They put these bills out all the time . . . because they wanted to pigeonhole Democrats."

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2007/07/obama-abortion-.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. I don't give a rats ass if planned parenthood approved it
He was faced with a woman's right to choose, and he made his position clear, for what? Some political points?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #33
43. You're right. What does planned parenthood know about abortion rights?
Fucking losers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #43
49. There's a logical fallacy called "appeal to authority" that you've apparently fallen for
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #49
54. No, it's called legislative strategy
designed to minimize the impact of republican shenanigans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
26. I guess when Edwards skipped a third of his votes in 2003, it was no big deal?
http://www.alternet.org/election04/19507/

22 of 62 votes were missed by Edwards in 2003. That's what happens when you're running for President.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. How come Hillary hasnt missed a third? or a fourth? or even a tenth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. She's the frontrunner
and doesn't need to campaign as hard as the others, right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. Doing your job in the senate overrides the need to campaign
Obama was elected to represent his constituents in the senate. If he believes that running for president is more important at this time, then he should relinquish his seat. It's very simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. Did you hold the same position with Kerry and Edwards last time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #38
45. Strongly.
I don't care what fucking political party you're from, or who you are, you should NOT be campaigning so much that you miss 1/4 of ALL votes. You can say "well, they would have failed anyways", but it's impossible to know beforehand with many of the votes Obama was AWOL for (such as the Iran vote). He needs to either do the job he was elected to do, or give up his seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #45
50. I'm sure he'll do that
When he's elected president.

Pardon me if I ignore the crocodile tears from Hillary supporters on this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #38
69. Which vote back in 2003 or 2004 was as important as the ones Obama has been missing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #28
74. Because they schedule the votes to accommodate her
and sandbag Obama. DUH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Why I included the update...
Edited on Wed Oct-03-07 02:32 PM by jsamuel
He isn't the front runner like Clinton and does not have the luxury of being way ahead. But like I said, you can bet Clinton will use it against him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #29
37. Ah, so, you've posted this out of sympathy with Obama, fearing he'll be smeared like Edwards was?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. I posted it because I knew it would be an issue.
Edited on Wed Oct-03-07 02:38 PM by jsamuel
Edwards missed votes in 2003/4 are not really much of an issue in this campaign. But yes, I can see that it is unfair to criticize Obama too harshly for missed votes. However, I think he should have voted on the Kyl/Lieberman one. He was not supposed to be in Iowa that day. That one was very important even if it was going to pass anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #41
46. Point taken.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #41
47. His campaign released a statement on that bill
Senator Obama clearly recognizes the serious threat posed by Iran. However, he does not agree with the president that the best way to counter that threat is to keep large numbers of troops in Iraq, and he does not think that now is the time for saber-rattling towards Iran. In fact, he thinks that our large troop presence in Iraq has served to strengthen Iran - not weaken it. He believes that diplomacy and economic pressure, such as the divestment bill that he has proposed, is the right way to pressure the Iranian regime. Accordingly, he would have opposed the Kyl-Lieberman amendment had he been able to vote today.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0907/Obama_No_on_KylLieberman.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #29
55. as she should, he has a job to do NOW, campaigning isn't what he is being paid to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
27. As I type this the thread above yours is
"Obama: "Let's be clear: without that vote there would have been no war"

Strikes me as a little ironic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
51. This is hilarious to watch.
The Obama people attack Hillary. The Edwards people attack Obama. Hillary supporter attack anyone left of center. And 'round and 'round it goes.

Sometimes, it's nice not to have a candidate.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #51
56. You just described democracy in action...
Been going on for 231 years...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #56
64. Democracy would be debating issues.
I do not see a lot of issues debated on GDP these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #64
66. There is little if any debating on here n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
53. How are we suppose to know where he stand if he doesn't vote on something, anything!
Talk is cheap, he can slam others for the way they vote but he won't vote so who knows....?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #53
57. his supporters have a direct line to his brain. They can tell you what he is thinking at any time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #57
71. L...O...L
That one needs to go to the Wyldwolf top ten!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
62. I'm waiting for an Obama supporter to say how brave, smart
and courageous it was for Obama to miss this vote like they did the last time he missed an important vote!

:rofl:

I guess when you are so attached to your candidate any lame excuse or feeble rationalization looks good!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avrdream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
63. Actually, didn't McCain do the same thing?
If I remember correctly, the Bush campaign was all over him like stink on shit when he missed so many votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
65. An article this weekend said that Obama would be campaigning in Iowa all week.
He's going to miss a lot of votes. If his vote is need to pass a bill, he'll be there.

Any senator running for president will miss a lot of votes, as did Kerry and Edwards.

McCain doesn't even show up when the voting is close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
67. Since Dodd stood with Feingold on the Senate floor this morning and
Biden, Clinton and Dodd all voted for his amendment while Obama didn't bother to show up....

Maybe Feingold should re-evaluate who he is going to endorse?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #67
68. all 3 of Feingold's offices said no endorsement is planned
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #67
75. Maybe that's why the vote was scheduled
To sandbag the outsider.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
70. Thank you for your concern.
Your faux outrage is spectacular.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
72. Edwards didn't vote either
Oops! :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC