NYT quoted only Republicans in support of claim that Democrats "fear...sharing ticket" with Clinton

[DeepModem Mom]

Media Matters for America: NY Times article quoted only Republicans in support of claim that Democrats "fear ... sharing the ticket" with Clinton

In a December 4 front-page New York Times article, staff writer Carl Hulse asserted that "the possibility" that Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) will be the Democratic presidential nominee "is already generating concern among some Democrats in Republican-leaning states and Congressional districts, who fear that sharing the ticket with her could subject them to attack as too liberal and out of step with the values of their constituents" and reported that "House Democrats do not like to discuss the idea of reverse coattails for fear of giving it too much credence and angering the Clinton camp." However, while Hulse quoted several Republicans supporting the theory that Democrats have something to "fear" from Clinton becoming the party's nominee, he quoted no Democrats, by name or anonymously, who said they "fear ... sharing the ticket" with Clinton.

In his article, headlined "Vulnerable Democrats See Fates Tied to Clinton," Hulse quoted only three Democrats: Reps. Nancy Boyda (KS) and Chris Van Hollen (MD), chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, and Clinton communications director Howard Wolfson. However, none as quoted supported Hulse's assertion that "some Democrats in Republican-leaning states and Congressional districts ... fear ... sharing the ticket" with Clinton. From the article:

"Ms. Boyda, who is trying to establish a political identity as independent, said her intent was simply to show the voters of both parties in her district that she was delivering for them. Of the presidential race, she said: 'It is something I have no control over, quite honestly. They will demonize any Democrat who becomes the nominee. I just put my head down and work.' She said she was putting her faith in Kansans' willingness to split tickets. 'Kansans are very practical people,' she said. 'They just want people who will get the job done.'...

"Representative Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, says incumbent Democrats in generally Republican districts proved very capable of holding on in the last presidential election. He says the national race gives House candidates a chance to emphasize their independence by breaking with the presidential nominee when they differ. 'This is an opportunity to distinguish themselves on the issues from whoever the nominee is,' Mr. Van Hollen said. 'If they approach it right and tell their constituents where they stand, it enhances their credibility and independence.'"

By contrast, Hulse quoted two Republicans asserting that Clinton would hurt Boyda's chances of re-election if she were the Democratic nominee: Patrick Leopold, campaign manager for Kansas state treasurer Lynn Jenkins, who is running against Boyda, and Pottawatomie County Commissioner Tom Doperalski. But while Doperalski stated that "(t)he people I talk to, they just cannot imagine a worse scenario" for Boyda than having Clinton as the Democratic nominee, Hulse also reported that Doperalski "says any antipathy toward Mrs. Clinton will not necessarily mean enmity toward Ms. Boyda."...

http://www.mediamatters.org/items/200712040008?f=h_latest

Contact information:

The New York Times
Clark Hoyt, NY Times public editor
[e-mail]
New York Times
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

When contacting the media, please be polite and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and be sure to indicate exactly what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.

[countmyvote4real]

1. She's not my first choice for POTUS.

I'm a Democrat and I approved this message.

[Tactical Progressive]

2. Well, who would know better?

what Democrats are thinking, than Publicans?

Just more proof that the mainstream media have become Republicans. Not the seething ultra-right wingers that control Congress kind of Publicans, just regular old-fashioned right-wingers.

They should be ashamed of themselves, but you need some honor for that.

[Beacool]

3. Campaign Diaries refutes the NYT's assertions

Please read the article:

http://www.campaigndiaries.com/2007/12/new-york-times-charges-again-that.html

[Perry Logan]

4. This is the same dumb argument the anti-Hillarites have repeated a million times.

[BootinUp]

5. There probably are a couple Democrats he could have quoted

Obama and Edwards, lol.