Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The question is "How big will the neo-con a##-kicking be?"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 03:57 AM
Original message
The question is "How big will the neo-con a##-kicking be?"
Enough of these "(Your Name Here) CANNOT WIN!" It's all horseshit the corporate media is trying desperately to make you believe.

Have you looked at the news the last few days? We gotta draft coming. 6/15/05. The first ones to be drafted would be those in high need technical areas. Young Professionals. Computer programmers. Medical Professionals. Engineers. Linguists.

Now, where do those people come from? They are the children of the elite of this country.

If someone tries to drag the children of the elite to Iraq, I guarantee you Shrub would be tossed over a railing and Alan Greenspan would personally get on his knees and crawl to Pennsylvania Ave. to give Carol Mosely-Braun her first tour of the White House as President-elect.

I'm not kidding here, folks. There some dynamic in play that's beyond me, but these stupid neo-cons are now playing a game with the real power in this country. There are NO deferments. The children of the elite will be the ones going off to Iraq in the largest percentages. That's simply not going to be allowed to happen. Look at Anthony Zinni. The Dems will be getting the uniformed military this election. WHEN has THAT ever happened?

Then there's the food supply. Mad Cow. It's what's for dinner. Cattle country is now crossed off the GOP map.

So enough of these cannibal threads. We've got to stop eating our own. Let's get back to calmly discussing candidate positions, and quit feeding the far-right's need to watch us kill each other.

The question isn't whether any of our candidate can win. The question IS how much they will win by.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 04:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. It will be delightful if the beef industry blames Bush
For giving them exactly what they wanted.

A good leader would have given them what they needed to be unassailably secure. Now it's going to cost all of us to clean up the mess.

A corporation that declares a profit that debits the nation is a parasite, and will eventually the destroy the nation from which it leeches.

Come on, aren't we all willing to kick in a few bucks for the bad beef boys?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 04:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. the X cant win
statements are overstated

it's never been that X can't win, it's what are X's chances. Before today, Seattle probably wasnt looking too good about going to the playoffs... nor was Green Bay until that last second catch in AZ. Anything can happen...

But I think a lot of people hate Bush SO much they want to feel we should be doing our absolute best to take him out. They dont feel Dallas is as good a team as, say, New England. I can think they're wrong without hating Dallas...

Make the positive case - why candidate X is as good a candidate, address the expressed concerns in a positive manner, and you'd likely put some of it to rest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyorDeath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 04:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. So true
"Enough of these "(Your Name Here) CANNOT WIN!" It's all horse shit the corporate media is trying desperately to make you believe."

and isn't it amazing how many people give a shit what the media says.

The only poll that counts is on voting day and the only media that matters is the word on the street.

The rethugs are nervous and are using all there pass go and get out of jail free cards with the media but every one who voted Gore in 2000 will vote Dem and not everyone who voted bush will vote for this lying sack of shit a second time around.

This leaves Rove sweating like the pig he is.

All the $ in the world can't buy * a brain.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 04:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. You'd think the GOP wouldn't be so worried with congress to fall back on
But in reality they need the White House for one reason, the Justice Department. Without it, all of the corporate criminals will actually be caught.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 04:39 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. *GRIN*
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 04:18 AM
Response to Original message
4. well, if you have a lick of sense, you'd better be worried
for the next ten months
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 04:23 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. We're kinda locked into the current reality until after election
We'll fix what we can, but there a certain amount of neo-con crap we're still stuck with until we can boot them out constitutionally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 04:29 AM
Response to Original message
6. Don't bother blaming mad cow on Bush...
Because the neocons will find a way to say that madcow takes a certain amount of time to spread therefore it was Clinton's fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 04:35 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Doesn't matter... testing was abysmal. Bush to blame for that
They can say whatever they like. The testing program was so abysmal there is no way they have the data to prove their charges.

Dumbya could have changed the testing procedures and didn't. Without testing data, they can't make those claims. Well, they'll try to make stuff up, but it will be easy for us to disprove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #8
20. and all will believe just what they want,
We have reached this stage,No truth, we will make it up to fit the answers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moz4prez Donating Member (591 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 04:44 AM
Response to Original message
10. Mark Twain never lost a nickel underestimating the intelligence of the
American public.

Similarly, no one's ever lessened his chances by overestimating the enemy.

you have to be prepared for any development. you shouldn't forget that we're running against a wartime incumbent, one who isn't exactly a champion of transparency in government. anything can happen!

foolish optimism is the LAST thing we should adopt right now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 04:48 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Ain't nothin' foolish about it.
The minute people realize Dumbya is gonna be dragging their kids out of the computer labs at Stanford, Dumbya is gonna get dumped as the favorite over-achiever of the filthy rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moz4prez Donating Member (591 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 04:56 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. if it isn't foolish, it's certainly optimistic
Edited on Mon Dec-29-03 04:56 AM by moz4prez
last time I perused the wires, there was no draft panic.

didn't you hear that Bush intends to begin withdrawing troops from Iraq starting by June? This administration knows what's politically expedient, if nothing else.

do you think the members of the House and Senate would ratify a draft? would they hurl THEIR children into shark-infested waters? Rep. Charlie Rangel (NY-D) proposed a draft about a year ago, and it was enthusiastically shot down.

edit: diction
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 05:04 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. It will pass by voice vote in lame duck session after election
No record will be taken on the bill so nobody can be held responsible. They seem to be getting good at passing bills that change the whole government chaotically overnight by voice vote.

Meanwhile, all Dumbya has to do is sign an executive order to get the process prepared
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moz4prez Donating Member (591 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 05:15 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. And why should the American upper-crust crumble under this possibility?
the wealthy have no trouble working loopholes to their advantage, simply because they can AFFORD to. ultimately, it's the dregs of society, the human debris, and the vast, amorphous middle class who will suffer the most.

no offense, but I just think you're pulling a lot of these ideas out of thin air.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melodybe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 05:21 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Kick for this thread! Everyword is so true!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 05:28 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Not when the high-need professionals are getting drafted first
They can't get "dregs" to act as doctors, nurses, engineers, and programmers.

Those are the educated. The educated youth are the children of the elite.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moz4prez Donating Member (591 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 05:43 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. since when were doctors, engineers, and programmers
members of the "elite"? is the only imperative to power an education? upward social mobility? come on. the middle/upper-middle classes don't run the country (insofar as puppeteering goes), and besides, they generally vote Republican. what's going to dissuade them? the liberal media?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonoboy Donating Member (759 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 05:34 AM
Response to Original message
17. yep your right..draft is a big no no
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
19. bravo!
the ''i hate your candidate'' threads are so boring.
amd it's what i hate more than anything else about this years primaries -- arguing about anything except bush.
no body pisses and moans about dem establishment than i do.
but -- early on in the primary season i loved what all the candidates had to say about bush and the direction of the country -- and even though some of them voted for things i hated -- i believed a message had gotten through.
now though dems and assorted and sundry liberals have turned on each other and it's just fucking boring. nobody says anything new -- it's not really about ideas just cowering about what bush/rove is gonna do.
we're even seeing threads about angry white men again and how they'll vote -- who the fuck cares?!? it's about ideas -- good liberal ideas that fight for the common man -- whether he/she likes us or not.
it's about what liberals know to be the truth in their bones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
21. locked
please refrain from using profanity in the first post of a new thread. Feel free to repost this with swears expunged.

Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC