Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Looks like Nader is going to run. Will announce on Meet the Press

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Monument Donating Member (165 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 01:27 PM
Original message
Looks like Nader is going to run. Will announce on Meet the Press
Remember when Arnold announced his candidacy on Leno? Well, you don't schedule a TV appearance to announce that you are NOT going to run. Nader will run for President. Mark my words.

Here's an article from today's NY Times.

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/national/AP-Nader.html?hp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Viking12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. What an asshole n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monument Donating Member (165 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I'm an ahole? Or Nader's an ahole?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. Nader.
clearly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viking12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. Nader
Sorry for the confusion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
absyntheNsugar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
45. Nader
Nader has no respect from me at all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StopTheMorans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. hope there's enough space in the room for some reporters to cover
it; with Nader's head being so large tho, who knows :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. What a self-centered SOB. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. My prediction on his platform
The Iraq war was wrong and you have a choice between two people who were in favor of that wrong war.

I'm even more convinced that the democratic nominee is doomed to lose this year if for no other reason than the Iraq war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snivi Yllom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. that is a very sane prediction
I also predict that 'special interests' will be an issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peachhead22 Donating Member (798 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. Nader is...
...looking more and more like Lyndon Larouche.

(Not in his politics, mind you, but on his increasingly tenuous grip on reality)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monument Donating Member (165 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Nader won't be with the Greens, he'll be an independent
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. Someone bribe this son of a bitch...
with a cabinet position. Give him the EPA. That would do a hell of a lot more to advance him and his party. The stakes are too high to play this bullshit game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Claire Beth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I agree! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monument Donating Member (165 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. We'll soon see what kind of a man he is
Was his run in 2000 just to set him up for a political windfall in 2004?

His candidacy cost the Democrats the race.

Might he expect the Dems to pay him handsomely to not run?

Was this his plan all along?

Needless to say, he'll be asking for, and most likely receiving, the world from the potential candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. yup four more years of Bush,
sounds like a plan. Used to respect Ralph, and often have agreed with what he says, but he needs to take his head out of .... hmmmm.... the clouds... or other location.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Desertrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. I think we are giving Ralph too much credit....
Edited on Fri Feb-20-04 01:47 PM by Desertrose
with out the Greens...how far will he get I wonder......

I think not too far.....

Now if the Dems would just offer someone who can bring in the Greens & Indys...oh wait...how 'bout Dennis Kucinich...Nader said he'd not run if DK was the nominee.....(on edit-probably because he knew he wouldn't have any votes if he ran against Dennis)....

:shakinghead icon:

Peace
DR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
26. Nah. Time for.....Math! With! Ralph!
The nader factor= the 2.7 percent that voted for him last time minus the huge number who now know the indistinguishable schtick was utter BS minus the huge number of nader voters who live in state's we'll win by a wide margin minus the smaller number who live in state's we'll lose handily minus the nader voters who would never vote dem anyway.

The result is a miniscule number of votes.

Sure, if the FL fiasco is repeated, anyone, even the LaRouche or the World Socialist Ice Fishermen's Party, could make a difference--but the ods are slim.

Nader's running is great news folks. He's not going to hurt us, and we get to destroy him along the way. C'mon Ralph. Don't go wobbly on us. RUUUUUUUUUUUUUNNNNNNN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
34. Someone already DID bribe him
Karl Rove
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
12. Let me guess, he wan'ts to "teach Democrats a lesson?"
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
14. He's running because he wants to keep his Bush tax cut
The rest of us of course have to live with the consequences of a second--and more destructive--Bush Administration.

Nader voters: if your guy swings another election to Bush I'll be standing right there to say "See I told you so", as you or your kids are packed up and conscripted into George W. Bush's Army in 2005.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #14
42. "Kids packed up"?The conscripts for Bush's PNAC army will be Nader voters.
Edited on Fri Feb-20-04 03:18 PM by oasis
The armed services are hurting for recruits now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
16. Rove's 'February Surprise'. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iverson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
17. Look! There goes a UFO!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
20. You know, I don't give a rat's ass if he runs
He won't get anywhere near the vote he did in 2000, and that was, what, 3 percent? Plus, I've decided I'm not going to worry about things I can't control. Nader or not, I believe we have a very good shot at recapturing the presidency in 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. I'd KILL for that 3% back!
3% in Florida and a lot of other states swing the entire election to Gore!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
21. Sweeeeeeet!!!!
I hope the Dems have the press kit ready to go. Wal-Mart, Viacom, and Merk profiteering. Union busting. "Indistinguishable" statements. Financial secrecy. Megalomania.

It's sweet revenge time folks, and Ralph has provided us the sugar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
22. I agree
I have always thought Nader would run unless we nominate Dennis John Kucinich. Stop Nader by voting Kucinich!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
West Coast Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
23. Plenty of DUers say they would support
a third party candidate if Kerry or Edwards or whomever got the nomination.

Well, I'm not wealthy enough to vote Green. I have to live in the real world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mot78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Nader's not running as a Green
He's running as an Independent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
West Coast Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. What difference does it make?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. Nader is the 'expert' on "differences".
Just note his fine comparison of Gore and Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
West Coast Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Exactly!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onecitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
29. Just heard breaking news on Faux.......
he's IN!!

I am blowing a gasket right now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudnclear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #29
50. If Nader is in, the Dems are out BUT
Nader being in could hurt Bush this time around...all those Independents who held their noses and voted for Bush might just go for Nader.

