LoZoccolo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-11-07 10:50 PM
Original message |
Does anybody remember when "30 strikes and you're out" was instituted during last primaries? |
jkshaw
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-11-07 11:20 PM
Response to Original message |
DemocratSinceBirth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-11-07 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. I Think It Had To Do With Thirty Warnings |
|
Was it thirty deleted posts or actual warning?
I've had deleted posts but never actual warnings...
|
LoZoccolo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-11-07 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. Thirty deleted posts, but each one would give you a warning. |
|
If you got five warnings you'd be suspended for some time, but I don't think it was more than 1-3 days.
There were special primary rules too.
|
DemocratSinceBirth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-11-07 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
I think I got one warning and you couldn't log in to you read the rules...
The problem is so many original titles are pure flamebait...
I'll bet there's a dozen on the page right now...
|
paulk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-11-07 11:26 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I thought it was a good idea.
|
DemocratSinceBirth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-11-07 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
Thirty actual warnings
or thirty deleted messages?
|
paulk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-12-07 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
10. I don't remember the exact mechanism, to be honest |
|
it wasn't real punative, but it did help cut down of some of the over the top stuff.
DU is a business, after all, and I suppose the admin didn't want to run of all it's customers.
|
Kurt_and_Hunter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-11-07 11:49 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Maybe I've just become a nervous wreck in the interim, but I recall 2004 as being |
|
Edited on Thu Oct-11-07 11:51 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
pretty high-minded. There were some self-righteous Deaniacs and some Dean-assassination, and a big jovial Clark contingent, and painfully sincere Edwards folks but it seemed like a student council election to me... just gainsaying the other guy, but with no sense of schism. I frequently felt vicarious pride at the fighting spirit.
The greater stakes were always in view. I can't imagine many folks in 2004 ever suggested one ought not to vote against Bush.
Today, I get the sense that a lot of people do not really feel the implications of a republican win in 2008. I fear that after seven long years that many right-thinking folks have become dependent on a republican president as a constant defining term in their moral sensibilities. If you were 16 in 2000 it's been quite a period to begin defining one's self. The fervor for perfection of worship over winning is like the way no religion expects to actually defeat the devil.
|
jmp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-12-07 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. I'm more worried about BECOMING the devil. (nm) |
LoZoccolo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-12-07 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:39 PM
Response to Original message |