JohnLocke
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-22-04 05:53 PM
Original message |
Poll question: Would you make this deal with Ralph Nader? |
|
Edited on Sun Feb-22-04 05:56 PM by JohnLocke
If Ralph Nader offered to drop his presidential run in exchange for the position of Sec. of the Interior (or EPA chief, whatever) would you accept it?
|
MurikanDemocrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-22-04 05:54 PM
Response to Original message |
|
NEVER deal with terrorists!
|
JohnLocke
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-22-04 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
MurikanDemocrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-22-04 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
mdmc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-22-04 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. Better to run v. Nader than make a deal |
JohnLocke
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-22-04 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. A terrorist, by definition, uses violence to accomplish his or her goals. |
foo_bar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-22-04 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
9. nader isn't a terrorist |
|
but you still don't want to encourage him.
|
JohnLocke
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-22-04 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
Darranar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-22-04 06:00 PM
Response to Original message |
JohnLocke
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-22-04 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. For once, Darranar, we agree. |
Piperay
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-22-04 06:04 PM
Response to Original message |
7. NO, nader missed his opportunity for |
|
something like that, should have been BEFORE he decided to run. Anyway I don't think he is going to be of that much importance, too many people remember how voting for him influenced the last election.
|
JHBowden
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-22-04 07:39 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Republican plants in the administration? |
jpgray
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-22-04 09:32 PM
Response to Original message |
12. No. Nader is a wretch who makes money condemning other wretches. (nt) |
mlawson
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-22-04 09:36 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Conditionally. Two things: |
|
1) It absolutely MUST be kept secret. If Ralph lets it slip, EVER, the deal is off, period. He must agree to this in writing, but (we) don't sign anything, and we deny everything.
2) He must endorse the Dem nominee. No behind the back attacks, or any funny business.
|
JohnLocke
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-22-04 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:21 AM
Response to Original message |