I really think that Bush should remain in office until he kills off the Republican party for good. The next four years will be hell for whoever wins the election. And the neocons have so much money, power, and influence they would ruin any Dem in the WH. Unless and until the American public wakes up to what is happening to their country and choses someone who can take a principled stand against sleazeball corporate executives, blindly supporting Israel no matter what Israel does, huge tax loopholes and benefits for the very people who don't need it...the top 2%, and face down the military hype and the perpetual war machine that we have created, and fights to build up and retain jobs in this country, unless that happens, we may as well get used to more of the same and live our lives just as the Israqis did under Saddam...maintain a low profile, work, love and take care of your family, and kiss Bush's ass when he asks you to...then you will be safe...maybe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sleipnir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
31. I for one, HOPE he does run!
Then he can be finally marginalized when he gets like .05% of the popular vote! It will be the final death knell for his political aspirations!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nadienne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
32. Ignore me, please.
Edited on Fri Feb-20-04 02:09 PM by Nadienne
(self-delete)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
33. Sure! It's a warning shot across the bow. Too few people have been smart
enough to support DK so far, and he said long ago that unless DK's the nominee, there'll be at least 3 contenders in November.

We can still fix the problem. Only 25% of votes have been cast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snivi Yllom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. To be honest, Nader's timing sucks
If he really wanted to ensure a more progressive candidate would get the nomination he should have announced this back in December before the first primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. That's true...like the Doomsday machine in "Dr. Strangelove"
The effectiveness is lost unless there is sufficient prior warning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #36
41. He said last July he would likely run if Kucinich was not nominee.
There is no suprise here. The only surprise in the offing would be if we make Kucinich our nominee. Then Nader would not run and would likely actively campaign on behalf of Kucinich presidency. Running a progressive Green Democrat is the only way to shut down Nader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #33
40. yes, likely Nader run is no suprise
But its not to late to make Kucinich our nominee!
Otherwise, democrats will be fighting uphill battle IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
35. Criminal Codes Prohibit Me
From suggesting the proper way of dealing with this agent provocatuer and arch-fiend of splinterism....

"There will be a holiday in our street soon!"

"LET'S GO GET THOSE BUSH BASTARDS!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #35
54. If that's true, then you're no democrat and don't deserve
the handle you chose.

Killing people who displease you is the act of a tyrant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasSissy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
37. Will his head fit thru the door there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
38. IOW, Dems can't win unless we prevent someone else from running?
Edited on Fri Feb-20-04 02:50 PM by Tinoire
Is that the new name of the game? Trying to hold people's votes hostage? Maintaining the illusion that they have a choice without really giving them one?

Kind of sad that despite the hatred of Bush, Democrats don't think we can win unless we prevent someone else from running. That right there tells you something about the candidates the DNC & DLC are foisting on the public.

Wow.

---

Not directed at the original poster but at anyone who prefers to think that Nader is the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monument Donating Member (165 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #38
43. Should Nader participate in the debates?
just checking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #43
46. I think he should.
We'll see Bush and whomever tripping all over themselves to see who can sound the most populist if Nader's in the debates and maybe we could get to real issues instead of skirting around really important ones.

Real issues such as the coming occupation of Iraq. War & war-enabling. NAFTA. WTO. Corporate globalization. Water & utility privatization that we're pushing all over the world. Genetically modified foods. A bloated defense budget. The space wars we are already having with the Europeans. The bi-partisan support of some of the most corrupt regimes in Central/Latin America & the Middle-East as well as our bi-partisan persecution of the populist Leftist ones. Israel/Palestine. Bi-partisan support for the erosion of civil liberties in this country. Terrorism being used as an excuse to go into other countries when we need to keep them in line.

Real issues that unfortunately matter to an awful lot of voters who spent a long three years thinking about "Why do they hate us?".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #43
55. I think he should too, in the open debates
Longtime national figure, large following, not a crook or nutcase, eligible for the office....yes, I think he should. Not in the current Dem primary debates, since he's not standing for the Dem nomination, but in the later ones? You betcha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turkw Donating Member (521 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #38
53. It's not that we don't think we can win, it's that we know we might not
win, if in just a few important states, a few hundred people vote for Nader rather than the Democrat. If it were John McCain, I would not care, if it were a number of other Republicans, I would care, but not to the point of changing my opinion of Nader. Bush is another story, this presidency is unlike anything we have ever seen.

As mad as I am about the primaries and the media, I will put the Democratic nominee's bumper sticker on my car and vote for him. If it were another Republican, I might even vote FOR Nader. I will not take that chance, I didn't in 2000 and I was right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IconoclastIlene Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
44. This guy is immortal....
Me and my husband were talking....we arent' youngsters, baby boomers in the middle of the boom, and we can hardly remember a time without Ralph Nader.

Hehas been around since we were at least 10..just HOW old is this guy? Maybe we need age caps on presidential nominees...the has to be 75....which is fine...maybe I could get good medical care like seems to have for myself...Hey, Ralph, who pays for your doctor bills?

Hey..Ralph....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tedoll78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
47. I hate to say this..
but when he retires from politics, be it either by just being tired of it or by his own death, I'm gonna dance like crazy in celebration. The man is doing nothing but harm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. Can I join you?
I will too. He was great as a consumer advocate, and I won't deny that he made strides in consumer protection, but he will NOT be able to advance his issues by helping Bush be elected another 4 years. Quite the opposite....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tedoll78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. Yup!
It'll be the Nader Retirement Dance Party! BYOB! :party:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turkw Donating Member (521 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #47
52. For all the good he has done, and how much he says IS rigtht, this is NOT
I hope he does not run, it will hurt the country and damage his reputation beyond repair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftPeopleFinishFirst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
51. gah.
Better get used to four more bush years
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC