Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democrats Prefer Clinton to Her Rivals to Handle Most Policy Issues

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-05-07 09:23 AM
Original message
Democrats Prefer Clinton to Her Rivals to Handle Most Policy Issues
Edited on Fri Oct-05-07 09:24 AM by William769
PRINCETON, NJ -- Sen. Hillary Clinton, who currently leads the Democratic race for the 2008 presidential nomination by more than 20 percentage points in a USA Today/Gallup poll, is also chosen by Democrats (including Democratic-leaning independents) as the candidate best able to handle many national issues. In fact, according to the latest Gallup Panel survey, Democrats perceive Clinton as the best prepared of the top three Democratic contenders to handle 13 of 17 different challenges that could face the next president.

While Clinton dominates on core policy issues, Sen. Barack Obama does relatively well on the handful of items included that tap into the candidates' ability to relate to people and heal divisions in the country. Democrats do not consider former Sen. John Edwards the best candidate on any issue.

Clinton Walks Away With Top Policy Issues

When given the choice of the top three Democratic candidates -- including Clinton, Obama, and Edwards -- an outright majority of Democrats say Clinton would do the best job on 6 out of 17 issues measured in the poll. This includes some of the major domestic policy issues that Americans typically rate among the most important to their vote for federal offices: healthcare, the economy, and education. It also includes two of the leading values issues in today's culture: abortion and gay marriage.



http://www.galluppoll.com/content/?ci=28897

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-05-07 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well, then, I guess such a sweeping conclusion means I'm not
a democrat. Pity.
I'd thought they were more like me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-05-07 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. good thing they did`t have polling in 1860
because lincoln would have never been elected...he certainly did`t have nearly as many "qualifications" as hillary does today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-05-07 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I guess we are lucky it's 2007 then. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-05-07 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. self delete. Double post.
Edited on Fri Oct-05-07 09:36 AM by William769
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-05-07 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
5. Would that be ALL Democrats?
Because I guess I must not be one, even though I've been going to their caucuses and all that stuff for the last 30 years...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-05-07 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I guess some people just get left out in the cold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-05-07 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. To me, it's a no-brainer. She is so much better than the rest of the field
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-05-07 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
8. The question is how do they come to that conclusion
by her answers? I'm still confused on where she is on many major issues. I know that her judicial appointees would be ok and she is good on some domestic issues but I'm really cloudy on other issues when trying to get a handle on her positions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC