jefferson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 05:09 PM
Original message |
Poll question: Which Republican loser would you most like to see as their nominee? |
|
Edited on Tue Oct-09-07 05:10 PM by jefferson_dem
Which of the losers do you believe would be the easiest to crush next Fall?
...only viable candidates included in this poll.
|
mwb970
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 05:13 PM
Response to Original message |
1. It's hard to see any of these guys getting any real traction. |
|
With Bush in the dumper and Bush's Iraq War raging, people aren't going to get very worked up over another Republican any time soon. Even Newt!
|
Mojambo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 05:15 PM
Response to Original message |
peace13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 05:15 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Who's to say who is viable? |
|
My guy isn't on your list.
|
jefferson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. Anything less than single digits in the national polls indicates no viability...in my view. |
|
Next time i'll toss Tancredo in there so you can vote for "your guy".
|
peace13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
13. Didn't know Tancredo but 'the google' caught me up on him. |
|
Nice talk here. Free thinking is not synonymies with DU. I must repeat...Hillary is the girl for me...Hillary is the girl for me. Peace, Kim
|
incapsulated
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 05:15 PM
Response to Original message |
racaulk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 05:30 PM
Original message |
Always looking for opportunities to post this... |
incapsulated
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 05:30 PM
Response to Original message |
TwilightZone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 05:18 PM
Response to Original message |
6. That guy from "War Games" seems to do the worst in head-to-head polls. |
|
Though, in fairness, he just got into the race, so who knows....
|
IndianaGreen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 05:21 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Tough poll. Any Democrat can beat any Republican in 2008. |
|
You don't have the racist Tancredo, who I think will give us a landslide against him.
|
AtomicKitten
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 05:21 PM
Response to Original message |
8. With a plethora of losers to choose from, I can't decide. |
smalll
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 05:26 PM
Response to Original message |
9. McLame or Grandpa Fred - |
|
then it will be a re-run of the 96 election - a Clinton against a tired old man. If somehow Edwards gets our nom, I'd like to see Mittens though. A battle of the used-car salesmen would be amusing.
|
jefferson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. LOL! Literally. Good post! |
dmallind
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 06:13 PM
Response to Original message |
12. C'mon we have heard the fundies.... |
|
Edited on Tue Oct-09-07 06:14 PM by dmallind
....how can you want anyone other than pro choilife drag queen Giuliani? I mean if the economic conservatives have some second thoughts about massive government spending and the rapture-ready wackjobs won't support anyone who doesn't promise public executions for abortion providers and gays, who is left? millionaires, Idaho, Utah and Nebraska? Not enough!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 08th 2024, 08:49 PM
Response to Original message |