Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Congressional Fashion Statement: New lapel pin makes a Constitutional point

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 09:33 AM
Original message
Congressional Fashion Statement: New lapel pin makes a Constitutional point
NYT: October 10, 2007,
Congressional Fashion Statement
By David M. Herszenhorn

WASHINGTON, Oct. 10 – The way Representative John Yarmuth of Kentucky sees it, lawmakers on Capitol Hill and Americans everywhere have forgotten who the Founding Fathers really intended to run the country –- not the President who was more of a Constitutional after-thought but the Congress, the people’s elected representatives.

Mr. Yarmuth said he and many of the 41 other freshman Democrats in the House had been puzzling for some time over just how to remind voters of this, how to mold a most basic lesson of American civics so that it could be carried far and wide by the modern techniques of political messaging. And then an idea struck.

Today, on the House floor, Mr. Yarmuth began distributing small buttons, seemingly made of parchment, with the words, “Article 1” – as in Article 1 of the Constitution, which states, “All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.” In other words: Mr. President, the Congress would like to remind you, that you, dear pal, are Article 2.

Mr. Yarmuth said that about 50 lawmakers, most of them fellow freshmen, had quickly snapped up the pins. Two Republicans, suspicious perhaps, of a Democrat bearing gifts, politely declined, though Mr. Yarmuth said that he was hoping to recruit Representative Ron Paul, the Texas Republican, strict constitutionalist and candidate for president, to distribute the pins to fellow members of the G.O.P....

***

“It came out of thinking about why we were all elected last year,” Mr. Yarmouth said. “The war had a lot to do with it but another, I think equally important factor was the sense that the people’s voice was not being heard in deliberations of government, that the presidency had gotten much too powerful and arrogant, with executive privilege cliams and signing statements and a wide range of things like that. He added: “The American people wanted to push back against the imperial presidency.”...

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/10/10/congressional-fashion-statement-were-article-1/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. I like it and hope to hell they replace those stupid flag pins!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. Congressional power has eroded since about 1950-----once given away, it is seldome retrieved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. Kudos to Rep. Yarmuth
I wish he was my rep; I'm stuck with Chimpolini apologist extraordinaire Ron Lewis.

I hope this is able to overcome corporate media roadblocks and gain traction far & wide.

I'll see your jingoistic lapel pin and raise you a living document!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. OK lets see if the lapel pin flag guys wear it.
Probably not, they don't believe in the Constitution, unless they find something "that puts it in their pockets." You know what I mean...money money money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
5. They might also remind people of the Oath of Office...
wherein they swear to "Protect and Defend the Constitution" not land, corporate profits, or political offices, or even the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KKKarl is an idiot Donating Member (662 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
6. But but ...wait a moment
What about the terrorists? Who will defend us but our George. Surely not those defeatist congressional democrats. After all the people did not know what they were voting for. Lets blame it on those pesky women voters. They should not be allowed to vote. Well maybe we should give the vote to white men only because even if they are evil they are not Muslims.

Ok I concede

argument lost: White men wrote the constitution

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
7. IMO, I see no problem with congress yielding power to an executive, however
The problem lies in the fact that in order to take that power back they need to pass another law or resolution which is subject to the President's veto, meaning that the President has to give the power back. Congress needs to be able to take any power back from an executive that they grant him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC