Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary's real weakness shows

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 08:49 AM
Original message
Hillary's real weakness shows
This just my thoughts but all the tons of news, polls, and articles
saying it is over and Ms. Hill is at 66% (what ever) and nobody else has a chance
strikes me as a "false flag" operation trying to tell everybody it is
over even before the first vote is cast. Could all this be smoke and
mirrors to cover up her high negative #s, questionable votes, corp.
ties, and real lack of support among many many dems and liberals?

Money she has got ..... the media she has got (Hell Fox is pimping her) .....
political infrastructure she has got ...... but does she have any real support?



Can you see the real me, can you?
Can you see the real me, can you?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. so the dozens of polls
from a variety of sources are all lying to us? Unlikely.

And do you know what a "false flag" operation is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. The polling groups may all be paid off by the evil "Clinton-istes"
"Clinton-istes" = radical Hillary backers who are from Amherst College and get
their money from a suken German U - Boat off of Long Island ---- Gold Bars

A False Flag Operation is the exact opposite of a True Flag Operation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Well
they MAY be, but it's highly unlikely. Polling companies have one thing to sell - accuracy. To purposely skew polls in the way you suggest would ruin them if the word ever got out.

And the thousands of employees of those firms are keeping the secret? And what about the polls run by the campaigns themselves. You think Edwards, Obama, et. al, wouldn't say anything if THEIR polls showed drastically different results? Unlikely.

I don't understand your use of the term "false flag" in this discussion. Has Hillary bombed somebody while wearing an Obama disguise?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. Proof


Gold Bars

Real Flag Operation



False Flag Operation

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #14
24. You're not making any sense
what does a picture of gold bars have to do with the assertion that every polling company is paid off by Clinton, and that the thousands of employees, as well as her opponents, are keeping it hushed up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. The Gold Bars are from the U Boat that is off of Long Island
and the Radical Clinton-istes use the money to hire paid bloggers
to sell the idea that "it is all over" and Hillary has got it in the bag.

BTW The U-boat is one of many that Prescott Bush had placed off
the United States in late 1944 to pay for his "New World Order." :tinfoilhat:

Off to get the Gold.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. The Clintons are using gold
they got from a U-boat off Long Island to pay off pollsters and bloggers?

How interesting.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #25
45. Fabulous picture of the Clintons. Reminds me of the Kennedys
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. So what you are saying then...
Is that Hillary's operation is so efficient, they can accurately predict which random set of voters every one of these organization is going to poll...and gets there ahead of time to pay them off...?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. In my Real Life Polling ,I have yet to meet a person who
would vote for her ,execpt for a few outspoken people here at the DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. So what you are saying then...
Is that Pew, CNN, Opinion Dynamics, Gallup, Harris, NBC, Washington Post, Fox News, ABC, Insider Advantage, AP-IPSOS, ARG, Rasmussen, and Survey USA...are all randomly calling the same small subset of people that support Hillary, and missing the vast majority that oppose her?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. Those people you mention Pew ,CNN ect ect
I've never met them. So I can't say whom they would vote for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. So you think Pew and CNN are not organizations...
Edited on Sat Oct-06-07 09:09 AM by SaveElmer
But people? Like there is someone named Joe Pew publishing random polls...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #13
26. I Never Met Geronimo But I Know He Existed
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #5
16. Sometimes conspiracy paranoia is just funny
Just to feed it a bit...Aya Reiko posted

some amazing poll graphics.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x3582715
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Talking to your small circle of friends
is not "polling".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
32. My thoughts exactly. And I talk politics to a lot of people with varying opininons
Not a one of them wants clinton to be the dem nominee. Not a one of them have been polled..

