kentuck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-08-07 08:18 AM
Original message |
Why did the CIA destroy the tapes?? |
|
They knew it was illegal to destroy them. Yet, they were willing to suffer the consequences of that rather than make them public. What could have been so horrible that they were willing to destroy evidence requested by the 9/11 Commission as well as the defense for Jose Padilla, the terrorist that was convicted and sentenced to life in prison? Who made the decision to destroy these tapes? Of course, the President only found out about it last week.
The most disturbing point in this whole matter is the total nonchalance and disregard with which the Republicans in the House and Senate look at this issue. What would it take for them to put their country and our laws above their Party and their leader? How much more proof do they need? Is it any wonder Americans have lost hope in our nation? The Republican Party is acting like an enemy of the people. Let them get together with the Democrats and get to the bottom of this. Are they afraid of the truth?
|
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-08-07 08:22 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Rec'd. What would it take for them to put their country and our laws above their Party and leader? |
|
THAT is the question, and no answer looks good.
|
thepurpose
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-08-07 08:25 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Do you think the Democrats will push for the truth? I predict that in a few weeks |
|
the MSM will join forces with the GOP and tell us how this is no big deal and to move on. The democrats will cave because they can't get 60 votes to do anything in the senate. I do have faith that the house will put up a better fight, but not without some weasles attempting to sink their efforts. I hate to feel this way, but time and time again we are seeing the same results. Nothing.
|
flyarm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-08-07 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
8. no...evidence of that..they have not called Sibel Edmonds to testify or for a hearing. eom |
MannyGoldstein
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-08-07 08:27 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Obviously they were tapes of torture. That's why the CIA lied to the 9/11 Commission by saying they did not have these tapes, and that's why they were destroyed. No other reasonable explanation fits. Certainly not "protecting identities" - that's utter bullshit - faces could have been blacked out.
|
flyarm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-08-07 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
10. because al queada was tied directly to Saudi's..and then Bushco could not have started their war |
|
Edited on Sat Dec-08-07 08:56 AM by flyarm
with Iraq!
The prisoner implicated the newphew of the king of saudi..
no where was Iraq even mentioned..and the PNAC power grab was a go ..to attack Iraq..the pnac boys had to stay on script..
they were doing the two step with ..iraq-9/11...they were piddling the two in the same puddle.
they couldn't have Saudi brought into it..and ruin the script.
and remember at that point they were still lying about flying Osama's family and saudi's out of the states while the US airspace was shut down...
fly
|
MADem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-08-07 08:59 AM
Original message |
Quack Quack!! If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, that's probably what is is! |
|
A tape of torturing ducks....
|
MADem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-08-07 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
12. ... doubleclick... sorry. nt |
|
Edited on Sat Dec-08-07 09:00 AM by MADem
|
tecelote
(645 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-08-07 08:37 AM
Response to Original message |
The Backlash Cometh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-08-07 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
The prisoner was not tortured. He talked willingly. He said that there were three Saudi's and one Pakistani who knew that the US was planning a 9/11 attack (presumably on their own country). The four have since died. Two of them were Saudi princes.
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
|
kentuck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-08-07 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
Lerkfish
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-08-07 08:42 AM
Response to Original message |
6. IIRCl sy hersh stating that the tapes contained gang raping of young sons |
|
in front of their fathers to make them talk.
If I"m wrong on that remembered detail, I'm sure it has to be something more horrific than the photos we've already seen, which are plenty horrific.
|
flyarm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-08-07 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
11. actually i believe it was their mothers...eom |
Lerkfish
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-08-07 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
14. ok, thanks, I knew it was torture by proxy. |
|
less sure of the details.
|
flyarm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-08-07 08:49 AM
Response to Original message |
7. 2FAA officers destroyed tapes made the morn of 9/11 of the ATC that controlled the planes.... |
|
destroying evidence of airline crashes for 5 years is a federal offence..those FAA officers were promoted not jailed..as they should have been!
And they were never questioned under oath by the 9/11 commission..nor were the ATC controllers who were on those tapes.
So when people turn their nose up and say ..you are a conspiracy theorist about 9/11..if they believe the * bullshit..they are the real conspiracy theorists!
the Official story is a conspiracy theory.
in fact it is a fantasy.
fly
|
screembloodymurder
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-08-07 09:28 AM
Response to Original message |
13. Because they believe they are above the law. |
|
Why did they kill Kennedy?
|
flyarm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-08-07 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
15. they don't just believe it..they are........has anyone gone to jail? nope! |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:07 PM
Response to Original message |