It had the earmark of a 1960s civil rights’ rally. But it was the 91st annual NAACP Freedom Fund Banquet in Charleston, S.C. in September. And there was Democratic presidential frontrunner Hillary Clinton with arms linked on the dais, swaying, rocking, and belting out a rendition of “We Shall Overcome.”
Clinton proceeded to give a rip-roaring speech in which she publicly vowed to do everything from aggressively fighting hate crimes to strengthening voting rights. It was the kind of civil rights speech that top Democrats in campaigns past have sprinted from like the plague.
Two months before Clinton’s South Carolina love fest, she uttered a word that top Democratic presidential contenders in the recent past have virtually exorcized from their vocabulary: the word “racism.” During a debate at Howard University, she intimated that racism drove public policy in how Americans dealt with the HIV/AIDS plague.
Clinton told the mostly black audience that if young white women were dying at the rate young blacks are from AIDS, there would be a national outcry.
The audience went wild. That kind of blatant talk wasn’t heard from Democratic presidential contenders in two failed presidential campaigns against Bush. Clinton’s aim was to send a forceful message to chief Democratic presidential campaign rival Barack Obama that she – not he – is the real civil rights candidate. And judging from the polls, the message has been received.
During the early months after both tossed their hats in the ring, Clinton and Obama ran side by side in black voters’ avowed admiration and loyalty. In a June 2007 Gallup poll, blacks by 8-to-1 margins had favorable views of both them. When it comes to whom they’ll actually vote for, it’s no contest. Clinton gaps Obama with black women voters, especially lower income, working class black women. Nearly three times more black women say they’ll back Clinton over him.
She is a woman, mother and, most importantly, is regarded by many black women as a strong advocate of health care and women’s interests. But Clinton also runs neck and neck with Obama in the race to net the overall votes of blacks. It’s no surprise that Clinton has outflanked Obama on the civil rights front. Just look at Bill Clinton.
Despite his centrist, and at times very race-neutral and hostile policies, especially his emphasis on crime, middle-class tax cuts, and proposals to overhaul welfare without significant boosts in spendings on jobs, education and child care, Bill Clinton was seen as the president – with the arguable exception of Lyndon Johnson – who did more for blacks than any other president.
The nostalgia and fond remembrances for the Clinton name still sends shivers up the spines of many black voters. “The name is magical in a lot of black communities,” notes South Carolina Congressman James Clyburn, and some of those residual emotions are still there.
Clyburn wasn’t measuring Bill for his place in American history; he was eyeing the lift that he could give to wife Hillary, and Clyburn, as expected, was on the dais in an arm lock with Hillary Clinton at the Freedom Banquet.
But Clinton hasn’t rested solely on her husband’s laurels and his gargantuan fundraising capacity. She has carefully parlayed a strong network among black ministers, politicians, and Democrats within and without the Congressional Black Caucus, and state black elected officials.
In addition to the goodwill of blacks and the endorsement of legions of black politicians, she has a heftier campaign war chest than Obama and will spread money around to sweeten the pot to bag other potential political endorsers.
However, the warm fuzzy feelings for her husband, her contacts, her money, and her civil rights pronouncements by themselves wouldn’t necessarily guarantee her political one-upmanship over Obama with blacks. Polls consistently show that she’s light years ahead of him on the experience and qualifications scale and that translates to electability. That means volumes to black voters. The loathe of Bush by black voters is so deep and implacable that they are desperate for a Democrat who can snatch back the White House. The hard reality for Obama is that in a head-to-head contest with the Republican nominee, he would need the backing of a near majority of white and Hispanic voters in several key swing states – and that includes Louisiana and Florida – to win the general election. At this stage of the presidential game, that’s virtually impossible for a black candidate.
Black voters are not naive about Hillary Clinton. They know that GOP hardliners are licking their chops at a Clinton candidacy and will load up their barrels to tar her as evil incarnate. Yet, she still seems a far better bet than Obama to beat back the assault and raise her hand to take the oath of office in January 2009. That’s no knock against Obama, but it tells why she trumps him with black voters.
http://news.ncmonline.com/news/view_article.html?article_id=46c3631f71ca76aead65446b78482173
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
