ringmastery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-22-04 03:20 PM
Original message |
People make too much of Nader - ignore him |
|
Don't feed the attention whore.
|
tobius
(947 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-22-04 03:25 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Good idea- allthese posts about Nader just give him more publicity |
|
Edited on Sun Feb-22-04 04:12 PM by tobius
edited to make clear that this is sarcasm</sigh>
|
Nicholas D Wolfwood
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-22-04 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. It's hard to ignore him |
|
When he's allowed the seed of all that is evil to take root in our White House.
|
dave29
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-22-04 03:37 PM
Response to Original message |
OneBlueSky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-22-04 05:11 PM
Response to Original message |
4. prediction: Nader's vote total will be so low . . . |
|
that whatever credibility he has left (ain't much) will be demolished . . . he probably won't even get on the ballot in more than a handful of states . . . from Bush fatigue to Bush rage, people are determined to send the pretender packing in November, and only a few misguided fools will waste their votes on the likes of Ralph Nader . . . he's a non-issue, imo . . .
|
Timefortruth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-22-04 05:14 PM
Response to Original message |
5. It is clear to me that the Nader stuff is just to stir things up. |
|
When the 2004 rules kick in they will be gone forever.
Until then it is a safe way to flame without any repercussions.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 10th 2024, 06:45 PM
Response to Original message |