Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iowa voter Tod Bowman wants to tell you something.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 08:43 PM
Original message
Iowa voter Tod Bowman wants to tell you something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. A plan for fixing social security fairly AND a call for fiscal responsibility.
Gee, I thought we had to choose one or the other according to Hillary!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. After 98 thousand, Buffet did not have to pay anything! How screwed is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mother Of Four Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
4. Finally....
A real answer. My husband is 49, I'm 37. Fortunately we are both healthy but his age is rapidly approaching that 63 and 1/3 mark.

Raiding social security to balance the budget is robbing Peter to pay Paul, and while Paul gets richer Peter ends up eating Alpo over toast.

It's a crying shame.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
5. Yep.
Some initial amount of income should be exempted, then the cap raised or eliminated.

The reason for the cap initially (as I understand it) was to create a simple program that wasn't a blatant redistribution of income. If you eliminate the cap completely, it becomes redistribution. I don't necessarily think that's a bad thing, but it's more troublesome politically. OTOH, it should be possible to make a case for raising the cap to keep the program solvent. In fact as far as I can see, that is the only "solution" that is in keeping with the program's initial intention. Anything else is a design change. A design change isn't necessarily a bad thing, but we should see it for what it is.

I like that Obama isn't afraid to address this issue rationally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
6. Obama trying to solve a problem that isn't there, is being played by anti-FDR wing of the GOP. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Wrong. There is a problem, and it needs to be solved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. What problem, funded thru 2030/40, depending on the beankeeper. No oil is problem. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phen43 Donating Member (223 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
9. Excellent video!!!!
Say it like it is Todd Bowman!!!:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phen43 Donating Member (223 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
10. GO OBAMA GO!!!
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phen43 Donating Member (223 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
11. KICK!!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC