ShaneGR
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-22-04 03:17 PM
Original message |
| If the Democrats nominated Jesus Christ or Ghandi |
|
Ralph Nader would still say there is no difference between Jesus or Ghandi and Bush.
The truth about Nader has become crystal clear, he wants GWB re-elected.
|
| BootinUp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-22-04 03:22 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I am no Nader lover, but I don't think if you plugged him into a lie detector that it would have been flucuating off the paper this morning on MTP. Nader wants to damage the democratic party, no question there. If that means 8 years of Bush jr. then so be it.
|
| ShaneGR
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-22-04 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 4. I think it has more to do with Republican loving |
|
Yes, he wants to damage the Dem party. But I don't think it has anything to do with some crazy scheme for 3rd party dominance. I think he actually likes Bush.
|
| RandomKoolzip
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-22-04 03:22 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. The rumors that his campaign is being fianced by the RNC are still |
|
Edited on Sun Feb-22-04 03:23 PM by RandomKoolzip
flying around too. While I wouldn't care to get really far-flung about it, I belive those rumors....I was stupid enough to get duped into voting for this prick in 2000. Regrets? I've had a few. No more third party egotism!
Third Party = Republican Party
|
| H2O Man
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-22-04 03:23 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Your message is correct. Nader is an ill wind which blows no good in 2004.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:16 AM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
