Should people who admit to helping Nader get ballot access be tombstoned?

[ButterflyBlood]

what if someone makes a post saying they are collecting signatures to get on the ballot in their state and want to collect some here. Should that be allowed?

[bushwakker]

1. yes*

[nothingshocksmeanymore]

2. They would be wiser to support the more purist superior candidate

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=380925

[Walt Starr]

3. I won't collect signatures

but I'll definitely sign if presented one.

I sign every petition handed to me to get any candidate or issue on a ballot. I have done so for as long as I've been a registered voter and will not stop now.

[illumn8d]

5. Agreed

[Democat]

4. There is very little difference between Bush and Nader supporters

They are both working to get Bush elected.

[MoonAndSun]

6. Another "let's purge them" post?

According to DU rules, ntil the convention, when the nominee is finally appointed, then anyone can post about Nader, good or bad, if they want to.

After the nominee is picked, then those types of posts must stop. What is so hard to understand about that?