I don't know who they re getting through to on these telephone polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #32
34. Polls Are Based On Random Samples And Inferential Statistics
DSB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #34
46. Random samples of people who actually answer their telephone
as opposed to call screening with caller ID or an answering machine...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #46
50. What is your point?
The polls are wrong? Hillary is really losing because they aren't calling the right people?
People who answer their phone are more likely to choose Clinton than the other candidates?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #32
37. Well they do keep list and call back on the same people .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. So your contention then...
Is that Pew, CNN, Opinion Dynamics, Gallup, Harris, NBC, Washington Post, Fox News, ABC, Insider Advantage, AP-IPSOS, ARG, Rasmussen, and Survey USA...are manipulating their numbers to aid Hillary in her effort to "cover up" her true negatives?

Interesting theory...

:tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Heres another Theory
the IWR wasn't really about going to war in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. A the great "progressive" bogeyman...
How about answering the question...is it your contention that every polling organization is manipulating its numbers to aid Hillary?...yes or no? It's a simple question...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #10
19. If you need a Yes or No , answer try asking Hillary.
As for myself I don't answer Hypothetical Questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. So in other words...
You don't feel any need to back up your "theories" with any kind of evidence...just sort of a random brain fart you decided to put out there for us to enjoy?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Egg zack lee
The more I see "It is all over ... Hillary has it in the bag" the more I get a sense of
being sold a bill of goods.

Good Lord she voted for a statement that only could be seen as an incrimental step
to military conflict w/ Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Wrong on both counts...
However, you did not answer the question...

I mean the ONLY way your theory is correct is if these organizations are in cahoots with her campaign...right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #11
22. Answers
Well the people called by the polling groups had phones
The Clinton operations has phones ..... need i say more
about "Operation Digital Down Load 2008?" :rofl:

The Kyle Lieberman amendment boiled down is one more
step down a path to military action w/ Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
15. The only poll that matters is on election day /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Who said otherwise?...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
21. That's below the belt puttin a picture of Hillary Rupert
Edited on Sat Oct-06-07 09:16 AM by itsrobert
Where does it stop?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. It can stop w/ you.
Thanx for getting "it."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #21
29. It's not below the belt. You haters need your little kindergarten therapy
I would never begrudge y'all of that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. He's Very Clever
I'll bet the other kids in junior high school look up to him in awe...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #30
38. Only when displaying his signature arm pit repertoire. The rest of the time
:boring:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
28. One Of The Polls That Showed Her Ahead Was Conducted By Peter Hart
I guess Peter Hart is a Republican shill:




" Mr. Hart has represented more than 40 U.S. senators and 30 governors, ranging from Hubert Humphrey and Lloyd Bentsen, to Jay Rockefeller and Bob Graham. "


http://www.hartresearch.com/about/bios/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #28
31. Ok you've convinced me , time to fall in line..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. Your Logic Escapes Me But I Think It Escaped You First...Better Run And Find It...
I was just defeating the silly, silly assertion that all the polls are rigged...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #33
35. I don't buy into the Polls this early in the Running.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #35
39. I Agree Their Predictive Value Is Limited To The Time Frame Of When The Poll Was Commissioned
Edited on Sat Oct-06-07 10:07 AM by DemocratSinceBirth
But that's a lot different than saying people are making them up...

We're better and smarter than that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #33
48. I think polls are all about the way questions are asked...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #28
40. Didn't one poll have Kerry 10 points over the Chimp the day before 2004 Election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #40
43. No...The Final Polls Were Spot On
http://www.pollingreport.com/2004.htm


Almost all within the margin of error
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #40
44. I don't recall that
but a single outlier is possible. but all the polls I saw the day before the election were correct within the margin of error.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #28
51. Thanks for the link,
which is not so suprisingly lacking in most of these opinion OP's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
36. One pointer I do not trust is the amount of money she has raised.
It would not be the first time that pugs had crossed the lines to interfere with Democratic primaries so they could have the candidate of their choice instead of our choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #36
41. Go To Open Secrets
I looked in my zip codes...Lots of prominent Democrats and businesspeople who give to (both) parties in the desire to cover their bases...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #41
47. Absolutely, and that does not add up to support either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #47
49. Do You Know Which Candidate Has Received The Most Money From Wall Street?
Hint- it's not Hillary Clinton...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #36
42. repukes send money to the dems while their own candidates
are standing at the corner begging? Yeah right :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC